Literature DB >> 26538652

Human Auditory Cortex Neurochemistry Reflects the Presence and Severity of Tinnitus.

William Sedley1, Jehill Parikh2, Richard A E Edden3, Valerie Tait4, Andrew Blamire2, Timothy D Griffiths5.   

Abstract

It is not known why tinnitus occurs in some cases of hearing damage but not others. Abnormalities of excitation-inhibition balance could influence whether tinnitus develops and its severity if it does. Animal models of hearing damage, which also produce tinnitus based on behavioral evidence, have identified abnormalities of GABAergic inhibition, both cortically and subcortically. However, the precise relationships of GABA inhibitory changes to tinnitus itself, as opposed to other consequences of hearing damage, remain uncertain. Here, we used magnetic resonance spectroscopy to non-invasively quantify GABA in the left (LAC) and right (RAC) auditory cortices of a group of 14 patients with lateralized tinnitus (eight left ear) and 14 controls matched for age, sex, and hearing. We also explored the potential relationships with other brain metabolites (i.e., choline, N-acetylaspartate, and creatine). The presence of tinnitus was associated with a reduction in auditory cortex GABA concentration. Regardless of tinnitus laterality, post hoc testing indicated reductions that were significant in RAC and nonsignificant in LAC. Tinnitus severity and hearing loss were correlated positively with RAC choline but not GABA. We discuss the results in the context of current models of tinnitus and methodological constraints. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Permanently affecting one in seven adults, tinnitus lacks both widely effective treatments and adequate understanding of its brain mechanisms. Existing animal models represent tinnitus that may not be distinguishable from homeostatic responses to the auditory insults used to induce it. Human studies can be well controlled in this regard but are usually not (with few even matching control subjects for hearing loss) and are limited in scope as a result of relying solely on non-invasive recording techniques. Here, we exploit recent advances in non-invasive spectroscopic techniques to establish, in a human study tightly controlled for hearing loss and hyperacusis, that tinnitus is associated with a significant reduction in auditory cortex GABA concentration, which has implications for understanding and treatment of the condition.
Copyright © 2015 Sedley et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GABA; MR spectroscopy; auditory cortex; choline; tinnitus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26538652      PMCID: PMC4635131          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2695-15.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  52 in total

1.  Java-based graphical user interface for MRUI, a software package for quantitation of in vivo/medical magnetic resonance spectroscopy signals.

Authors:  A Naressi; C Couturier; I Castang; R de Beer; D Graveron-Demilly
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.589

2.  Changes in spontaneous firing rate and neural synchrony in cat primary auditory cortex after localized tone-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Satoshi Seki; Jos J Eggermont
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Tissue correction for GABA-edited MRS: Considerations of voxel composition, tissue segmentation, and tissue relaxations.

Authors:  Ashley D Harris; Nicolaas A J Puts; Richard A E Edden
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  CDP-choline treatment induces brain plasticity markers expression in experimental animal stroke.

Authors:  María Gutiérrez-Fernández; Berta Rodríguez-Frutos; Blanca Fuentes; María Teresa Vallejo-Cremades; Julia Alvarez-Grech; Mercedes Expósito-Alcaide; Exuperio Díez-Tejedor
Journal:  Neurochem Int       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 3.921

5.  Diminished cortical inhibition in an aging mouse model of chronic tinnitus.

Authors:  Daniel A Llano; Jeremy Turner; Donald M Caspary
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Psychometric normalization of a hyperacusis questionnaire.

Authors:  S Khalfa; S Dubal; E Veuillet; F Perez-Diaz; R Jouvent; L Collet
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.538

Review 7.  Tinnitus-related neural activity: theories of generation, propagation, and centralization.

Authors:  Arnaud J Noreña; Brandon J Farley
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Neuromagnetic indicators of tinnitus and tinnitus masking in patients with and without hearing loss.

Authors:  Peyman Adjamian; Magdalena Sereda; Oliver Zobay; Deborah A Hall; Alan R Palmer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-07-12

9.  Intracranial Mapping of a Cortical Tinnitus System using Residual Inhibition.

Authors:  William Sedley; Phillip E Gander; Sukhbinder Kumar; Hiroyuki Oya; Christopher K Kovach; Kirill V Nourski; Hiroto Kawasaki; Matthew A Howard; Timothy D Griffiths
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 10.  Do cortical gamma oscillations promote or suppress perception? An under-asked question with an over-assumed answer.

Authors:  William Sedley; Mark O Cunningham
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Auditory thalamic circuits and GABAA receptor function: Putative mechanisms in tinnitus pathology.

Authors:  Donald M Caspary; Daniel A Llano
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-21       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  High Fat Diet Increases [3H] Flunitrazepam Binding in the Mouse Brain that is Dependent on the Expression of the Dopamine D2 Gene.

Authors:  Josh Neuman; Nicole Roeder; Brittany Richardson; Teresa Quattrin; John Hamilton; Panayotis K Thanos
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.414

3.  Neuroglial activation in the auditory cortex and medial geniculate body of salicylate-induced tinnitus rats.

Authors:  Chenchen Xia; Manli Yin; Cong Wu; Yonghua Ji; You Zhou
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 4.  Effects of Non-traumatic Noise and Conductive Hearing Loss on Auditory System Function.

Authors:  Amanda M Lauer; Micheal L Dent; Wei Sun; Matthew A Xu-Friedman
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Audiometric Predictors of Bothersome Tinnitus in a Large Clinical Cohort of Adults With Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Rebecca M Lewis; Kelly N Jahn; Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; William B Goedicke; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.619

Review 6.  An Integrative Tinnitus Model Based on Sensory Precision.

Authors:  William Sedley; Karl J Friston; Phillip E Gander; Sukhbinder Kumar; Timothy D Griffiths
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 13.837

7.  Pairing sound with vagus nerve stimulation modulates cortical synchrony and phase coherence in tinnitus: An exploratory retrospective study.

Authors:  Sven Vanneste; Jeffrey Martin; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Hyperexcitability of inferior colliculus and acoustic startle reflex with age-related hearing loss.

Authors:  Binbin Xiong; Ana'am Alkharabsheh; Senthilvelan Manohar; Guang-Di Chen; Ning Yu; Xiaoming Zhao; Richard Salvi; Wei Sun
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.672

9.  Investigating functional changes in the brain to intermittently induced auditory illusions and its relevance to chronic tinnitus.

Authors:  Anusha Mohan; Neil Bhamoo; Juan S Riquelme; Samantha Long; Arnaud Norena; Sven Vanneste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  BOLD fMRI effects of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in patients with chronic tinnitus.

Authors:  Natalia Yakunina; Sam Soo Kim; Eui-Cheol Nam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.