Laura C Burlage1,2,3, Shannon N Tessier1,3, Joanna W Etra4, Korkut Uygun1,3, Gerald Brandacher4. 1. Department of Surgery, Center for Engineering in Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Department of Surgery, Section Hepato-Pancreato-Bilibary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 3. Shriners Hospitals for Children - Boston, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation (VCA) Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, we discuss novel strategies that allow for extended preservation of vascularized composite allografts and their potential future clinical implications for the field of vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA). RECENT FINDINGS: The current gold standard in tissue preservation - static cold preservation on ice - is insufficient to preserve VCA grafts for more than a few hours. Advancements in the field of VCA regarding matching and allocation, desensitization, and potential tolerance induction are all within reasonable reach to achieve; these are, however, constrained by limited preservation time of VCA grafts. Although machine perfusion holds many advantages over static cold preservation, it currently does not elongate the preservation time. More extreme preservation techniques, such as cryopreservation approaches, are, however, specifically difficult to apply to composite tissues as the susceptibility to ischemia and cryoprotectant agents varies greatly by tissue type. SUMMARY: In the current scope of extended preservation protocols, high subzero approaches of VCA grafts will be particularly critical enabling technologies for the implementation of tolerance protocols clinically. Ultimately, advances in both preservation techniques and tolerance induction have the potential to transform the field of VCA and eventually lead to broad applications in reconstructive transplantation.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, we discuss novel strategies that allow for extended preservation of vascularized composite allografts and their potential future clinical implications for the field of vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA). RECENT FINDINGS: The current gold standard in tissue preservation - static cold preservation on ice - is insufficient to preserve VCA grafts for more than a few hours. Advancements in the field of VCA regarding matching and allocation, desensitization, and potential tolerance induction are all within reasonable reach to achieve; these are, however, constrained by limited preservation time of VCA grafts. Although machine perfusion holds many advantages over static cold preservation, it currently does not elongate the preservation time. More extreme preservation techniques, such as cryopreservation approaches, are, however, specifically difficult to apply to composite tissues as the susceptibility to ischemia and cryoprotectant agents varies greatly by tissue type. SUMMARY: In the current scope of extended preservation protocols, high subzero approaches of VCA grafts will be particularly critical enabling technologies for the implementation of tolerance protocols clinically. Ultimately, advances in both preservation techniques and tolerance induction have the potential to transform the field of VCA and eventually lead to broad applications in reconstructive transplantation.
Authors: Mihai A Constantinescu; Erhard Knall; Xiufang Xu; David M Kiermeir; Hansjörg Jenni; Erich Gygax; Robert Rieben; Andrej Banič; Esther Vögelin Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2010-02-21 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Madeline Fryer; Johanna Grahammer; Saami Khalifian; Georg J Furtmüller; W P Andrew Lee; Giorgio Raimondi; Gerald Brandacher Journal: Expert Rev Clin Immunol Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 4.473
Authors: Patrick Duhamel; Caroline Suberbielle; Philippe Grimbert; Thomas Leclerc; Christian Jacquelinet; Benoit Audry; Laurent Bargues; Dominique Charron; Eric Bey; Laurent Lantieri; Mikael Hivelin Journal: Transpl Int Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 3.782
Authors: Evelyn T Pan; Dor Yoeli; N Thao N Galvan; Michael L Kueht; Ronald T Cotton; Christine A O'Mahony; John A Goss; Abbas Rana Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Nicole L Werner; Fares Alghanem; Stephanie L Rakestraw; Dylan C Sarver; Bruce Nicely; Richard E Pietroski; Paul Lange; Steven M Rudich; Christopher L Mendias; Alvaro Rojas-Pena; John C Magee; Robert H Bartlett; Kagan Ozer Journal: Transplantation Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Theresa Hautz; Tilman Hickethier; Michael J F Blumer; Mario Bitsche; Johanna Grahammer; Martin Hermann; Bettina Zelger; Franka Messner; Elisabeth J Pechriggl; Christoph Krapf; Michael Kimelman; Gerald Brandacher; W P Andrew Lee; Raimund Margreiter; Johann Pratschke; Stefan Schneeberger Journal: Transplantation Date: 2014-10-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Laura C Burlage; Alexandre G Lellouch; Corentin B Taveau; Philipp Tratnig-Frankl; Casie A Pendexter; Mark A Randolph; Robert J Porte; Laurent A Lantieri; Shannon N Tessier; Curtis L Cetrulo; Korkut Uygun Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2021-10-17 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Kaj Brouwers; Max F Thijssen; Anne Sophie Kruit; Dominique van Midden; Erik J Koers; Her J H Zegers; Stefan Hummelink; Dietmar J O Ulrich Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2022-02-21