| Literature DB >> 28228160 |
Sammy M Njenga1, Henry M Kanyi2, Faith M Mutungi2, Collins Okoyo2, Hadley S Matendechero3, Rachel L Pullan4, Katherine E Halliday4, Simon J Brooker4, C Njeri Wamae5, Joyce K Onsongo6, Kimberly Y Won7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is a debilitating disease associated with extensive disfigurement and is one of a diverse group of diseases referred to as neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) which mainly occur among the poorest populations. In line with global recommendations to eliminate LF, Kenya launched its LF elimination programme in 2002 with the aim to implement annual mass drug administration (MDA) in order to interrupt LF transmission. However, the programme faced financial and administrative challenges over the years such that sustained annual MDA was not possible. Recently, there has been renewed interest to eliminate LF and the Kenyan Ministry of Health, through support from World Health Organization (WHO), restarted annual MDA in 2015. The objective of this study was to evaluate the current status of LF infection in the endemic coastal region of Kenya before MDA campaigns were restarted.Entities:
Keywords: Circulating filarial antigen; Cross-sectional study; ICT test; Kenya; Lymphatic filariasis; Microfilariae; Transmission assessment; Wuchereria bancrofti
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28228160 PMCID: PMC5322668 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-017-2044-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1A map of the coastal region showing the location of the ten sentinel sites and lymphatic filariasis prevalence (%) levels by immunochromatographic test. The highest prevalence of lymphatic filariasis infection was detected in Ndau Island in Lamu County
Demographic characteristics and filarial prevalence (%) by ICT test in 10 sentinel sites, coastal Kenya, October 2015
| Demographic | 2015 Population projections | Sentinel sites |
| CFA prevalence (%) (95% CI) | Multivariable logistic | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| aOR (95% CI)a |
| |||||
| County | ||||||
| Kwale | 792,698 | 3 | 877 (29.5) | 1.1 (0.6–2.1) | – | – |
| Kilifi | 1,307,185 | 3 | 911 (30.6) | 0.9 (0.4–1.8) | – | – |
| Tana River | 292,885 | 2 | 593 (19.9) | 0 | – | – |
| Lamu | 123,842 | 1 | 320 (10.8) | 6.3 (4.1–9.7) | – | – |
| Taita-Taveta | 347,195 | 1 | 275 (9.2) | 0 | – | – |
| All counties | 2,863,805 | 10 | 2,976 | 1.3 (0.9–1.8) | – | – |
| Sex | ||||||
| Male | – | 10 | 1,260 (42.3) | 1.5 (0.9–2.4) | 1.58 (0.85–2.95) | 0.148 |
| Female | – | 10 | 1,716 (57.7) | 1.1 (0.7–1.7) | Reference | |
| Age group | ||||||
| < 10 | – | 10 | 865 (29.1) | 0.7 (0.3–1.7) | Reference | |
| 10–17 | – | 10 | 609 (20.5) | 0.2 (0–1.2) | 0.23 (0.03–2.05) | 0.188 |
| ≥ 18 | – | 10 | 1,502 (50.5) | 2.1 (1.5–2.9) | 3.12 (1.16–8.43) | 0.024* |
| LLIN use | ||||||
| Yes | – | 10 | 2,647 (88.9) | 1.1 (0.8–1.6) | 0.40 (0.19–0.86) | 0.019* |
| No | – | 10 | 329 (11.1) | 2.7 (1.4–5.2) | Reference | |
aAdjusted odds ratios (aOR) were obtained by mutually adjusting all minimum generated variables using multivariable mixed effects logistic regression at 95% CI taking into account households and county levels
*P < 0.05
Surveyed households and sentinel site level circulating filarial antigen (CFA) prevalence (%), coastal Kenya, October 2015
| County/Village | Households | No. CFA positive/No. examined | Prevalence (%) (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kwale County | |||
