Literature DB >> 26545361

Living scaffolds: surgical repair using scaffolds seeded with human adipose-derived stem cells.

A Klinger1,2, M Kawata1,2, M Villalobos1,2, R B Jones1,2, S Pike1,2, N Wu1,2, S Chang1,2, P Zhang1,2, P DiMuzio3, J Vernengo4, P Benvenuto4, R D Goldfarb1,2, K Hunter1,2, Y Liu1,2, J P Carpenter1,2, T N Tulenko5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Decellularized porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) is a biological scaffold used surgically for tissue repair. Here, we demonstrate a model of SIS as a scaffold for human adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) in vitro and apply it in vivo in a rat ventral hernia repair model. STUDY
DESIGN: ASCs adherence was examined by confocal microscopy and proliferation rate was measured by growth curves. Multipotency of ASCs seeded onto SIS was tested using adipogenic, chondrogenic, and osteogenic induction media. For in vivo testing, midline abdominal musculofascial and peritoneal defects were created in Sprague-Dawley rats. Samples were evaluated for tensile strength, histopathology and immunohistochemistry.
RESULTS: All test groups showed cell adherence and proliferation on SIS. Fibronectin-treated scaffolds retained more cells than those treated with vehicle alone (p < 0.05). Fresh stromal vascular fraction (SVF) pellets containing ASCs were injected onto the SIS scaffold and showed similar results to cultured ASCs. Maintenance of multipotency on SIS was confirmed by lineage-specific markers and dyes. Histopathology revealed neovascularization and cell influx to ASC-seeded SIS samples following animal implantation. ASC-seeded SIS appeared to offer a stronger repair than plain SIS, but these results were not statistically significant. Immunohistochemistry showed continued presence of cells of human origin in ASC-seeded repairs at 1 month postoperation.
CONCLUSION: Pretreatment of the scaffold with fibronectin offers a method to increase cell adhesion and delivery. ASCs maintain their immunophenotype and ability to differentiate while on SIS. Seeding freshly isolated SVF onto the scaffold demonstrated that minimally manipulated cells may be useful for perioperative surgical applications within the OR suite. We have shown that this model for a "living mesh" can be successfully used in abdominal wall reconstruction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hernia; Mesenchymal stem cells; SIS; Small intestine submucosa

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26545361     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-015-1415-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  29 in total

1.  Small intestinal submucosa seeded with intestinal smooth muscle cells in a rodent jejunal interposition model.

Authors:  Harry H Qin; James C Y Dunn
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  Long-term follow-up of patients undergoing adipose-derived adult stem cell administration to treat complex perianal fistulas.

Authors:  Hector Guadalajara; Dolores Herreros; Paloma De-La-Quintana; Jacobo Trebol; Mariano Garcia-Arranz; Damian Garcia-Olmo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, or adipose tissue.

Authors:  Susanne Kern; Hermann Eichler; Johannes Stoeve; Harald Klüter; Karen Bieback
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 6.277

4.  Linear shear conditioning improves vascular graft retention of adipose-derived stem cells by upregulation of the alpha5beta1 integrin.

Authors:  Stephen E McIlhenny; Eric S Hager; Daniel J Grabo; Christopher DiMatteo; Irving M Shapiro; Thomas N Tulenko; Paul J DiMuzio
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  Anchorage of VEGF to the extracellular matrix conveys differential signaling responses to endothelial cells.

Authors:  Tom T Chen; Alfonso Luque; Sunyoung Lee; Sean M Anderson; Tatiana Segura; M Luisa Iruela-Arispe
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 10.539

6.  Enhanced strength of endothelial attachment on polyester elastomer and polytetrafluoroethylene graft surfaces with fibronectin substrate.

Authors:  K A Kesler; M B Herring; M P Arnold; J L Glover; H M Park; M N Helmus; P J Bendick
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias.

Authors:  G E Leber; J L Garb; A I Alexander; W P Reed
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1998-04

8.  Multilineage cells from human adipose tissue: implications for cell-based therapies.

Authors:  P A Zuk; M Zhu; H Mizuno; J Huang; J W Futrell; A J Katz; P Benhaim; H P Lorenz; M H Hedrick
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2001-04

Review 9.  Fibronectin and stem cell differentiation - lessons from chondrogenesis.

Authors:  Purva Singh; Jean E Schwarzbauer
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 5.285

10.  Uterine leiomyomas exhibit fewer stem/progenitor cell characteristics when compared with corresponding normal myometrium.

Authors:  Henry L Chang; Tharanga N Senaratne; Lihua Zhang; Paul P Szotek; Ethan Stewart; David Dombkowski; Frederic Preffer; Patricia K Donahoe; Jose Teixeira
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 3.060

View more
  10 in total

1.  One-year follow-up study of iBTA-induced allogenic biosheet for repair of abdominal wall defects in a beagle model: a pilot study.

Authors:  T Terazawa; M Furukoshi; Y Nakayama
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 2.  A Review of Cell-Based Strategies for Soft Tissue Reconstruction.

Authors:  Elizabeth Brett; Natalie Chung; William Tripp Leavitt; Arash Momeni; Michael T Longaker; Derrick C Wan
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 6.389

3.  Minimal modulation of the host immune response to SIS matrix implants by mesenchymal stem cells from the amniotic fluid.

Authors:  F Lesage; S Pranpanus; F M Bosisio; M Jacobs; S Ospitalieri; J Toelen; J Deprest
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Burst inflation test for measuring biomechanical properties of rat abdominal walls.

Authors:  V D Mahalingam; B C Syverud; A M Myers; K W VanDusen; L M Larkin; W M Kuzon; E M Arruda
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Engineered Axonal Tracts as "Living Electrodes" for Synaptic-Based Modulation of Neural Circuitry.

Authors:  Mijail D Serruya; James P Harris; Dayo O Adewole; Laura A Struzyna; Justin C Burrell; Ashley Nemes; Dmitriy Petrov; Reuben H Kraft; H Isaac Chen; John A Wolf; D Kacy Cullen
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 18.808

6.  Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Enhance Bacterial Clearance and Preserve Bioprosthetic Integrity in a Model of Mesh Infection.

Authors:  Erik T Criman; Wendy E Kurata; Karen W Matsumoto; Harry T Aubin; Carmen E Campbell; Lisa M Pierce
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-06-17

Review 7.  Application of decellularized bone matrix as a bioscaffold in bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Halimeh Amirazad; Mehdi Dadashpour; Nosratollah Zarghami
Journal:  J Biol Eng       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 4.355

8.  Evaluation of a Novel Hybrid Viable Bioprosthetic Mesh in a Model of Mesh Infection.

Authors:  Ally Ha; Erik T Criman; Wendy E Kurata; Karen W Matsumoto; Lisa M Pierce
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-08-10

Review 9.  Etiology of Inguinal Hernias: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Stina Öberg; Kristoffer Andresen; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2017-09-22

10.  Extracellular matrix-based biomaterials as adipose-derived stem cell delivery vehicles in wound healing: a comparative study between a collagen scaffold and two xenografts.

Authors:  Héctor Capella-Monsonís; Andrea De Pieri; Rita Peixoto; Stefanie Korntner; Dimitrios I Zeugolis
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 6.832

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.