Literature DB >> 26544563

Comparison of Forward Light Scatter Changes Between SMILE, Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK, and Epipolis LASIK: Results of a 1-Year Prospective Study.

Lulu Xu, Yan Wang, Jing Li, Yangchen Liu, Wenjing Wu, Hui Zhang, Yanan Wu, Gauhar Ali Khan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the characteristics of forward light scatter changes after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and to compare these changes with those after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK (femto-LASIK) and epipolis LASIK (epi-LASIK).
METHODS: A total of 303 eyes (SMILE group = 118 eyes, femto-LASIK group = 90 eyes, epi-LASIK group = 95) of 157 patients were included in this study. Forward straylight was measured preoperatively and 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively using a C-Quant straylight meter (Oculus Optikgeräte, Wetzlar, Germany).
RESULTS: A significant increase in straylight was found in the femto-LASIK group only at 1 month after the procedure (P = .002), whereas significant increases were found in the epi-LASIK group at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year after the procedure (P < .001). There were no significant increases in the straylight values after SMILE (P = .310) compared with the preoperative values, although the straylight values were slightly increased at 1 month. Significant differences in the postoperative-preoperative straylight value (Δlog[s]) changes were found between the SMILE, femto-LASIK, and epi-LASIK groups over the follow-up period (P < .001 for all). The correlations between the ablation depth/central corneal thickness ratios and the straylight values were statistically significant in the femto-LASIK and epi-LASIK groups, whereas no significant correlation between the lenticule thickness/central corneal thickness ratios and the stray-light values was found in the SMILE group.
CONCLUSIONS: Forward straylight was slightly increased in the early stage after the femto-LASIK procedure and was significantly increased throughout the follow-up period after epi-LASIK surgery. The SMILE procedure appeared to have a smaller effect on forward light scatter within the 1-year follow-up period. Copyright 2015, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26544563     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20151021-04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of disk halo size after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Authors:  Tian Han; Feng Zhao; Xun Chen; Huamao Miao; Zhuoyi Chen; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Corneal stromal dehydration and optimal stromal exposure time during corneal refractive surgery measured using a three-dimensional optical profiler.

Authors:  Yanan Wu; Yan Wang; Zimiao Zhang; Xingchen Yu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 3.535

3.  Fluctuation in straylight measurements during the visual recovery phase after small incision lenticule extraction.

Authors:  Kelvin H Wan; Rachel W Y Tsui; Tommy C Y Chan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Straylight As The Result Of Refractive Correction.

Authors:  Zoraida S Gaurisankar; Gwyneth A van Rijn; Gregorius Pm Luyten; Thomas Jtp van den Berg
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-12

5.  Comparison of visual outcomes after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK versus flap-off epipolis LASIK for myopia.

Authors:  Junjie Piao; Woong-Joo Whang; Choun-Ki Joo
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.209

6.  Comparison of the Optical Quality between Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser LASIK.

Authors:  Ying Jin; Yan Wang; Lulu Xu; Tong Zuo; Hua Li; Rui Dou; Jiamei Zhang
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 1.909

7.  Construction of a Corneal Stromal Equivalent with SMILE-Derived Lenticules and Fibrin Glue.

Authors:  Houfa Yin; Peijin Qiu; Fang Wu; Wei Zhang; Wenqi Teng; Zhenwei Qin; Chao Li; Jiaojie Zhou; Zhi Fang; Qiaomei Tang; Qiuli Fu; Jian Ma; Yabo Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.