Literature DB >> 26542503

Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio versus Fractional Flow Reserve guided intervention (iFR-SWEDEHEART): Rationale and design of a multicenter, prospective, registry-based randomized clinical trial.

Matthias Götberg1, Evald H Christiansen2, Ingibjörg Gudmundsdottir3, Lennart Sandhall4, Elmir Omerovic5, Stefan K James6, David Erlinge7, Ole Fröbert8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) is a new hemodynamic resting index for assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity. iFR uses high frequency sampling to calculate a gradient across a coronary lesion during a period of diastole. The index has been tested against fractional flow reserve (FFR) and found to have an overall classification agreement of 80% to 85%. Whether the level of disagreement is clinically relevant is unknown. Clinical outcome data on iFR are scarce. This study is a registry-based randomized clinical trial, which is a novel strategy using health quality registries as on-line platforms for randomization, case record forms, and follow-up. DESIGN/
METHODS: iFR-SWEDEHEART is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical open-label clinical trial. Two thousand patients with stable angina or acute coronary syndrome and an indication for physiology-guided assessment of one or more coronary stenoses will be randomized 1:1 to either iFR- or FFR-guided intervention. The randomization will be conducted online in the Swedish web-based system for enhancement and development of evidence-based care in heart disease evaluated according to recommended therapies (SWEDEHEART) registry. The trial has a non-inferiority design, with a primary combined end point of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and unplanned revascularization at 12 months. End points will be identified through national registries and undergo central blind adjudication to ensure data quality. DISCUSSION: The iFR-SWEDEHEART trial is an registry-based randomized clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of the diagnostic method iFR compared to FFR.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26542503     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.07.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  9 in total

1.  Fractional Flow Reserve: Does a Cut-off Value add Value?

Authors:  Shah R Mohdnazri; Thomas R Keeble; Andrew Sp Sharp
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2016-05

Review 2.  Fractional flow reserve computed tomography in the evaluation of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Shaw Hua Kueh; Matthew Boroditsky; Jonathon Leipsic
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-10

Review 3.  Three Technologies That Will Guide Revascularization of Chronic Coronary Syndrome Patients into the 21st Century: A Review.

Authors:  Michael A Winkler; Ripa Patel; Weibo Fu; Vishal Arora; Neal L Weintraub
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2021-08-25

4.  Hybrid Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio-Fractional Flow Reserve versus Fractional Flow Reserve in the Real World.

Authors:  Kara Shuttleworth; Kristina Smith; Jonathan Watt; Jamie A L Smith; Stephen J Leslie
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-05-30

5.  Coronary physiology revisited.

Authors:  J J Piek
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Fractional flow reserve, quantitative flow ratio, and instantaneous wave-free ratio: a comparison of the procedure-related dose of ionising radiation.

Authors:  Greta Ziubryte; Gediminas Jarusevicius
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 1.426

Review 7.  Physiologic Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease: Focus on Fractional Flow Reserve.

Authors:  Doyeon Hwang; Joo Myung Lee; Bon-Kwon Koo
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 8.  Diagnostic performance of instantaneous wave-free ratio for the evaluation of coronary stenosis severity confirmed by fractional flow reserve: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of randomized studies.

Authors:  Wanrong Man; Jianqiang Hu; Zhijing Zhao; Mingming Zhang; Tingting Wang; Jie Lin; Yu Duan; Ling Wang; Haichang Wang; Dongdong Sun; Yan Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Fractional Flow Reserve/Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Discordance in Angiographically Intermediate Coronary Stenoses: An Analysis Using Doppler-Derived Coronary Flow Measurements.

Authors:  Christopher M Cook; Allen Jeremias; Ricardo Petraco; Sayan Sen; Sukhjinder Nijjer; Matthew J Shun-Shin; Yousif Ahmad; Guus de Waard; Tim van de Hoef; Mauro Echavarria-Pinto; Martijn van Lavieren; Rasha Al Lamee; Yuetsu Kikuta; Yasutsugu Shiono; Ashesh Buch; Martijn Meuwissen; Ibrahim Danad; Paul Knaapen; Akiko Maehara; Bon-Kwon Koo; Gary S Mintz; Javier Escaned; Gregg W Stone; Darrel P Francis; Jamil Mayet; Jan J Piek; Niels van Royen; Justin E Davies
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 11.195

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.