| Literature DB >> 26545861 |
Peiyao Li1, Jinfeng Meng2,3, Yun Zhai4, Hongxing Zhang5, Lixia Yu6, Zhifu Wang7, Xiaoai Zhang8, Pengbo Cao9, Xi Chen10, Yuqing Han11, Yang Zhang12, Huipeng Chen13, Yan Ling14, Yuxia Li15, Ying Cui16, Jin-Xin Bei17, Yi-Xin Zeng18, Fuchu He19, Gangqiao Zhou20.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Argonaute 2 (AGO2), a central component of RNA-induced silencing complex, plays critical roles in cancer. We examined whether the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of AGO2 were related to the risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26545861 PMCID: PMC4636795 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1895-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Positions and frequencies of SNPs within AGO2 gene
| No. | SNPsa | Alleles (Minor/Major) | Frequenciesb | Positionsc | Regions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | rs4961280 | C/A | 0.111 | −1809 | Promoter |
| 2 | rs11996715 | C/A | 0.430 | −1686 | Promoter |
| 3 | rs4961226 | G/T | 0.400 | 3050 | Intron 1 |
| 4 | rs10088596 | C/T | 0.453 | 5311 | Intron 1 |
| 5 |
| G/C | 0.105 | 9957 | Intron 1 |
| 6 | rs13261055 | A/G | 0.386 | 16208 | Intron 1 |
| 7 | rs7001653 | G/A | 0.444 | 24567 | Intron 1 |
| 8 | rs7819727 | A/G | 0.452 | 48394 | Intron 1 |
| 9 | rs7009635 | T/C | 0.367 | 50724 | Intron 2 |
| 10 | rs7005286 | C/T | 0.337 | 51145 | Intron 2 |
| 11 | rs11776034 | C/G | 0.211 | 53712 | Intron 2 |
| 12 | rs3735805 | C/T | 0.356 | 68083 | Intron 3 |
| 13 |
| A/G | 0.453 | 72247 | Intron 3 |
| 14 | rs2292773 | C/T | 0.278 | 73107 | Intron 4 |
| 15 | rs3928672 | G/A | 0.222 | 73438 | Intron 4 |
| 16 | rs2271735 | G/T | 0.178 | 76295 | Intron 6 |
| 17 |
| G/C | 0.183 | 83748 | Intron 10 |
| 18 | rs2292779 | G/C | 0.244 | 84394 | Intron 11 |
| 19 | rs2944764 | C/T | 0.239 | 84576 | Intron 11 |
| 20 | rs11166983 | G/A | 0.278 | 87519 | Intron 11 |
| 21 | rs12542354 | C/T | 0.239 | 89462 | Intron 13 |
| 22 | rs13252337 | A/G | 0.186 | 96222 | Intron 16 |
| 23 | rs2977469 | G/A | 0.465 | 96314 | Intron 16 |
| 24 | rs2977464 | C/T | 0.333 | 100412 | Intron 16 |
| 25 | rs2977462 | T/C | 0.467 | 102467 | Intron 16 |
SNPs in bold were not in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) (rs883596 and rs2977490, both P < 0.05) or failed genotyping (rs2977481) in the Guangxi population
adbSNP ID number
bMinor allele frequencies in HapMap-HCB (HCB, unrelated Han Chinese in Beijing, China)
cThe position of the SNPs is relative to the first nucleotide of the open reading frame of the AGO2 gene, referred to as accession number NT_008046.15
Genetic associations of rs3928672 with the lymph node metastasis of NPC
| Populations | Genotypes | N classification, | OR (95 % CI)a | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N0 | N1 | N2 | N3 | ||||
| Guangxi | ( | ( | ( | ( | |||
| GG | 91 (51.4) | 187 (46.1) | 95 (52.8) | 22 (28.2) | 1.00 (reference) | ||
| GA | 72 (40.7) | 177 (43.6) | 69 (38.3) | 47 (60.3) | 2.50 (1.47-4.25) | 0.0010 | |
| AA | 14 (7.9) | 42 (10.3) | 16 (8.9) | 9 (11.5) | 2.31 (1.01-5.27) | 0.046 | |
| GA + AA | 86 (48.6) | 219 (53.9) | 85 (47.2) | 56 (71.8) | 2.47 (1.47-4.13) | 0.00030 | |
| Guangdong | ( | ( | ( | ( | |||
| GG | 123 (54.4) | 184 (49.5) | 134 (51.5) | 25 (38.5) | 1.00 (reference) | ||
| GA | 87 (38.5) | 152 (40.8) | 105 (40.4) | 37 (56.9) | 1.95 (1.14-3.34) | 0.015 | |
| AA | 16 (7.1) | 36 (9.7) | 21 (8.1) | 3 (4.6) | 0.79 (0.23-2.72) | 0.71 | |
| GA + AA | 103 (45.6) | 188 (50.5) | 126 (48.5) | 40 (61.5) | 1.75 (1.03-2.98) | 0.034 | |
| Pooled | ( | ( | ( | ( | |||
| GG | 214 (53.1) | 371 (47.7) | 229 (52.0) | 47 (32.9) | 1.00 (reference) | ||
| GA | 159 (39.5) | 329 (42.3) | 174 (39.5) | 84 (58.7) | 2.22 (1.51-3.20) | 4.07 × 10−5 | |
| AA | 30 (7.4) | 78 (10.0) | 37 (8.5) | 12 (8.4) | 1.54 (0.79-2.99) | 0.21 | |
| GA + AA | 189 (46.9) | 407 (52.3) | 211 (48.0) | 96 (67.1) | 2.08 (1.44-3.01) | 8.60 × 10−5 | |
