BACKGROUND: In a phase II study, we showed that temozolomide (TMZ) was tolerable and active in heavily pre-treated patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) and MGMT methylation. A schedule of dose-dense TMZ may have enhanced activity due to the higher cumulative dose and induction of MGMT depletion, even in resistant tumors. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with chemorefractory MGMT-methylated CRC were treated with TMZ at a daily dose of 75 mg/m(2) for 21 consecutive days every 4 weeks, for up to six cycles or until the occurrence of progressive disease/unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was treatment activity in terms of objective response rate (ORR). MGMT protein expression was tested by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on two pooled cohorts: patients from the previous study of standard-dose TMZ and those from the current investigation. RESULTS: From November 2013 to December 2014, 32 patients were treated at Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori. We observed only three episodes of grade 3 asthenia and no significant myelotoxicity. The ORR was 16 % (all partial responses occurring in RAS-BRAF-mutated tumors). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 2.3 and 6.7 months, respectively. Patients with MGMT-low expression by IHC had a significantly higher ORR (p < 0.0001) and PFS (p = 0.001) compared to those with MGMT-high expression, while no difference was observed in OS. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm the encouraging activity of TMZ in chemorefractory CRC patients selected for MGMT silencing, even in the RAS-BRAF-mutated population. The role of MGMT IHC as a biomarker for improving patient selection warrants further prospective confirmation.
BACKGROUND: In a phase II study, we showed that temozolomide (TMZ) was tolerable and active in heavily pre-treated patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) and MGMT methylation. A schedule of dose-dense TMZ may have enhanced activity due to the higher cumulative dose and induction of MGMT depletion, even in resistant tumors. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with chemorefractory MGMT-methylated CRC were treated with TMZ at a daily dose of 75 mg/m(2) for 21 consecutive days every 4 weeks, for up to six cycles or until the occurrence of progressive disease/unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was treatment activity in terms of objective response rate (ORR). MGMT protein expression was tested by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on two pooled cohorts: patients from the previous study of standard-dose TMZ and those from the current investigation. RESULTS: From November 2013 to December 2014, 32 patients were treated at Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori. We observed only three episodes of grade 3 asthenia and no significant myelotoxicity. The ORR was 16 % (all partial responses occurring in RAS-BRAF-mutated tumors). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 2.3 and 6.7 months, respectively. Patients with MGMT-low expression by IHC had a significantly higher ORR (p < 0.0001) and PFS (p = 0.001) compared to those with MGMT-high expression, while no difference was observed in OS. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm the encouraging activity of TMZ in chemorefractory CRC patients selected for MGMT silencing, even in the RAS-BRAF-mutated population. The role of MGMT IHC as a biomarker for improving patient selection warrants further prospective confirmation.
Authors: M Esteller; R A Risques; M Toyota; G Capella; V Moreno; M A Peinado; S B Baylin; J G Herman Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2001-06-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Marta Brell; Avelina Tortosa; Eugenia Verger; Juan Miguel Gil; Nuria Viñolas; Salvador Villá; Juan José Acebes; Lluis Caral; Teresa Pujol; Isidro Ferrer; Teresa Ribalta; Francesc Graus Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-07-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: A Tosoni; E Franceschi; M Ermani; R Bertorelle; L Bonaldi; V Blatt; Alba A Brandes Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2008-04-23 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: F Pietrantonio; F Perrone; F de Braud; A Castano; C Maggi; I Bossi; A Gevorgyan; P Biondani; M Pacifici; A Busico; M Gariboldi; F Festinese; E Tamborini; M Di Bartolomeo Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2013-12-29 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: A W Tolcher; S L Gerson; L Denis; C Geyer; L A Hammond; A Patnaik; A D Goetz; G Schwartz; T Edwards; L Reyderman; P Statkevich; D L Cutler; E K Rowinsky Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2003-04-07 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Christopher B Jackson; Seth I Noorbakhsh; Ranjini K Sundaram; Aravind N Kalathil; Sachita Ganesa; Lanqi Jia; Hank Breslin; Danielle M Burgenske; Oren Gilad; Jann N Sarkaria; Ranjit S Bindra Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2019-07-04 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Monica Niger; Federico Nichetti; Andrea Casadei-Gardini; Federica Morano; Chiara Pircher; Elena Tamborini; Federica Perrone; Matteo Canale; Daniel B Lipka; Andrea Vingiani; Luca Agnelli; Anna Dobberkau; Jennifer Hüllein; Felix Korell; Christoph E Heilig; Sara Pusceddu; Francesca Corti; Michele Droz; Paola Ulivi; Michele Prisciandaro; Maria Antista; Marta Bini; Laura Cattaneo; Massimo Milione; Hanno Glimm; Bruno C Köhler; Giancarlo Pruneri; Daniel Hübschmann; Stefan Fröhling; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Filippo Pietrantonio; Maria Di Bartolomeo; Filippo de Braud Journal: Mol Oncol Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 7.449
Authors: M A Calegari; A Inno; S Monterisi; A Orlandi; D Santini; M Basso; A Cassano; M Martini; T Cenci; I de Pascalis; F Camarda; B Barbaro; L M Larocca; S Gori; G Tonini; C Barone Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2017-04-20 Impact factor: 7.640