Literature DB >> 26546363

Prediction of hemodynamic reactivity using dynamic variations of Analgesia/Nociception Index (∆ANI).

E Boselli1, R Logier2, L Bouvet3, B Allaouchiche3.   

Abstract

The Analgesia/Nociception Index (ANI), a 0-100 non-invasive index calculated from heart rate variability, reflects the analgesia/nociception balance during general anesthesia. We hypothesized that dynamic variations of ANI (∆ANI) would provide better performance than static values to predict hemodynamic reactivity during desflurane/remifentanil general anesthesia. One hundred and twenty-eight patients undergoing ear-nose-throat or lower limb orthopedic surgery were analyzed in this prospective observational study. The ANI, heart rate and systolic blood pressure were recorded before induction, at skin incision, during procedure and at emergence from general anesthesia. Changes in these variables were recorded after 1 min for ANI (ANI1min) and 5 min for heart rate and systolic blood pressure. The dynamic variation of ANI at the different time points was defined as: ∆ANI = (ANI1min - ANI)/([ANI + ANI1min]/2). Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were built to evaluate the performance of ANI, ANI1 min and ∆ANI to predict hemodynamic reactivity (increase by more than 20 % in heart rate and/or systolic blood pressure within 5 min). For the prediction of hemodynamic reactivity, better performance was observed with ∆ANI (area under ROC curve (AUC ROC) = 0.90) in comparison to ANI (ROC AUC = 0.50) and ANI1min (ROC AUC = 0.77). A ∆ANI threshold of -19 % predicts hemodynamic reactivity with 85 % [95 % CI 77-91] sensitivity and 85 % [95 % CI 81-89] specificity. Dynamic variations of ANI provide better performance than static values to predict hemodynamic reactivity during desflurane/remifentanil general anesthesia. These findings may be of interest for the individual adaptation of remifentanil doses guided by ∆ANI during general anesthesia, although this remains to be demonstrated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analgesia; Intraoperative; Monitoring; Remifentanil

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26546363     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-015-9802-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  26 in total

Review 1.  A program for computing the prediction probability and the related receiver operating characteristic graph.

Authors:  Denis Jordan; Marcel Steiner; Eberhard F Kochs; Gerhard Schneider
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  PhysioDoloris: a monitoring device for analgesia / nociception balance evaluation using heart rate variability analysis.

Authors:  R Logier; M Jeanne; J De Jonckheere; A Dassonneville; M Delecroix; B Tavernier
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2010

3.  Certainty and uncertainty: NICE guidance on 'depth of anaesthesia' monitoring.

Authors:  D Smith; J Andrzejowski; A Smith
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Antinociceptive monitors: tools or fools?

Authors:  S C Høymork
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.105

Review 5.  Monitoring the nociception-anti-nociception balance.

Authors:  Matthias Gruenewald; Christoph Ilies
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2013-06

Review 6.  Physiological Signal Processing for Individualized Anti-nociception Management During General Anesthesia: a Review.

Authors:  J De Jonckheere; V Bonhomme; M Jeanne; E Boselli; M Gruenewald; R Logier; P Richebé
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2015-08-13

7.  Analgesia/nociception index for the assessment of acute postoperative pain.

Authors:  E Boselli; M Jeanne
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Variations of the analgesia nociception index during general anaesthesia for laparoscopic abdominal surgery.

Authors:  M Jeanne; C Clément; J De Jonckheere; R Logier; B Tavernier
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.502

9.  Pain/analgesia evaluation using heart rate variability analysis.

Authors:  R Logier; M Jeanne; B Tavernier; J De Jonckheere
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2006

Review 10.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Jan P Vandenbroucke; Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Peter C Gøtzsche; Cynthia D Mulrow; Stuart J Pocock; Charles Poole; James J Schlesselman; Matthias Egger
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  13 in total

1.  Analgesia nociception index (ani) monitoring in patients with thoracic paravertebral block: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Nurseda Dundar; Alparslan Kus; Yavuz Gurkan; Kamil Toker; Mine Solak
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) and ephedrine: a dangerous liasion.

Authors:  Rita Graça; Francisco A Lobo
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 3.  Journal of clinical monitoring and computing 2016 end of year summary: anesthesia.

Authors:  Jan F A Hendrickx; Andre M De Wolf
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Effects of hypnosis on the relative parasympathetic tone assessed by ANI (Analgesia/Nociception Index) in healthy volunteers: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  E Boselli; H Musellec; L Martin; F Bernard; N Fusco; N Guillou; P Hugot; X Paqueron; T Yven; C Virot
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-08-20       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 5.  Description of the validity of the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) and Nociception Level Index (NOL) for nociception assessment in anesthetized patients undergoing surgery: a systematized review.

Authors:  T Shiva Shahiri; Philippe Richebé; Melissa Richard-Lalonde; Céline Gélinas
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 1.977

Review 6.  Analgesia nociception index and high frequency variability index: promising indicators of relative parasympathetic tone.

Authors:  Keisuke Yoshida; Shinju Obara; Satoki Inoue
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Effect of Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion on Parameters Derived From Catacrotic Phase of Photoplethysmography Under Different Concentrations of Remifentanil.

Authors:  Wanlin Chen; Ying Feng; Xinzhong Chen; Feng Jiang; Jiajun Miao; Shali Chen; Hang Chen
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 3.316

8.  Prediction of Hemodynamic Reactivity by Electroencephalographically Derived Pain Threshold Index in Children Undergoing General Anesthesia: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Lei Wu; Siyuan Wang; Yanting Wang; Kan Zhang; Jie Bai; Jijian Zheng
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.133

9.  Newborn infant parasympathetic evaluation (NIPE) as a predictor of hemodynamic response in children younger than 2 years under general anesthesia: an observational pilot study.

Authors:  Kan Zhang; Siyuan Wang; Lei Wu; Yun'an Song; Meihua Cai; Mazhong Zhang; Jijian Zheng
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.217

10.  Development of a Hemodynamic Model Using Routine Monitoring Parameters for Nociceptive Responses Evaluation During Surgery Under General Anesthesia.

Authors:  Munetaka Hirose; Yoshiko Kobayashi; Shiro Nakamoto; Ryusuke Ueki; Nobutaka Kariya; Tsuneo Tatara
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-05-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.