| Makwenyeni | 69 | 5/297 | 1.7 (0.7–3.9) |
| Mwadimu | 67 | 5/290 | 1.7 (0.7–4.0) |
| Mirihini | 52 | 0/290 | 0 |
| Kilifi County | |||
| Kinarani | 94 | 1/307 | 0.3 (0–2.4) |
| Jaribuni | 93 | 2/298 | 0.7 (0.2–2.6) |
| Masindeni | 96 | 5/306 | 1.7 (0.7–3.9) |
| Tana River County | |||
| Mikinduni | 75 | 0/294 | 0 |
| Kipini | 83 | 0/299 | 0 |
| Lamu County | |||
| Ndau | 105 | 20/320 | 6.3 (4.1–9.7) |
| Taita-Taveta County | |||
| Kimorigo | 94 | 0/275 | 0 |
| All villages | 828 | 38/2,976 | 1.3 (0.9–1.9) |
Sentinel site microfilariae prevalence (%) and mean intensity (MF/ml), coastal Kenya, October 2015
| Village | No. CFA positive/No. examined | No. examined for MFa | No. MF positive | Mean intensityb (MF/ml) (95% CI) | MF prevalencec (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kwale County | |||||
| Makwenyeni | 5/297 | 5 | 1 | 22 (3–156) | 0.3 (0–2.4) |
| Mwadimu | 5/290 | 4 | 1 | 10 (1–71) | 0.3 (0–2.4) |
| Mirihini | 0/290 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kilifi County | |||||
| Kinarani | 1/307 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jaribuni | 2/298 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Masindeni | 5/306 | 4 | 1 | 5 (1–35) | 0.3 (0–2.4) |
| Tana River County | |||||
| Mikinduni | 0/294 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kipini | 0/299 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lamu County | |||||
| Ndau | 20/320 | 19 | 6 | 234 (62–880) | 1.9 (0.9–4.1) |
| Taita Taveta County | |||||
| Kimorigo | 0/275 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| All villages | 38/2,976 | 33 | 9 | 140 (39–502) | 0.3 (0.2–0.6) |
aOnly CFA positive individuals were examined for MF by microscopy
bThe mean intensity of MF was calculated among the CFA positive participants only
cAll CFA negative individuals were assumed to be negative for MF and thus included in the calculation of MF prevalence
Bed net ownership and usage by sentinel village, coastal Kenya, October 2015
| Village | Proportion possessing at least one LLIN % (95% CI) | LLIN usage, previous night % (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
| Makwenyeni | 99.7 (99.0–100) | 89.2 (84.0–94.4) |
| Mwadimu | 95.1 (90.8–99.3) | 73.3 (63.8–82.7) |
| Mirihini | 91.5 (84.2–98.7) | 89.5 (82.0–96.9) |
| Kinarani | 97.4 (91.2–99.6) | 89.6 (83.9–95.4) |
| Jaribuni | 99.5 (98.6–100) | 92.7 (88.1–97.3) |
| Masindeni | 98.4 (93.0–99.1) | 88.1 (82.8–93.5) |
| Mikinduni | 99.0 (95.8–100) | 93.6 (89.5–97.7) |
| Kipini | 100 (98.6–100) | 99.5 (98.5–100) |
| Ndau | 98.7 (96.7–100) | 75.0 (67.9–82.1) |
| Kimorigo | 96.7 (94.2–99.3) | 96.7 (94.4–99.0) |
| All villages | 97.6 (96.6–98.5) | 88.8 (87.0–90.7) |
MDA implementation in Coastal Kenya showing overall treatment coverage (%), 2002–2015
| County | 2002 | 2003 | 2005 | 2008 | 2011 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kilifi | MDA | MDA | MDA | MDA | MDA | MDA |
| (Malindi) | MDA | MDA | MDA | MDA | MDA | |
| Kwale | MDA | MDA | MDA | MDA | MDA | |
| Tana River | MDA | MDA | ||||
| Lamu | MDA | MDA | ||||
| Taita-Taveta | ||||||
| Programme (drug) coverage | 81.2 | 79.5 | 72.3 | 62.7 | 58.3 | 54.3 |
The original IUs have been revised due to several changes in administrative structures. Malindi is currently a sub-county in Kilifi County. Source: WHO preventive chemotherapy database (WHO/PCT databank) http://www.who.int/neglected_diseases/preventive_chemotherapy/lf/en/ Accessed 06/11/2016