Literature DB >> 26536871

SOLTI NeoPARP: a phase II randomized study of two schedules of iniparib plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel alone as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Antonio Llombart-Cussac1,2, Begoña Bermejo3,4, Cristian Villanueva3,5, Suzette Delaloge6, Serafín Morales3,7, Judith Balmaña3,8, Kepa Amillano3,9, Hervé Bonnefoi10, Ana Casas3,11, Luis Manso3,12, Henri Roché13, Santiago Gonzalez-Santiago3,14, Joaquín Gavilá3,15, Pedro Sánchez-Rovira16, Serena Di Cosimo3,17, Nadia Harbeck18, Eric Charpentier19, Ignacio Garcia-Ribas19, Nina Radosevic-Robin20,21, Claudia Aura8, Jose Baselga3,22.   

Abstract

Iniparib is an investigational agent with antitumor activity of controversial mechanism of action. Two previous trials in advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in combination with gemcitabine and carboplatin showed some evidence of efficacy that was not confirmed. This phase II randomized neoadjuvant study was designed to explore its activity and tolerability with weekly paclitaxel (PTX) as neoadjuvant treatment in TNBC patients. 141 patients with Stage II-IIIA TNBC were randomly assigned to receive PTX (80 mg/m(2), d1; n = 47) alone or in combination with iniparib, either once-weekly (PWI) (11.2 mg/kg, d1; n = 46) or twice-weekly (PTI) (5.6 mg/kg, d1, 4; n = 48) for 12 weeks. Primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR) in the breast. pCR rate was similar among the three arms (21, 22, and 19 % for PTX, PWI, and PTI, respectively). Secondary efficacy endpoints were comparable: pCR in breast and axilla (21, 17, and 19 %); best overall response in the breast (60, 61, and 63 %); and breast conservation rate (53, 54, and 50 %). Slightly more patients in the PTI arm presented grade 3/4 neutropenia (4, 0, and 10 %). Grade 1/2 (28, 22, and 29 %), but no grade 3/4 neuropathy, was observed. There were no differences in serious adverse events and treatment-emergent adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation among the three arms. Addition of iniparib to weekly PTX did not add relevant antitumor activity or toxicity. These results do not support further evaluation of the combination of iniparib at these doses plus paclitaxel in early TNBC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Iniparib; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Paclitaxel; Triple-negative breast cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26536871      PMCID: PMC4971774          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-015-3616-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  11 in total

1.  Failure of iniparib to inhibit poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase in vitro.

Authors:  Anand G Patel; Silvana B De Lorenzo; Karen S Flatten; Guy G Poirier; Scott H Kaufmann
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Exploring molecular pathways of triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Valeria Ossovskaya; Yipeng Wang; Adam Budoff; Qiang Xu; Alexander Lituev; Olga Potapova; Gordon Vansant; Joseph Monforte; Nikolai Daraselia
Journal:  Genes Cancer       Date:  2011-09

3.  Weekly paclitaxel improves pathologic complete remission in operable breast cancer when compared with paclitaxel once every 3 weeks.

Authors:  Marjorie C Green; Aman U Buzdar; Terry Smith; Nuhad K Ibrahim; Vicente Valero; Marguerite F Rosales; Massimo Cristofanilli; Daniel J Booser; Lajos Pusztai; Edgardo Rivera; Richard L Theriault; Cynthia Carter; Debra Frye; Kelly K Hunt; W Fraser Symmans; Eric A Strom; Aysegul A Sahin; William Sikov; Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Iniparib plus chemotherapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Joyce O'Shaughnessy; Cynthia Osborne; John E Pippen; Mark Yoffe; Debra Patt; Christine Rocha; Ingrid Chou Koo; Barry M Sherman; Charles Bradley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Phase III study of iniparib plus gemcitabine and carboplatin versus gemcitabine and carboplatin in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Joyce O'Shaughnessy; Lee Schwartzberg; Michael A Danso; Kathy D Miller; Hope S Rugo; Marcus Neubauer; Nicholas Robert; Beth Hellerstedt; Mansoor Saleh; Paul Richards; Jennifer M Specht; Denise A Yardley; Robert W Carlson; Richard S Finn; Eric Charpentier; Ignacio Garcia-Ribas; Eric P Winer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Iniparib nonselectively modifies cysteine-containing proteins in tumor cells and is not a bona fide PARP inhibitor.

