Paul G Toomey1, Anthony F Teta1, Krishen D Patel1, Sharona B Ross1, Alexander S Rosemurgy2. 1. Department of General Surgery, Florida Hospital Tampa, 3000 Medical Park Drive Suite 310, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA. 2. Department of General Surgery, Florida Hospital Tampa, 3000 Medical Park Drive Suite 310, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA. Electronic address: arosemurgy@hotmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High-volume hospitals are purported to provide "best" outcomes. We undertook this study to evaluate the outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy when high-volume surgeons relocate to a low-volume hospital (ie, no pancreaticoduodenectomies in >5 years). METHODS: Outcomes after the last 50 pancreaticoduodenectomies undertaken at a high-volume hospital in 2012 (ie, before relocation) were compared with the outcomes after the first 50 pancreaticoduodenectomies undertaken at a low-volume hospital (ie, after relocation) in 2012 to 2013. RESULTS: Patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomies at a high-volume vs a low-volume hospital were not different by age or sex. Patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at the low-volume hospital had shorter operations with less blood loss, spent less time in the intensive care unit, and had shorter length of stay (P < .05 for each); 30-day mortality and 30-day readmission rates were not different. CONCLUSIONS: The salutary benefits of undertaking pancreaticoduodenectomy at a high-volume hospital are transferred to a low-volume hospital when high-volume surgeons relocate. The "best" results follow high-volume surgeons.
BACKGROUND: High-volume hospitals are purported to provide "best" outcomes. We undertook this study to evaluate the outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy when high-volume surgeons relocate to a low-volume hospital (ie, no pancreaticoduodenectomies in >5 years). METHODS: Outcomes after the last 50 pancreaticoduodenectomies undertaken at a high-volume hospital in 2012 (ie, before relocation) were compared with the outcomes after the first 50 pancreaticoduodenectomies undertaken at a low-volume hospital (ie, after relocation) in 2012 to 2013. RESULTS:Patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomies at a high-volume vs a low-volume hospital were not different by age or sex. Patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at the low-volume hospital had shorter operations with less blood loss, spent less time in the intensive care unit, and had shorter length of stay (P < .05 for each); 30-day mortality and 30-day readmission rates were not different. CONCLUSIONS: The salutary benefits of undertaking pancreaticoduodenectomy at a high-volume hospital are transferred to a low-volume hospital when high-volume surgeons relocate. The "best" results follow high-volume surgeons.
Authors: Francisco Igor B Macedo; Prakash Jayanthi; Mia Mowzoon; Danny Yakoub; Vikas Dudeja; Nipun Merchant Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2017-07-25 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Joseph K Canner; Omar Harfouch; Lisa M Kodadek; Danielle Pelaez; Devin Coon; Anaeze C Offodile; Adil H Haider; Brandyn D Lau Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Ambar Mehta; Tim Xu; Susan Hutfless; Martin A Makary; Abdulrahman K Sinno; Edward J Tanner; Rebecca L Stone; Karen Wang; Amanda N Fader Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2016-12-26 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Lorraine I Kelley-Quon; Eveline Shue; Rita V Burke; Caitlin Smith; Karen Kling; Elaa Mahdi; Shadassa Ourshalimian; Michael Fenlon; Matthew Dellinger; Stephen B Shew; Justin Lee; Benjamin Padilla; Thomas Inge; Jonathan Roach; Ahmed I Marwan; Katie W Russell; Romeo Ignacio; Elizabeth Fialkowski; Amar Nijagal; Cecilia Im; Kenneth S Azarow; Daniel J Ostlie; Kasper Wang Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2021-12-02 Impact factor: 1.827