Literature DB >> 26542858

PMMA-augmented SI screw: a biomechanical analysis of stiffness and pull-out force in a matched paired human cadaveric model.

Stephan Grechenig1, Axel Gänsslen2, Boyko Gueorguiev3, Arne Berner4, Michael Müller4, Michael Nerlich4, Paul Schmitz4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Current literature data and clinical experience show that the number of pelvic fractures continuously rises due to the increasing elderly population. In the elderly with suspected osteoporosis additional implant augmentation with bone cement seems to be an option to avoid secondary displacement. There are no reported biomechanical data in the literature comparing the fixation strength (and anchorage) of standard and augmented SI screws so far. The purpose of this study was to assess the biomechanical performance of cement-augmented versus non-augmented SI screws in a human cadaveric pelvis model.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six human cadaveric pelvises preserved with the method of Thiel were used in this study. Each pelvis was split to a pair of 2 hemi-pelvises, assigned to 2 different groups for instrumentation with one non-augmented or one contralateral cement-augmented SI screw, placed in the body of S1 in a randomized fashion. The osteosynthesis followed a standard procedure with 3D controlled percutaneous iliosacral screw positioning. A biomechanical setup for a quasistatic pullout test of each SI screw was used. Construct stiffness and maximum pullout force were calculated from the load-displacement curve of the machine data. Statistical evaluation was performed at a level of significance p = .05 for all statistical tests.
RESULTS: Stiffness and pullout force in the augmented group (501.6 N/mm ± 123.7, 1336.8 N ± 221.1) were significantly higher than in the non-augmented one (289.7 N/mm ± 97.1, 597.7 N ± 115.5), p = .04 and p = .014, respectively. BMD influenced significantly the pullout force in all study groups.
CONCLUSION: Cement augmentation significantly increased the fixation strength in iliosacral screw osteosynthesis of the sacrum in a biomechanical human cadaveric model.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SI-screw; augmentation; biomechanics; pelvic ring fracture

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26542858     DOI: 10.1016/S0020-1383(15)30031-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  8 in total

1.  Clinical application of a minimally invasive cement-augmentable Schanz screw rod system to treat pelvic ring fractures.

Authors:  Paul Schmitz; Florian Baumann; Yves P Acklin; Boyko Gueorguiev; Michael Nerlich; Stephan Grechenig; Michael Bernd Müller
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  [Cement augmentation in pelvic ring fractures].

Authors:  Andreas E Ellmerer; Markus A Küper; Mika F Rollmann; Steven C Herath; Tina Histing
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-05-23

Review 3.  [Cement augmentation and bone graft substitutes-Materials and biomechanics].

Authors:  Boyko Gueorguiev; Mark Lenz
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-04-29

4.  Cement Augmentation in Sacroiliac Screw Fixation Offers Modest Biomechanical Advantages in a Cadaver Model.

Authors:  Georg Osterhoff; Andrew E Dodd; Florence Unno; Angus Wong; Shahram Amiri; Kelly A Lefaivre; Pierre Guy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Symphyseal fixation in open book injuries cannot fully compensate anterior SI joint injury-A biomechanical study in a two-leg alternating load model.

Authors:  Fabian M Stuby; Mark Lenz; Stefan Doebele; Yash Agarwal; Hristo Skulev; Björn G Ochs; Jörn Zwingmann; Boyko Gueorguiev
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Is cement-augmented sacroiliac screw fixation with partially threaded screws superior to that with fully threaded screws concerning compression and pull-out force in fragility fractures of the sacrum? - a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Juliana Hack; Maiwand Safi; Martin Bäumlein; Julia Lenz; Christopher Bliemel; Steffen Ruchholtz; Ludwig Oberkircher
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Does augmentation increase the pull-out force of symphyseal screws? A biomechanical cadaver study.

Authors:  Adrian Cavalcanti Kußmaul; Fanny Schwaabe; Christopher Alexander Becker; Christian Kleber; Christoph Linhart; Christoph Thorwächter; Bianka Rubenbauer; Wolfgang Böcker; Axel Greiner
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.374

8.  Does Cement Augmentation of the Sacroiliac Screw Lead to Superior Biomechanical Results for Fixation of the Posterior Pelvic Ring? A Biomechanical Study.

Authors:  Moritz F Lodde; J Christoph Katthagen; Clemens O Schopper; Ivan Zderic; R Geoff Richards; Boyko Gueorguiev; Michael J Raschke; René Hartensuer
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 2.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.