Authors:  Xuesong Liu; Yan Shi; David X Maag; Joann P Palma; Melanie J Patterson; Paul A Ellis; Bruce W Surber; Damien B Ready; Niru B Soni; Uri S Ladror; Allison J Xu; Ramesh Iyer; John E Harlan; Larry R Solomon; Cherrie K Donawho; Thomas D Penning; Eric F Johnson; Alexander R Shoemaker
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Nonhomologous end joining drives poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor lethality in homologous recombination-deficient cells.

Authors:  Anand G Patel; Jann N Sarkaria; Scott H Kaufmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis.

Authors:  Patricia Cortazar; Lijun Zhang; Michael Untch; Keyur Mehta; Joseph P Costantino; Norman Wolmark; Hervé Bonnefoi; David Cameron; Luca Gianni; Pinuccia Valagussa; Sandra M Swain; Tatiana Prowell; Sibylle Loibl; D Lawrence Wickerham; Jan Bogaerts; Jose Baselga; Charles Perou; Gideon Blumenthal; Jens Blohmer; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Jonas Bergh; Vladimir Semiglazov; Robert Justice; Holger Eidtmann; Soonmyung Paik; Martine Piccart; Rajeshwari Sridhara; Peter A Fasching; Leen Slaets; Shenghui Tang; Bernd Gerber; Charles E Geyer; Richard Pazdur; Nina Ditsch; Priya Rastogi; Wolfgang Eiermann; Gunter von Minckwitz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Phase III trial evaluating weekly paclitaxel versus docetaxel in combination with capecitabine in operable breast cancer.

Authors:  Catherine M Kelly; Marjorie C Green; Kristine Broglio; Eva S Thomas; Abenaa M Brewster; Vicente Valero; Nuhad K Ibrahim; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Daniel J Booser; Ronald S Walters; Kelly K Hunt; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Aman U Buzdar
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  A randomized, phase II, three-arm study of two schedules of ixabepilone or paclitaxel plus bevacizumab as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Hope S Rugo; Mario Campone; Dino Amadori; Daniela Aldrighetti; Pierfranco Conte; Andrew Wardley; Cristian Villanueva; Michelle Melisko; M Brent McHenry; David Liu; Francis Lee; Xavier Pivot
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Breast cancer liver metastasis: current and future treatment approaches.

Authors:  Narmeen S Rashid; Jacqueline M Grible; Charles V Clevenger; J Chuck Harrell
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 5.150

2.  Incidence of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia in patients receiving poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors for the treatment of solid tumors: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Roni Nitecki; Alexander Melamed; Allison A Gockley; Jessica Floyd; Kate J Krause; Robert L Coleman; Ursula A Matulonis; Sharon H Giordano; Karen H Lu; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 5.304

3.  Cisplatin versus carboplatin in combination with paclitaxel as neoadjuvant regimen for triple negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Liang Huang; Qi Liu; Sheng Chen; Zhiming Shao
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Glycophenotype of breast and prostate cancer stem cells treated with thieno[2,3-b]pyridine anticancer compound.

Authors:  Angela Mastelić; Vedrana Čikeš Čulić; Nikolina Režić Mužinić; Milena Vuica-Ross; David Barker; Euphemia Y Leung; Jóhannes Reynisson; Anita Markotić
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 4.162

5.  Effect of antitumor treatments on triple-negative breast cancer patients: A PRISMA-compliant network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Qiuhong Tian; Peng Du; Sen Li; Zhenzhu Bai; Yong Yang; Jinsheng Zeng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  A Bayesian network meta-analysis of the efficacy of targeted therapies and chemotherapy for treatment of triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Huihui Chen; Wei Lu; Yixin Zhang; Xuan Zhu; Jiaojiao Zhou; Yiding Chen
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 7.  Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens for triple-negative breast cancer: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yunhai Li; Dejuan Yang; Ping Chen; Xuedong Yin; Jiazheng Sun; Hongzhong Li; Guosheng Ren
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 5.682

Review 8.  Optimal Management for Residual Disease Following Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy.

Authors:  Julia Foldi; Mariya Rozenblit; Tristen S Park; Christin A Knowlton; Mehra Golshan; Meena Moran; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2021-07-02

9.  Neoadjuvant therapy in operable breast cancer: application to triple negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Foluso O Ademuyiwa; Matthew J Ellis; Cynthia X Ma
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 4.375

10.  Progress in targeted therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Jie Ju; An-Jie Zhu; Peng Yuan
Journal:  Chronic Dis Transl Med       Date:  2018-07-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.