Literature DB >> 2654335

Chemonucleolysis versus discectomy: a randomized multicenter trial.

H A van Alphen1, R Braakman, P D Bezemer, G Broere, M W Berfelo.   

Abstract

A randomized clinical trial was carried out to compare the results of open discectomy with those of chemonucleolysis in 151 patients suffering from a disc herniation at L4-5 or L5-S1. All patients fulfilled strict entry criteria; 78 patients underwent open discectomy and 73 were subjected to chemonucleolysis. An increase in radicular pain immediately after treatment was encountered in 16 patients (22%) in the chemonucleolysis group, as compared to none in the discectomy group. The efficacy of discectomy appeared to be definitely superior to that of chemonucleolysis. Within a follow-up period of 1 year, 18 patients (25%) required open discectomy following failed chemonucleolysis; two patients (3%) in the discectomy group needed a second operation. Open discectomy following previous chemonucleolysis was successful in only 44% of cases. Comparison of the final results of the two modes of treatment 12 months after the last intervention (including second treatment) did not reveal any significant differences. The duration of the preoperative symptoms, the level of disc herniation, and the leakage of contrast medium out of the disc appeared to be of no relevance to the final outcome. The complication rates in both treatment groups were low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2654335     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1989.70.6.0869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  12 in total

Review 1.  [Nucleolysis in the herniated disk].

Authors:  T Lehnert; S Mundackatharappel; W Schwarz; S Bisdas; A Wetter; C Herzog; J O Balzer; M G Mack; T J Vogl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  Outcome of invasive treatment modalities on back pain and sciatica: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Maurits W van Tulder; Bart Koes; Seppo Seitsalo; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Surgical interventions for lumbar disc prolapse.

Authors:  J N A Gibson; G Waddell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18

4.  Spinal surgery.

Authors:  R Johnston
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Surgery for herniated lumbar discs: a literature synthesis.

Authors:  R M Hoffman; K J Wheeler; R A Deyo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  Efficacy of lumbar discectomy and percutaneous treatments for lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  C D Stevens; R W Dubois; T Larequi-Lauber; J P Vader
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1997

7.  Surgical treatments for lumbar disc disease in adolescent patients; chemonucleolysis / microsurgical discectomy/ PLIF with cages.

Authors:  Sung-Uk Kuh; Young-Soo Kim; Young-Eun Cho; Young-Sul Yoon; Byung-Ho Jin; Keun-Su Kim; Dong-Kyu Chin
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 8.  Injection therapy and denervation procedures for chronic low-back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicholas Henschke; Ton Kuijpers; Sidney M Rubinstein; Marienke van Middelkoop; Raymond Ostelo; Arianne Verhagen; Bart W Koes; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  A review of current treatment for lumbar disc herniation in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Lei Dang; Zhongjun Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Minimally invasive surgical procedures for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Dagmar Lühmann; Tatjana Burkhardt-Hammer; Cathleen Borowski; Heiner Raspe
Journal:  GMS Health Technol Assess       Date:  2005-11-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.