Karen D Wright1, Vinay M Daryani1, David C Turner1, Arzu Onar-Thomas1, Nidal Boulos1, Brent A Orr1, Richard J Gilbertson1, Clinton F Stewart1, Amar Gajjar1. 1. Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee (K.D.W., R.J.G., A.G.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee (V.M.D., D.C.T., C.F.S); Department of Biostatistics, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee (A.O.-T.); Department of Developmental Neurobiology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee (N.B., R.J.G.); Department of Pathology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee (B.A.O.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We report a phase I study to examine the pharmacokinetics, safety, and recommended dosage of weekly intravenous bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in children and young adults with recurrent ependymoma. METHODS: Patients 22 years of age or less with recurrent ependymoma were treated with bolus dosage 5-FU weekly for 4 weeks followed by a 2-week rest period, defining one cycle. Patients could continue on therapy for 16 cycles. The starting 5-FU dosage was 500 mg/m(2). Dose-limiting toxicity was determined after one cycle. Patients were initially enrolled according to a rolling-6 design; subsequent dose re-escalation phase was based on a 3 + 3 design. RESULTS: We treated patients at 400 (n = 6), 500 (n = 15), and 650 (n = 5) mg/m(2), with de-escalation due to toxicity. Twenty-three of twenty-six patients enrolled were evaluable. Five patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia (n = 2: 650 mg/m(2); n = 3: 500 mg/m(2)). One patient experienced grade 3 diarrhea. At 500 mg/m(2), the median 5-FU maximal concentration, AUC0-∞, and alpha half-life were 825 µM, 205 µM × h, and 9.9 min, respectively. Interim analysis revealed an association between hematologic toxicity and prior number of chemotherapeutic regimens (P = .03). The study was amended to re-escalate the dosage in a less heavily pretreated cohort of patients. CONCLUSIONS: These phase I clinical data provide initial pharmacokinetic parameters to describe i.v. bolus 5-FU disposition in children with recurrent ependymoma. Tumor exposures effective in preclinical testing can be achieved with tolerable bolus dosages in patients. Bolus 5-FU is well tolerated and possesses antitumor activity.
BACKGROUND: We report a phase I study to examine the pharmacokinetics, safety, and recommended dosage of weekly intravenous bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in children and young adults with recurrent ependymoma. METHODS:Patients 22 years of age or less with recurrent ependymoma were treated with bolus dosage 5-FU weekly for 4 weeks followed by a 2-week rest period, defining one cycle. Patients could continue on therapy for 16 cycles. The starting 5-FU dosage was 500 mg/m(2). Dose-limiting toxicity was determined after one cycle. Patients were initially enrolled according to a rolling-6 design; subsequent dose re-escalation phase was based on a 3 + 3 design. RESULTS: We treated patients at 400 (n = 6), 500 (n = 15), and 650 (n = 5) mg/m(2), with de-escalation due to toxicity. Twenty-three of twenty-six patients enrolled were evaluable. Five patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia (n = 2: 650 mg/m(2); n = 3: 500 mg/m(2)). One patient experienced grade 3 diarrhea. At 500 mg/m(2), the median 5-FU maximal concentration, AUC0-∞, and alpha half-life were 825 µM, 205 µM × h, and 9.9 min, respectively. Interim analysis revealed an association between hematologic toxicity and prior number of chemotherapeutic regimens (P = .03). The study was amended to re-escalate the dosage in a less heavily pretreated cohort of patients. CONCLUSIONS: These phase I clinical data provide initial pharmacokinetic parameters to describe i.v. bolus 5-FU disposition in children with recurrent ependymoma. Tumor exposures effective in preclinical testing can be achieved with tolerable bolus dosages in patients. Bolus 5-FU is well tolerated and possesses antitumor activity.
