PURPOSE: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are undergoing extensive clinical testing for their single-agent activity in homologous recombination (HR)-deficient tumors and ability to enhance the action of certain DNA-damaging agents. Compared with other PARP inhibitors in development, iniparib (4-iodo-3-nitrobenzamide) is notable for its simple structure and the reported ability of its intracellular metabolite 4-iodo-3-nitrosobenzamide to covalently inhibit PARP1 under cell-free conditions. The present preclinical studies were conducted to compare the actions iniparib with the more extensively characterized PARP inhibitors olaparib and veliparib. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The abilities of iniparib, olaparib, and veliparib to (i) selectively induce apoptosis or inhibit colony formation in HR-deficient cell lines, (ii) selectively sensitize HR-proficient cells to topoisomerase I poisons, and (iii) inhibit formation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymer (pADPr) in intact cells were compared. RESULTS: Consistent with earlier reports, olaparib and veliparib selectively induced apoptosis and inhibited colony formation in cells lacking BRCA2 or ATM. Moreover, like earlier generation PARP inhibitors, olaparib and veliparib sensitized cells to the topoisomerase I poisons camptothecin and topotecan. Finally, olaparib and veliparib inhibited formation of pADPr in intact cells. In contrast, iniparib exhibited little or no ability to selectively kill HR-deficient cells, sensitize cells to topoisomerase I poisons, or inhibit pADPr formation in situ. In further experiments, iniparib also failed to sensitize cells to cisplatin, gemcitabine, or paclitaxel. CONCLUSIONS: While iniparib kills normal and neoplastic cells at high (>40 μmol/L) concentrations, its effects are unlikely to reflect PARP inhibition and should not be used to guide decisions about other PARP inhibitors.
PURPOSE:Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are undergoing extensive clinical testing for their single-agent activity in homologous recombination (HR)-deficient tumors and ability to enhance the action of certain DNA-damaging agents. Compared with other PARP inhibitors in development, iniparib (4-iodo-3-nitrobenzamide) is notable for its simple structure and the reported ability of its intracellular metabolite 4-iodo-3-nitrosobenzamide to covalently inhibit PARP1 under cell-free conditions. The present preclinical studies were conducted to compare the actions iniparib with the more extensively characterized PARP inhibitors olaparib and veliparib. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The abilities of iniparib, olaparib, and veliparib to (i) selectively induce apoptosis or inhibit colony formation in HR-deficient cell lines, (ii) selectively sensitize HR-proficient cells to topoisomerase I poisons, and (iii) inhibit formation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymer (pADPr) in intact cells were compared. RESULTS: Consistent with earlier reports, olaparib and veliparib selectively induced apoptosis and inhibited colony formation in cells lacking BRCA2 or ATM. Moreover, like earlier generation PARP inhibitors, olaparib and veliparib sensitized cells to the topoisomerase I poisonscamptothecin and topotecan. Finally, olaparib and veliparib inhibited formation of pADPr in intact cells. In contrast, iniparib exhibited little or no ability to selectively kill HR-deficient cells, sensitize cells to topoisomerase I poisons, or inhibit pADPr formation in situ. In further experiments, iniparib also failed to sensitize cells to cisplatin, gemcitabine, or paclitaxel. CONCLUSIONS: While iniparib kills normal and neoplastic cells at high (>40 μmol/L) concentrations, its effects are unlikely to reflect PARP inhibition and should not be used to guide decisions about other PARP inhibitors.
Authors: Anand G Patel; Karen S Flatten; Paula A Schneider; Nga T Dai; Jennifer S McDonald; Guy G Poirier; Scott H Kaufmann Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2011-12-12 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: S P Langdon; S S Lawrie; F G Hay; M M Hawkes; A McDonald; I P Hayward; D J Schol; J Hilgers; R C Leonard; J F Smyth Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1988-11-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: W G Rice; C D Hillyer; B Harten; C A Schaeffer; M Dorminy; D A Lackey; E Kirsten; J Mendeleyev; K G Buki; A Hakam Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1992-08-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Christopher R Calabrese; Robert Almassy; Stephanie Barton; Michael A Batey; A Hilary Calvert; Stacie Canan-Koch; Barbara W Durkacz; Zdenek Hostomsky; Robert A Kumpf; Suzanne Kyle; Jianke Li; Karen Maegley; David R Newell; Elena Notarianni; Ian J Stratford; Donald Skalitzky; Huw D Thomas; Lan-Zhen Wang; Stephen E Webber; Kaye J Williams; Nicola J Curtin Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2004-01-07 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Joaquin Mateo; Michael Ong; David S P Tan; Michael A Gonzalez; Johann S de Bono Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2013-10-15 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Véronique Diéras; Hervé Bonnefoi; Emilio Alba; Ahmad Awada; Bruno Coudert; Xavier Pivot; Joseph Gligorov; Agnes Jager; Stefania Zambelli; Geoffrey J Lindeman; Eric Charpentier; Gary T Emmons; Ignacio Garcia-Ribas; Robert Paridaens; Jaap Verweij Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Melinda L Telli; Kristin C Jensen; Shaveta Vinayak; Allison W Kurian; Jafi A Lipson; Patrick J Flaherty; Kirsten Timms; Victor Abkevich; Elizabeth A Schackmann; Irene L Wapnir; Robert W Carlson; Pei-Jen Chang; Joseph A Sparano; Bobbie Head; Lori J Goldstein; Barbara Haley; Shaker R Dakhil; Julia E Reid; Anne-Renee Hartman; Judith Manola; James M Ford Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-04-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jaishri O Blakeley; Stuart A Grossman; Tom Mikkelsen; Myrna R Rosenfeld; David Peereboom; L Burt Nabors; Andrew S Chi; Gary Emmons; Ignacio Garcia Ribas; Jeffrey G Supko; Serena Desideri; Xiaobu Ye Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 4.130