| Literature DB >> 26544042 |
Samuel Wanji1,2, Nathalie Amvongo-Adjia2,3, Benjamin Koudou4, Abdel Jelil Njouendou1,2, Patrick W Chounna Ndongmo1,2, Jonas A Kengne-Ouafo1,2, Fabrice R Datchoua-Poutcheu2, Bridget Adzemye Fovennso2, Dizzle Bita Tayong1,2, Fanny Fri Fombad1,2, Peter U Fischer5, Peter I Enyong1,2, Moses Bockarie4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Immunochromatographic card test (ICT) is a tool to map the distribution of Wuchereria bancrofti. In areas highly endemic for loaisis in DRC and Cameroon, a relationship has been envisaged between high L. loa microfilaria (Mf) loads and ICT positivity. However, similar associations have not been demonstrated from other areas with contrasting levels of L. loa endemicity. This study investigated the cross-reactivity of ICT when mapping lymphatic filariasis (LF) in areas with contrasting endemicity levels of loiasis and mansonellosis in Cameroon. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26544042 PMCID: PMC4636288 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004184
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Fig 1Map of the study area.
Fig 2Study design.
Fig 3Age distribution of the study population.
Positive results for antigen detection, clinical manifestations of lymphatic filariasis and microfilaraemia test.
| Site | Health district | Community | N° of persons examined | Number of ICT positive (%) | Number of lymphoedema cases (%) | Number of |
| Number of |
|
|
| |||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Dem 2 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 1245.8 | 14 | 57.4 | ||
| Djal | 44 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 2761.1 | 10 | 121.0 | ||
| Gabaleta | 47 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1662.1 | 6 | 94.2 | ||
| Kamba Mieri | 60 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 2777.5 | 11 | 81.6 | ||
| Konga | 36 | 4 | 1 | 14 | 3220.8 | 24 | 201.4 | ||
| Ngoulmekong | 52 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 1272.4 | 29 | 168.1 | ||
| Nguikouassima | 63 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 1067.2 | 20 | 78.1 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| |||||||||
| Aviation | 42 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 797.1 | 11 | 46.3 | ||
| Bissoua 2 | 83 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 412.1 | 56 | 189.2 | ||
| Doume Village | 42 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 254.6 | 10 | 50.9 | ||
| Koum | 45 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 519.3 | 26 | 94.2 | ||
| Labba | 34 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 400.0 | 27 | 309.6 | ||
| Mayos | 75 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 42.0 | 39 | 129.1 | ||
| Meba | 47 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 121.0 | 35 | 159.6 | ||
| Messamena Village | 36 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 559.1 | 22 | 147.3 | ||
| Nkomzuh | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 6 | 70.5 | ||
| Ntollock | 52 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 147.8 | 14 | 34.8 | ||
| Soleye | 43 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 1642.0 | 29 | 164.9 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| |||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Jator | 41 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2615.7 | 1 | 20 | ||
| Mbiripkwa | 57 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 652.4 | 0 | - | ||
| Ngomkow | 53 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3311.1 | 0 | - | ||
| Ngu | 59 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 705.7 | 0 | - | ||
| Nguri | 68 | 2 | 7 | 30 | 1156.1 | 0 | - | ||
| Nking | 65 | 4 | 0 | 29 | 1798.7 | 0 | - | ||
| Ntem | 84 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 494 | 0 | - | ||
| Nwanti | 68 | 2 | 2 | 26 | 1156.7 | 0 | - | ||
| Nwat | 59 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 769.1 | 0 | - | ||
| Sabongari | 49 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 847.4 | 0 | - | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| |||||||||
| Site | Health district | Community | N° of persons examined | Number of ICT positive (%) | Number of lymphoedema cases (%) | Number of |
| Number of |
|
|
| |||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Baduma | 41 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 372.6 | 7 | 64 | ||
| Bolo | 51 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 8 | 53.6 | ||
| Matondo 2 | 49 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 640 | 4 | 33.6 | ||
| Weme | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 240 | 4 | 67.8 | ||
|
|
| 0 | 0 |
|
|
|
| ||
|
| |||||||||
| Ediki | 98 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 787.3 | 8 | 36.4 | ||
| Mbalangi | 101 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 423.6 | 2 | 63.2 | ||
|
|
|
| 0 |
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| 0 |
|
|
|
| ||
|
| |||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Ayukaba | 45 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 174.4 | 6 | 68.8 | ||
| Ebam | 54 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 149.3 | 1 | 200 | ||
| Mbatop | 41 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1128 | 5 | 64.9 | ||
|
|
| 0 | 0 |
|
|
|
| ||
|
| |||||||||
| Bache | 21 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 63.2 | 13 | 76.8 | ||
| Eyanchang | 55 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7080 | 1 | 200 | ||
| Kesham | 40 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2983.2 | 21 | 144.4 | ||
| Mbakem | 40 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 4 | 73.3 | ||
| Taboh | 80 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 456.7 | 12 | 34.8 | ||
|
|
| 0 | 0 |
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| 0 | 0 |
|
|
|
|
No W. bancrofti Mf were found in ICT positive and lymphoedema cases.
