Literature DB >> 26542867

Timing of surgery for open reduction and internal fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures.

Georg Siebenbürger1, Dustin Van Delden1, Tobias Helfen1, Florian Haasters1, Wolfgang Böcker1, Ben Ockert2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Open reduction and internal fixation is one established method for treatment of displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. However, the timing of surgery and its effect on complications have not yet been investigated in the literature. Hence, aim of this study was to analyze the occurrence of complication following locked plating of proximal humeral fractures when surgery was delayed in comparison to early intervention.
METHODS: Between February 2002 and November 2010, 497 patients with displaced proximal humeral fractures were treated by open reduction and locked plating. 329 patients were available for follow-up with a minimum of 12 months after surgery. Outcome analysis included radiographic evidence of loss of fixation (> 10° of secondary displacement), screw-cutout and avascular head necrosis. Outcomes were analyzed with regards to age, gender and fracture pattern and were compared between time intervals in which the primary surgery had been conducted; early intervention (< 48 h), timely scheduled for surgery (3-5 days) and delayed intervention (>5 days).
RESULTS: Of 329 patients (68.4% women; median age at time of surgery: 69.9 years, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 68.2, 71.2) the median time between fracture incident and surgical intervention was 3.2 days (95%CI: 3.1, 3.3). Surgery was performed in a 2-part fracture at a median of 3.3 days (95%CI: 3.2, 3.4) after trauma, in a 3-part fracture after 3.3 days (95%CI: 3.1, 3.4), in a 4-part fracture 2.9 days (95%CI: 2.8, 3.0), in head split type fracture 2.2 days (95%CI: 2.0, 2.4) and in dislocation type fracture 0.8 days after trauma (95%CI: 0.7, 0.9, p = 0.40). Loss of fixation was observed in 12.8% (n = 42 patients), of which in 4.9% (n = 16) screw cutout was evident and in 6.8% of cases (n = 20) avascular head necrosis was diagnosed. Patients in which complication was observed were treated at median 2.5 days after trauma (95% CI, 1.8, 3.2), in comparison, patients without evidence of complications were treated at a median of 3.2 days (95% CI, 2.8-3.8, p = 0.35). The odds ratio regarding occurrence of complications for patients treated <48 hours was 0,924, for patients in which surgery was performed 3-5 days after the incident the odds ratio was 0,836 and in patients treated > 5 days the odds ratio was 1,637.
CONCLUSIONS: Loss of fixation following open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures was not more frequently observed when surgery was performed 3-5 days after the incident in comparison to early intervention (< 48 h). However, a delay of intervention > 5 days is related to significant increase of complications. Thus, if open reduction and internal fixation is indicated, reconstruction of the proximal humerus should be performed within 5 days of the fracture event. In head split and dislocated fracture types anatomic reconstruction completed within 48 h from the incident may be beneficial with regards to risk of avascular necrosis.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  angular stable plating; complication; delay of intervention; locked plating; osteosynthesis; outcome; proximal humerus fracture; timing of surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26542867     DOI: 10.1016/S0020-1383(15)30019-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  13 in total

1.  Orthopaedic surgeons' opinions surrounding the management of proximal humerus fractures: an international survey.

Authors:  Lauren L Nowak; Milena R Vicente; Michael D McKee; Jeremy A Hall; Aaron Nauth; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Outcomes following non operative management for proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Al-Achraf Khoriati; Tony Antonios; Nik Bakti; Paras Mohanlal; Bijayendra Singh
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-03-03

3.  Nonoperative Treatment for Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures in Elderly Patients: Correlation Between Deviations and Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Mauro Emilio Conforto Gracitelli; Gustavo Jum Yamamoto; Eduardo Angeli Malavolta; Fernando Brandão Andrade-Silva; Kodi Edson Kojima; Arnaldo Amado Ferreira Neto
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2020-11-02

4.  Protective and Risk Factors for Humerus Head Necrosis After Proximal Humerus Fracture Treated with Internal Locking Plate.

Authors:  Tomas Da Silva; David-Benjamin Ehrhard; Theo Manuel Chuchuy; Christian Knop; Tobias Merkle
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 1.033

5.  Complication rate after operative treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus: locking plate osteosynthesis versus proximal humeral nail.

Authors:  Greta Lorenz; Wolfgang Schönthaler; Wolfgang Huf; Micha Komjati; Christian Fialka; Sandra Boesmueller
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  A Simple Procedure for the Evaluation of Bone Vitality by Staining with a Tetrazolium Salt.

Authors:  René Schiffner; Juliane Reiche; Steffen Brodt; Olaf Brinkmann; Matthias Bungartz; Georg Matziolis; Martin Schmidt
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Ischaemia, healing and outcomes in proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Simon M Lambert
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-05-21

8.  Rate of avascular necrosis after fracture dislocations of the proximal humerus: Timing of surgery.

Authors:  Marc Schnetzke; Julia Bockmeyer; Markus Loew; Stefan Studier-Fischer; Paul-Alfred Grützner; Thorsten Guehring
Journal:  Obere Extrem       Date:  2018-03-07

9.  Treatment of distal clavicle fractures using a Scorpion plate and influence of timing on surgical outcomes: a retrospective cohort study of 105 cases.

Authors:  Ryogo Furuhata; Masaaki Takahashi; Teppei Hayashi; Miyu Inagawa; Aki Kono; Noboru Matsumura; Yusaku Kamata; Hiroshi Arino; Hideo Morioka
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Humeral Tip-apex-distance as a Prognostic Marker for Proximal Humeral Fractures in 203 Patients.

Authors:  Dominik Saul; Tobias Himmelmann; Klaus Dresing
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2017-04-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.