Literature DB >> 26538069

Clinical Sensitivity of Cystic Fibrosis Mutation Panels in a Diverse Population.

Erin E Hughes1, Colleen F Stevens1, Carlos A Saavedra-Matiz1, Norma P Tavakoli1,2, Lea M Krein1, April Parker1, Zhen Zhang3, Breanne Maloney1, Beth Vogel1, Joan DeCelie-Germana4, Catherine Kier5, Ran D Anbar6, Maria N Berdella7, Paul G Comber8, Allen J Dozor9, Danielle M Goetz10, Louis Guida11, Meyer Kattan12, Andrew Ting13, Karen Z Voter14, Patrick van Roey1,3, Michele Caggana1, Denise M Kay1.   

Abstract

Infants are screened for cystic fibrosis (CF) in New York State (NYS) using an IRT-DNA algorithm. The purpose of this study was to validate and assess clinical validity of the US FDA-cleared Illumina MiSeqDx CF 139-Variant Assay (139-VA) in the diverse NYS CF population. The study included 439 infants with CF identified via newborn screening (NBS) from 2002 to 2012. All had been screened using the Abbott Molecular CF Genotyping Assay or the Hologic InPlex CF Molecular Test. All with CF and zero or one mutation were tested using the 139-VA. DNA extracted from dried blood spots was reliably and accurately genotyped using the 139-VA. Sixty-three additional mutations were identified. Clinical sensitivity of three panels ranged from 76.2% (23 mutations recommended for screening by ACMG/ACOG) to 79.7% (current NYS 39-mutation InPlex panel), up to 86.0% for the 139-VA. For all, sensitivity was highest in Whites and lowest in the Black population. Although the sample size was small, there was a nearly 20% increase in sensitivity for the Black CF population using the 139-VA (68.2%) over the ACMG/ACOG and InPlex panels (both 50.0%). Overall, the 139-VA is more sensitive than other commercially available panels, and could be considered for NBS, clinical, or research laboratories conducting CF screening.
© 2015 WILEY PERIODICALS, INC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CFTR; NGS; clinical sensitivity; cystic fibrosis; mutation panel; newborn screening; next-generation sequencing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26538069     DOI: 10.1002/humu.22927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mutat        ISSN: 1059-7794            Impact factor:   4.878


  10 in total

1.  Review of applications of high-throughput sequencing in personalized medicine: barriers and facilitators of future progress in research and clinical application.

Authors:  Gaye Lightbody; Valeriia Haberland; Fiona Browne; Laura Taggart; Huiru Zheng; Eileen Parkes; Jaine K Blayney
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 11.622

2.  A Novel Pathogenic Variant of the CFTR Gene in a Patient with Cystic Fibrosis Phenotype-c.4096A > T.

Authors:  Ahmet Burak Arslan; Ayşe Gül Zamani; Sevgi Pekcan; Mahmut Selman Yıldırım
Journal:  J Pediatr Genet       Date:  2019-08-28

Review 3.  Innovative and rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems.

Authors:  Alex van Belkum; Carey-Ann D Burnham; John W A Rossen; Frederic Mallard; Olivier Rochas; William Michael Dunne
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 60.633

4.  Prenatal Ultrasound Suspicion of Cystic Fibrosis in a Multiethnic Population: Is Extensive CFTR Genotyping Needed?

Authors:  Chadia Mekki; Abdel Aissat; Véronique Mirlesse; Sophie Mayer Lacrosniere; Elsa Eche; Annick Le Floch; Sandra Whalen; Cecile Prud'Homme; Christelle Remus; Benoit Funalot; Vanina Castaigne; Pascale Fanen; Alix de Becdelièvre
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 4.096

5.  Newborn Screening Quality Assurance Program for CFTR Mutation Detection and Gene Sequencing to Identify Cystic Fibrosis.

Authors:  Miyono M Hendrix; Stephanie L Foster; Suzanne K Cordovado
Journal:  J Inborn Errors Metab Screen       Date:  2016-08-01

Review 6.  The Impact of the CFTR Gene Discovery on Cystic Fibrosis Diagnosis, Counseling, and Preventive Therapy.

Authors:  Philip M Farrell; Michael J Rock; Mei W Baker
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 4.096

7.  Evaluating sequence data quality from the Swift Accel-Amplicon CFTR Panel.

Authors:  Marco L Leung; Deborah J Watson; Courtney N Vaccaro; Fernanda Mafra; Adam Wenocur; Tiancheng Wang; Hakon Hakonarson; Avni Santani
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 6.444

8.  Prevalence of Rare Genetic Variations and Their Implications in NGS-data Interpretation.

Authors:  Yangrae Cho; Chul-Ho Lee; Eun-Goo Jeong; Min-Ho Kim; Jong Hui Hong; Younhee Ko; Bomnun Lee; Gilly Yun; Byong Joon Kim; Jongcheol Jung; Jongsun Jung; Jin-Sung Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  The influence of social determinants of health on the genetic diagnostic odyssey: who remains undiagnosed, why, and to what effect?

Authors:  Yarden S Fraiman; Monica H Wojcik
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 3.756

10.  Phenotypic Presentations of Cystic Fibrosis in Children of African Descent.

Authors:  Sophie Mayer Lacrosniere; Michele Gerardin; Laurence Le Clainche-Viala; Veronique Houdouin
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 4.096

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.