Gender and age-related prevalence of ICT test card, lymphoedema and diurnal microfilaraemia (TBF).
| N° of persons examined | Number of ICT positive (%) | Number of lymphoedema cases (%) | Number of |
| Number of |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Male | 1065 | 6 (0.6) | 14 (1.3) | 197 (18.5) | 857.1 | 266 (25.0) | 130.3 |
| Female | 1125 | 18 (1.6) | 6 (0.5) | 175 (15.6) | 820.2 | 220 (19.6) | 96.8 |
|
| |||||||
| 10–19 | 379 | 2 (0.5) | 3 (0.8) | 31 (8.2) | 1116.0 | 64 (16.9) | 71.6 |
| 20–29 | 390 | 6 (1.5) | 2 (0.5) | 81 (20.8) | 981.2 | 70 (20.3) | 69.3 |
| 30–39 | 363 | 4 (1.1) | 2 (0.6) | 54 (14.9) | 860.4 | 58 (16.0) | 102.3 |
| 40–49 | 349 | 3 (0.9) | 2 (0.6) | 70 (20.1) | 772.9 | 72 (20.6) | 95.0 |
| 50–59 | 292 | 2 (0.7) | 2 (0.7) | 45 (15.4) | 590.2 | 84 (28.8) | 158.2 |
| 60–69 | 221 | 1 (0.5) | 4 (1.8) | 47 (21.3) | 908.7 | 65 (29.4) | 147.8 |
| 70–79 | 139 | 3 (2.2) | 4 (2.9) | 28 (20.1) | 869.5 | 46 (33.1) | 257.6 |
| 80 + | 57 | 3 (5.3) | 1 (1.8) | 16 (28.1) | 583.0 | 18 (31.6) | 159.0 |
No W. bancrofti Mf were found in ICT positive and lymphoedema cases.
Comparison of day and night parasitological indices of ICT positive individuals.
|
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day | Night | Day | Night | ||||||
| Examined (n) | Mf positive (%) | Mf GMI (Mf/ml) | Mf positive (%) | Mf GMI (Mf/ml) | Mf positive (%) | Mf GMI (Mf/ml) | Mf positive (%) | Mf GMI (Mf/ml) | |
|
| |||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Batouri-HD | 6 | 6 | 12371.5 | 6 | 1242.7 | 6 | 131 | 6 | 265.7 |
| Messamena-HD | 4 | 1 | 30160 | 1 | 280 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 40 |
|
| |||||||||
| Nwa-HD | 13 | 10 | 14591.0 | 9 | 1261.8 | 0 | - | 0 | - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 1 ICT positive (South-west1 site) did not participate to the night blood examination.
Comparison of day and night parasitological indices in lymphoedema cases.
|
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day | Night | Day | Night | ||||||
| Examined (n) | Mf positive (%) | Mf GMI (Mf/ml) | Mf positive (%) | Mf GMI (Mf/ml) | Mf positive (%) | Mf GMI (Mf/ml) | Mf positive (%) | Mf GMI (Mf/ml) | |
|
| |||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Batouri-HD | 2 | 0 | - | 0 | - | 0 | - | 0 | - |
| Messamena-HD | 7 | 5 | 161.7 | 1 | 1060 | 6 | 494.4 | 5 | 562.8 |
|
| |||||||||
| Nwa-HD | 11 | 6 | 341.1 | 1 | 60 | 0 | - | 0 | - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. loa and M. perstans Mf periodicity with respect to microfilarial load ranges of ICT positive individuals.
|
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mf load ranges (Mf/ml) | Examined (n) | Day+/ Night+ | Day+/ Night- | Day-/Night- | Day-/Night+ | Examined (n) | Day+/ Night+ | Day-/Night- |
| 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| 1–8000 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0 |
| 8001–30000 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| > 30000 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. loa and M. perstans Mf periodicity with respect to microfilarial load ranges of lymphoedema cases.
|
| Examined (n) |
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mf load ranges (Mf/ml) | Examined (n) | Day+/ Night+ | Day+/ Night- | Day-/Night- | Day+/ Night+ | Day+/Night- | Day-/Night- | |
| 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 14 |
| 1–8000 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infection profile of ICT positives cases with respect to L. loa and M. perstans infection status using day blood.
| Infection status | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health district | Examined (n) |
|
|
|
|
| East-Batouri | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| East-Messamena | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Northwest-Nwa | 13 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 0 |
| Southwest 1—Kumba | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infection profile of lymphoedema cases with respect to L. loa and M. perstans infection status using day blood.
| Infection status | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health district | Examined (n) | Loa+/Pers+ | Loa+/Pers- | Loa-/Pers- | Loa-/Pers+ |
| East-Batouri | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| East-Messamena | 7 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Northwest-Nwa | 11 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of positive results using ICT card according to the L. loa load of microfilariae.
| ICT card | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microfilariae/mL of blood | Positives | % | Negatives | Total |
| 0 | 6 | 0.3 | 1812 | 1818 |
| 1–8000 | 3 | 1.0 | 308 | 311 |
| 8001–30000 | 10 | 20.4 | 39 | 49 |
| > 30000 | 5 | 41.7 | 7 | 12 |
R = 0.438; p < 0.001
Association between ICT results and L. loa / M. perstans positivity rates.
| ICT Results | Statistics | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | Total | OR | 95%CI | P-value | |
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 (0.3) | 1812(99.7) | 1818 | - | - | - |
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 (0.9) | 1688 (99.1) | 1704 | - | - | - |
Numbers in brackets are percentages.
Logistic regression analysis of ICT results according to L. loa load among the Mf carriers.
| ICT Results | Statistics | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Positive | Negative | Total | OR | 95%CI | P-value |
| 1–8,000 | 3 (1) | 308(99) | 311 | 2.9 | 0.7–11.8 | 0.128 |
| 8,001–30,000 | 10 (20.4) | 39(79.6) | 49 | 77.4 | 26.8–223.7 | < 0.001 |
| > 30,000 | 5 (41.7) | 7(58.3) | 12 | 215.7 | 53.2–874.6 | < 0.000 |
Numbers in brackets are percentages.
Fig 4Correlation between ICT positivity rate and L. loa Mf prevalence.
Fig 5Correlation between ICT positivity rate and M. perstans Mf prevalence.