Literature DB >> 26541917

Predictors and impact of myocardial injury after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a multicenter registry.

Henrique B Ribeiro1, Luis Nombela-Franco2, Antonio J Muñoz-García3, Pedro Alves Lemos4, Ignacio Amat-Santos5, Vicenç Serra6, Fabio S de Brito7, Alexandre Abizaid8, Rogério Sarmento-Leite9, Rishi Puri1, Asim N Cheema10, Marc Ruel11, Fabian Nietlispach12, Francesco Maisano12, Cesar Moris13, Raquel Del Valle13, Marina Urena1, Omar Abdul Jawad Altisent1, Maria Del Trigo1, Francisco Campelo-Parada1, Pilar Jimenez Quevedo2, Juan H Alonso-Briales3, Hipólito Gutiérrez5, Bruno García Del Blanco6, Marco Antonio Perin7, Dimytri Siqueira8, Guilherme Bernardi9, Éric Dumont1, Melanie Côté1, Philippe Pibarot1, Josep Rodés-Cabau14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac biomarker release signifying myocardial injury post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is common, yet its clinical impact within a large TAVR cohort receiving differing types of valve and procedural approaches is unknown.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the incidence, clinical impact, and factors associated with cardiac biomarker elevation post TAVR.
METHODS: This multicenter study included 1,131 consecutive patients undergoing TAVR with balloon-expandable (58%) or self-expandable (42%) valves. Transfemoral and transapical (TA) approaches were selected in 73.1% and 20.3% of patients, respectively. Creatine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB) measurements were obtained at baseline and at several time points within the initial 72 h post TAVR. Echocardiography was performed at baseline and at 6- to 12-month follow-up.
RESULTS: Overall, 66% of the TAVR population demonstrated some degree of myocardial injury as determined by a rise in CK-MB levels (peak value: 1.6-fold [interquartile range (IQR): 0.9 to 2.8-fold]). A TA approach and major procedural complications were independently associated with higher peak of CK-MB levels (p < 0.01 for all), which translated into impaired systolic left ventricular function at 6 to 12 months post TAVR (p < 0.01). A greater rise in CK-MB levels independently associated with an increased 30-day, late (median of 21 [IQR: 8 to 36] months) overall and cardiovascular mortality (p < 0.001 for all). Any increase in CK-MB levels was associated with poorer clinical outcomes, and there was a stepwise rise in late mortality according to the various degrees of CK-MB increase after TAVR (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Some degree of myocardial injury was detected in two-thirds of patients post TAVR, especially in those undergoing TA-TAVR or presenting with major procedural complications. A greater rise in CK-MB levels associated with greater acute and late mortality, imparting a negative impact on left ventricular function.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic stenosis; cardiac biomarkers; creatine kinase-MB; transapical; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26541917     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  11 in total

1.  Intrepid steps towards clinical prime time.

Authors:  Rodrigo Mendirichaga; Vikas Singh
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Future of transcatheter aortic valve implantation - evolving clinical indications.

Authors:  Rishi Puri; Chekrallah Chamandi; Tania Rodriguez-Gabella; Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Predictors and Prognostic Implications of Myocardial Injury After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Murat Can Guney; Telat Keles; Bilge Duran Karaduman; Huseyin Ayhan; Hakan Suygun; Muzaffer Kahyaoglu; Engin Bozkurt
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2022-07-01

Review 4.  Challenges and opportunities in improving left ventricular remodelling and clinical outcome following surgical and trans-catheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Xu Yu Jin; Mario Petrou; Jiang Ting Hu; Ed D Nicol; John R Pepper
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 5.  Transcatheter Mitral Valve Therapy: Defining the Patient Who Will Benefit.

Authors:  Marvin H Eng; Dee Dee Wang
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  How TAVI registries report clinical outcomes-A systematic review of endpoints based on VARC-2 definitions.

Authors:  Shixuan Zhang; Peter L Kolominsky-Rabas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Early Experience With Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  David Del Val; Alfredo Nunes Ferreira-Neto; Jerome Wintzer-Wehekind; François Dagenais; Jean-Michel Paradis; Mathieu Bernier; Kim O'Connor; Jonathan Beaudoin; Afonso B Freitas-Ferraz; Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 5.501

8.  Prognostically Significant Myocardial Injury in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Vikram Sharma; Tanujit Dey; Kesavan Sankaramangalam; Shehab A R Alansari; Louis Williams; Stephanie Mick; Amar Krishnaswamy; Lars G Svensson; Samir Kapadia
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Can Blood Biomarkers Help Predicting Outcome in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation?

Authors:  Cécile Oury; Alain Nchimi; Patrizio Lancellotti; Jutta Bergler-Klein
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-03-28

10.  Impact of bioprosthetic valve type on peri-procedural myocardial injury and mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Vincenzo De Marzo; Gabriele Crimi; Matteo Vercellino; Stefano Benenati; Fabio Pescetelli; Roberta Della Bona; Matteo Sarocchi; Marco Canepa; Manrico Balbi; Italo Porto
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.