Literature DB >> 26547638

Dairy farmers' use and non-use values in animal welfare: Determining the empirical content and structure with anchored best-worst scaling.

H Hansson1, C J Lagerkvist2.   

Abstract

In this study, we sought to identify empirically the types of use and non-use values that motivate dairy farmers in their work relating to animal welfare of dairy cows. We also sought to identify how they prioritize between these use and non-use values. Use values are derived from productivity considerations; non-use values are derived from the wellbeing of the animals, independent of the present or future use the farmer may make of the animal. In particular, we examined the empirical content and structure of the economic value dairy farmers associate with animal welfare of dairy cows. Based on a best-worst scaling approach and data from 123 Swedish dairy farmers, we suggest that the economic value those farmers associate with animal welfare of dairy cows covers aspects of both use and non-use type, with non-use values appearing more important. Using principal component factor analysis, we were able to check unidimensionality of the economic value construct. These findings are useful for understanding why dairy farmers may be interested in considering dairy cow welfare. Such understanding is essential for improving agricultural policy and advice aimed at encouraging dairy farmers to improve animal welfare; communicating to consumers the values under which dairy products are produced; and providing a basis for more realistic assumptions when developing economic models about dairy farmers' behavior.
Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal welfare of dairy cow; best-worst scaling; economic value in animal welfare; non-use value; use value

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26547638     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2015-9755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  5 in total

1.  Perception of farmers about endometritis prevention and control measures for zero-grazed dairy cows on smallholder farms in Rwanda.

Authors:  Pascal Nyabinwa; Olivier Basole Kashongwe; Claire d'Andre Hirwa; Bockline Omedo Bebe
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  Resource, Collaborator, or Individual Cow? Applying Q Methodology to Investigate Austrian Farmers' Viewpoints on Motivational Aspects of Improving Animal Welfare.

Authors:  Lorenz Maurer; Josef Schenkenfelder; Christoph Winckler
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-01-12

3.  An estimation of the financial consequences of reducing pig aggression.

Authors:  Rachel S E Peden; Simon P Turner; Irene Camerlink; Faical Akaichi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Benefits of Veterinary Herd Health Management on German Dairy Farms: Status Quo and Farmers' Perspective.

Authors:  Jenny Ries; Katharina Charlotte Jensen; Kerstin-Elisabeth Müller; Christa Thöne-Reineke; Roswitha Merle
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-01-11

5.  The Role of Trust in Explaining Food Choice: Combining Choice Experiment and Attribute Best-Worst Scaling.

Authors:  Ching-Hua Yeh; Monika Hartmann; Nina Langen
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-01-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.