| Overallb | ( | ( | ( | ( | |||
| GG | 214 (53.1) | 371 (47.7) | 229 (52.0) | 47 (32.9) | 1.00 (reference) | ||
| GA | 159 (39.5) | 329 (42.3) | 174 (39.5) | 84 (58.7) | 2.21 (1.52-3.23) | 3.82 × 10−5 | |
| AA | 30 (7.4) | 78 (10.0) | 37 (8.5) | 12 (8.4) | 1.66 (0.83-3.29) | 0.15 | |
| GA + AA | 189 (46.9) | 407 (52.3) | 211 (48.0) | 96 (67.1) | 2.09 (1.44-3.03) | 9.64 × 10−5 | |
Note: Guangxi and Guangdong populations consist of 855 and 962 patients with known lymph node involvement (N classification) stage, respectively. Due to DNA quality and/or quantity, the actual sample sizes were 841 and 923 patients in the Guangxi and Guangdong population, respectively
Abbreviations: N lymph node involvement, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval
aIn the Guangxi population, the ORs, 95 % CIs and P values were calculated for N3 vs. N0 + N1 + N2 and adjusted for sex, age, status of smoking and drinking, smoking level, family history and nationality. In the Guangdong population, the ORs, 95 % CIs and P values were calculated for N3 vs. N0 + N1 + N2 and adjusted for sex, age, status of smoking and drinking, and smoking level. In the pooled population, the ORs, 95 % CIs and P values were calculated for N3 vs. N0 + N1 + N2 and adjusted for sex, age, status of smoking and drinking, and smoking level. Another confounding factor, native place, was also adjusted in the pooled population
bA meta-analysis combining two independent case–control studies. The P values for heterogeneity among sample sets are 0.52 for GA vs. GG group, 0.18 for AA vs. GG and 0.36 for GA + AA vs. GG group, respectively
Fig. 1Protein expression level of AGO2 by immunohistochemical staining in representative NPC tissues and non-cancerous nasopharyngeal tissues. Panels a and b NPC tissues; Panels c and d non-cancerous nasopharyngeal tissues. Images in the box (left, magnification 200 ×) were enlarged and shown in the right (magnification 400 ×). The AGO2 protein was found to locate in the cytoplasm of malignant cells
Fig. 2The effect of AGO2 knockdown on proliferation, apoptosis and migration of NPC cells. a Confirmation of AGO2 knockdown in CNE2Z cells transfected with AGO2 shRNAs or control shRNA by western blot assay. b Cell proliferation was evaluated by CCK-8 assay in CNE2Z cells transfected with AGO2 shRNAs or control shRNA at different time points (24, 48, 72 and 96 h). The experiments were repeated at least three times, and the points represent the mean values of triplicate tests (mean ± SD). ***P < 0.0001, compared with the controls (ANOVA test). c Apoptosis was assessed by flow cytometric analysis of annexin V-APC/7-AAD staining in CNE2Z cells transfected with AGO2 shRNAs or control shRNA. Representative flow cytometric analysis are shown (left panel). The Annexin V-positive cells were regarded as apoptotic cells. The experiments were repeated at least three times, and the histogram (right panel) represents the mean values of apoptotic cells from triplicate tests (mean ± SD). ***P < 0.0001, compared with the controls (Unpaired t test). d Cell migration was evaluated by transwell assay in CNE2Z cells transfected with AGO2 shRNAs or control shRNA. Representative results are shown (left panel). Magnification: 400 ×. The experiments were repeated at least three times, and the histogram (right panel) represents the mean numbers of transferred cells from triplicate tests (mean ± SD). ***P < 0.0001, compared with the controls (Unpaired t test). CCK-8, Cell Counting Kit-8; SD, standard deviation
Fig. 3The most enriched biological processes and signaling pathways of the 1160 genes with significantly altered expression following AGO2 knockdown in CNE2Z cells by cytoscape plug-in of Reactome FI analysis. “G” represents “GO biological process”, “K” represents “KEGG pathway”, “N” represents “NCI PID”, “R” represents “Reactome”, “P” represents “Reactome Pathway” and “B” represents “BioCarta”. The detailed results were shown in Additional file 3: Table S10