Olivier Thaunat1, Lionel Badet, Valérie Dubois, Jean Kanitakis, Palmina Petruzzo, Emmanuel Morelon. 1. aHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Service de Transplantation, Néphrologie et Immunologie Clinique bUniversité de Lyon cINSERM, U1111 dHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Service d'Urologie et Transplantation eEtablissement Français du Sang fHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Service de Dermatologie, Lyon, France.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: As both the number of vascularized composite allotransplants (VCAs) recipients and the duration of their follow-up are limited, immunopathology of VCA rejection remains incompletely understood. VCAs have several immunological peculiarities, which make inaccurate a direct extrapolation of all rules established for solid organs. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite their bone marrow content, VCA do not induce chimerism in recipient and are therefore not spontaneously tolerated. Skin compartment of VCA contains a high density of antigen-presenting cells (APCs), some with self-renewal capacity. Donor APCs are responsible for continuous direct allosensitization of recipient's T cells that explains the high incidence of skin T-cell-mediated rejection and their occurrence beyond 1 year.Regenerative capability of the skin prevents the development of chronic rejection of this compartment as long as immunosuppression is maintained. In contrast, VCA can develop graft arteriosclerosis, which could be because of T cell and/or chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). VCA recipients can indeed develop donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Whether DSA can also trigger acute AMR of VCA remains to be clarified. SUMMARY: A better understanding of the specificities of the immunopathology of VCA rejection should pave the way for the rationalization of immunosuppressive strategies aiming at optimizing long-term outcome.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: As both the number of vascularized composite allotransplants (VCAs) recipients and the duration of their follow-up are limited, immunopathology of VCA rejection remains incompletely understood. VCAs have several immunological peculiarities, which make inaccurate a direct extrapolation of all rules established for solid organs. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite their bone marrow content, VCA do not induce chimerism in recipient and are therefore not spontaneously tolerated. Skin compartment of VCA contains a high density of antigen-presenting cells (APCs), some with self-renewal capacity. Donor APCs are responsible for continuous direct allosensitization of recipient's T cells that explains the high incidence of skin T-cell-mediated rejection and their occurrence beyond 1 year.Regenerative capability of the skin prevents the development of chronic rejection of this compartment as long as immunosuppression is maintained. In contrast, VCA can develop graft arteriosclerosis, which could be because of T cell and/or chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). VCA recipients can indeed develop donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Whether DSA can also trigger acute AMR of VCA remains to be clarified. SUMMARY: A better understanding of the specificities of the immunopathology of VCA rejection should pave the way for the rationalization of immunosuppressive strategies aiming at optimizing long-term outcome.
Authors: Jeffrey L Platt; Christina L Kaufman; Mayara Garcia de Mattos Barbosa; Marilia Cascalho Journal: Curr Opin Organ Transplant Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 2.640
Authors: Laura C Burlage; Shannon N Tessier; Joanna W Etra; Korkut Uygun; Gerald Brandacher Journal: Curr Opin Organ Transplant Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 2.640
Authors: Thet Su Win; William J Crisler; Beatrice Dyring-Andersen; Rachel Lopdrup; Jessica E Teague; Qian Zhan; Victor Barrera; Shannan Ho Sui; Sotirios Tasigiorgos; Naoka Murakami; Anil Chandraker; Stefan G Tullius; Bohdan Pomahac; Leonardo V Riella; Rachael A Clark Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2021-04-15 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Flemming Puscz; Mehran Dadras; Alexander Dermietzel; Frank Jacobsen; Marcus Lehnhardt; Björn Behr; Tobias Hirsch; Maximilian Kueckelhaus Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-06-26 Impact factor: 3.240