Charlie Tan1, Michael Ritchie2, Jason Alldred3, Nick Daneman4. 1. Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 2. Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. North Bay Regional Health Centre, North Bay, Ontario, Canada. 4. Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada nick.daneman@sunnybrook.ca.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Antibiotic purchasing data are a widely used, but unsubstantiated, measure of antibiotic consumption. To validate this source, we compared purchasing data from hospitals and external medical databases with patient-level dispensing data. METHODS: Antibiotic purchasing and dispensing data from internal hospital records and purchasing data from IMS Health were obtained for two hospitals between May 2013 and April 2015. Internal purchasing data were validated against dispensing data, and IMS data were compared with both internal metrics. Scatterplots of individual antimicrobial data points were generated; Pearson's correlation and linear regression coefficients were computed. A secondary analysis re-examined these correlations over shorter calendar periods. RESULTS: Internal purchasing data were strongly correlated with dispensing data, with correlation coefficients of 0.90 (95% CI = 0.83-0.95) and 0.98 (95% CI = 0.95-0.99) at hospitals A and B, respectively. Although dispensing data were consistently lower than purchasing data, this was attributed to a single antibiotic at both hospitals. IMS data were favourably correlated with, but underestimated, internal purchasing and dispensing data. This difference was accounted for by eight antibiotics for which direct sales from some manufacturers were not included in the IMS database. The correlation between purchasing and dispensing data was consistent across periods as short as 3 months, but not at monthly intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Both internal and external antibiotic purchasing data are strongly correlated with dispensing data. If outliers are accounted for appropriately, internal purchasing data could be used for cost-effective evaluation of antimicrobial stewardship programmes, and external data sets could be used for surveillance and research across geographical regions.
OBJECTIVES: Antibiotic purchasing data are a widely used, but unsubstantiated, measure of antibiotic consumption. To validate this source, we compared purchasing data from hospitals and external medical databases with patient-level dispensing data. METHODS: Antibiotic purchasing and dispensing data from internal hospital records and purchasing data from IMS Health were obtained for two hospitals between May 2013 and April 2015. Internal purchasing data were validated against dispensing data, and IMS data were compared with both internal metrics. Scatterplots of individual antimicrobial data points were generated; Pearson's correlation and linear regression coefficients were computed. A secondary analysis re-examined these correlations over shorter calendar periods. RESULTS: Internal purchasing data were strongly correlated with dispensing data, with correlation coefficients of 0.90 (95% CI = 0.83-0.95) and 0.98 (95% CI = 0.95-0.99) at hospitals A and B, respectively. Although dispensing data were consistently lower than purchasing data, this was attributed to a single antibiotic at both hospitals. IMS data were favourably correlated with, but underestimated, internal purchasing and dispensing data. This difference was accounted for by eight antibiotics for which direct sales from some manufacturers were not included in the IMS database. The correlation between purchasing and dispensing data was consistent across periods as short as 3 months, but not at monthly intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Both internal and external antibiotic purchasing data are strongly correlated with dispensing data. If outliers are accounted for appropriately, internal purchasing data could be used for cost-effective evaluation of antimicrobial stewardship programmes, and external data sets could be used for surveillance and research across geographical regions.
Authors: Patricia L Schirmer; Renee C Mercier; Russell A Ryono; Nancy Nguyen; Cynthia A Lucero; Gina Oda; Mark Holodniy Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: David M Livermore; Rosy Reynolds; Peter Stephens; Georgia Duckworth; David Felmingham; Alan P Johnson; Stephen Murchan; Olive Murphy; Usha Gungabissoon; Pauline Waight; Richard Pebody; Jemma Shackcloth; Marina Warner; Laura Williams; Robert C George Journal: Int J Antimicrob Agents Date: 2006-09-14 Impact factor: 5.283
Authors: Gail S Itokazu; Robert C Glowacki; David N Schwartz; Mary F Wisniewski; Robert J Rydman; Robert A Weinstein Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Conan MacDougall; J Patrick Powell; Christopher K Johnson; Michael B Edmond; Ronald E Polk Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2005-06-28 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Kevin L Schwartz; Camille Achonu; Kevin Antoine Brown; Bradley Langford; Nick Daneman; Jennie Johnstone; Gary Garber Journal: CMAJ Open Date: 2018-10-31
Authors: Kevin L Schwartz; Cynthia Chen; Bradley J Langford; Kevin A Brown; Nick Daneman; Jennie Johnstone; Julie Hc Wu; Valerie Leung; Gary Garber Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-09-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Charlotte G Boone; Tony Antoniou; David N Juurlink; Teagan Rolf von den Baumen; Sophie A Kitchen; Georgia C Richards; Mina Tadrous; Tara Gomes Journal: CMAJ Open Date: 2021-12-14