Authors: J Y Douillard; D Cunningham; A D Roth; M Navarro; R D James; P Karasek; P Jandik; T Iveson; J Carmichael; M Alakl; G Gruia; L Awad; P Rougier Journal: Lancet Date: 2000-03-25 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: K Matsumoto; K Tabuchi; T Furuta; T Fujiwara; S Nakasone; R Ohnishi; Y Moriya; A Nishimoto; A Doi; S Asari Journal: Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) Date: 1983-08 Impact factor: 1.742
Authors: A Di Paolo; R Danesi; A Falcone; L Cionini; F Vannozzi; G Masi; G Allegrini; E Mini; G Bocci; P F Conte; M Del Tacca Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Thomas E Merchant; Raymond K Mulhern; Matthew J Krasin; Larry E Kun; Tani Williams; Chenghong Li; Xiaoping Xiong; Raja B Khan; Robert H Lustig; Frederick A Boop; Robert A Sanford Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-08-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Matthew Parker; Kumarasamypet M Mohankumar; Chandanamali Punchihewa; Ricardo Weinlich; James D Dalton; Yongjin Li; Ryan Lee; Ruth G Tatevossian; Timothy N Phoenix; Radhika Thiruvenkatam; Elsie White; Bo Tang; Wilda Orisme; Kirti Gupta; Michael Rusch; Xiang Chen; Yuxin Li; Panduka Nagahawhatte; Erin Hedlund; David Finkelstein; Gang Wu; Sheila Shurtleff; John Easton; Kristy Boggs; Donald Yergeau; Bhavin Vadodaria; Heather L Mulder; Jared Becksfort; Jared Becksford; Pankaj Gupta; Robert Huether; Jing Ma; Guangchun Song; Amar Gajjar; Thomas Merchant; Frederick Boop; Amy A Smith; Li Ding; Charles Lu; Kerri Ochoa; David Zhao; Robert S Fulton; Lucinda L Fulton; Elaine R Mardis; Richard K Wilson; James R Downing; Douglas R Green; Jinghui Zhang; David W Ellison; Richard J Gilbertson Journal: Nature Date: 2014-02-19 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Andrew M Donson; Vladimir Amani; Elliot A Warner; Andrea M Griesinger; Davis A Witt; Jean M Mulcahy Levy; Lindsey M Hoffman; Todd C Hankinson; Michael H Handler; Rajeev Vibhakar; Kathleen Dorris; Nicholas K Foreman Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2018-06-20 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: P D Delgado-López; E M Corrales-García; E Alonso-García; R García-Leal; R González-Rodrigálvarez; E Araus-Galdós; J Martín-Alonso Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2019-03-13 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Ursula Amstutz; Linda M Henricks; Steven M Offer; Julia Barbarino; Jan H M Schellens; Jesse J Swen; Teri E Klein; Howard L McLeod; Kelly E Caudle; Robert B Diasio; Matthias Schwab Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2017-11-20 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: V M Daryani; Y T Patel; M Tagen; D C Turner; A M Carcaboso; J M Atkinson; A Gajjar; R J Gilbertson; K D Wright; C F Stewart Journal: CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol Date: 2016-04-14
Authors: Kristian W Pajtler; Stephen C Mack; Vijay Ramaswamy; Christian A Smith; Hendrik Witt; Amy Smith; Jordan R Hansford; Katja von Hoff; Karen D Wright; Eugene Hwang; Didier Frappaz; Yonehiro Kanemura; Maura Massimino; Cécile Faure-Conter; Piergiorgio Modena; Uri Tabori; Katherine E Warren; Eric C Holland; Koichi Ichimura; Felice Giangaspero; David Castel; Andreas von Deimling; Marcel Kool; Peter B Dirks; Richard G Grundy; Nicholas K Foreman; Amar Gajjar; Andrey Korshunov; Jonathan Finlay; Richard J Gilbertson; David W Ellison; Kenneth D Aldape; Thomas E Merchant; Eric Bouffet; Stefan M Pfister; Michael D Taylor Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Sharon Christensen; Bastiaan Van der Roest; Nicolle Besselink; Roel Janssen; Sander Boymans; John W M Martens; Marie-Laure Yaspo; Peter Priestley; Ewart Kuijk; Edwin Cuppen; Arne Van Hoeck Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2019-10-08 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Noreen Eder; Federico Roncaroli; Marie-Charlotte Domart; Stuart Horswell; Felipe Andreiuolo; Helen R Flynn; Andre T Lopes; Suzanne Claxton; John-Paul Kilday; Lucy Collinson; Jun-Hao Mao; Torsten Pietsch; Barry Thompson; Ambrosius P Snijders; Sila K Ultanir Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-05-13 Impact factor: 14.919