Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the most frequently injured ligament in the knee for which surgery is performed. United States national estimates of ACL reconstruction vary widely.
PURPOSE: This study sought to use the most recently available Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data to investigate changes in the utilization of inpatient and ambulatory surgery for ACL tears in the United States. STUDY
DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiology study.
METHODS: The National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery, conducted in 1994, 1995, 1996, and 2006 (data from 1994, 1996, and 2006 were used in the study), and the National Hospital Discharge Survey, conducted between 1990 and 2007, were used to identify cases of ACL reconstruction. The data were analyzed for trends in demographics, treatment, and utilization.
RESULTS: Between 1994 and 2006, the population-adjusted estimate of the rate of ACL reconstructions increased by 37% (33.0/100,000 capita or 86,837 total procedures to 45.1/100,000 capita or 134,421 total procedures). There was an increase in the proportion of females undergoing reconstruction in both the ambulatory (30% to 40%) and inpatient (29% to 47%) settings over the study period, with a 304% increase in the sex-adjusted estimate of the rate of female ambulatory procedures between 1994 and 2006. Age-adjusted estimates of the rates of ambulatory ACL reconstruction increased among all age groups, with a 924% increase in patients less than 15 years of age. Concurrent meniscectomy remained relatively constant in the ambulatory (37% to 40%) and inpatient (37% to 33%) settings between 1994 and 2007. Private insurance was the largest compensator, representing 77% of cases in 2006. Between 1994 and 2006, the use of peripheral nerve blocks during ambulatory surgery increased from 0.7% to 30.8%.
CONCLUSION: The rate of ACL reconstruction increased dramatically between 1990 and 2007 based on the National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery and National Hospital Discharge Survey databases, which represents the most up-to-date publicly available data. Knowledge of this increase and national practice patterns may aid policy makers and surgeons in appropriately allocating health care resources to ensure quality patient care.

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is cited as the most frequently injured ligament in the knee that requires surgical reconstruction.[17,24] Anterior cruciate ligament injuries most commonly occur in athletes playing multidirectional sports.[17,32] Affected individuals suffer both time loss from sport and an increased risk of premature osteoarthritis.[40,45] While a plethora of literature exists regarding ACL reconstruction techniques, graft choice, individual practice patterns, and postoperative complications, the majority of studies focus on small cohorts of patients.[2,10,28,31,37]

Attempts to capture population-based trends have led to the creation of ACL registries like those for college and high school athletes,[41,42] as well as the MOON (Multicenter Orthopedic Outcomes Network)[15] and MARS (Multicenter ACL Revision Study)[34] registries. These studies account for a small percentage of the total burden of ACL injury in the United States, potentially limiting their generalizability. Additional epidemiologic studies evaluating ACL injury include the study by Dunn et al,[14] who evaluated the burden of injury among US soldiers, a study by Lyman et al[31] evaluating trends of ACL reconstruction in the state of New York, and a study by Nielsen and Yde[43] prospectively evaluating the rate of ACL injuries over a 1-year period in emergency rooms. Resulting national estimates of the incidence of ACL reconstruction vary widely between 60,000 and 175,000.[31,38]

Knowledge of the incidence and patterns of disease burden are necessary for the creation of national injury prevention programs[16,53] and for the appropriate allocation of limited healthcare resources. The purpose of this study was to determine national trends in resource utilization for ambulatory and inpatient ACL reconstruction with a specific focus on age, sex, concurrent meniscal surgery, surgical setting, anesthetic type, and payment method.

Materials and Methods

Data Source

Data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS)[6] and the National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery (NSAS)[5] databases were used to analyze trends in the surgical management of ACL tears from 1990 to 2007. This represents the most recent, publicly available national data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The NHDS and NSAS are mutually exclusive in that cases recorded in one are not recorded in the other. Because the NSAS and NHDS are administrative datasets in which all data are deidentified and available for public use, this study was exempt from approval by our institutional review board.

Since 1965, the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) has been collecting data for the NHDS database annually to compile nationally representative data on inpatient utilization of short-stay hospitals.[12] Using a stratified multistage probability design, the NHDS retrieves an annual sample of more than 250,000 discharges from nonfederal short-stay hospitals (average length of stay, <30 days) in the United States and District of Columbia.[22] All facilities must have at least 6 beds for patient use to be included in the study. The NHDS collects demographic information (age, sex, race), expected source of payment (insurance status), medical information of up to 7 discharge diagnoses and up to 4 procedures, length of care, hospital size, US region, and inpatient outcomes including discharge destination.[36] In comparison, the NSAS is a national study involving both hospital-based and freestanding ambulatory surgery centers, which provides the most recent and comprehensive overview of ambulatory surgery in the United States.[25] The survey was conducted in 1994, 1995, 1996, and in 2006 (data from 1994, 1996, and 2006 were used in this study), with medical information recorded on patient abstracts coded by NCHS contract staff. Both databases use International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes[4] to classify medical diagnoses and procedures. The weighting procedure used in the NHDS and NSAS databases produces an unbiased national estimate by utilizing multistage estimate procedures, including inflation by reciprocals of the probabilities of sample selection, adjustment for no response, and population-weighting ratio adjustments.[8,12]

Study Population

Demographic and medical information was obtained for individuals undergoing cruciate ligament reconstruction between 1990 and 2007. The ICD-9-CM was used to identify cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures.[4] Discharges with a procedure code (ICD-9-CM) of isolated cruciate ligament reconstruction (81.45) were included in the sample using previously described techniques.[31,51] Notably, the ICD-9-CM code 81.45 is defined as “cruciate ligament repair,” not allowing for a differentiation between anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. However, a previous investigation by Lyman et al[31] demonstrated that 99.3% of all outpatient “cruciate ligament repair” (81.45) procedures were ACL reconstructions when compared with concurrent Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Because the CDC databases used for this study do not include CPT codes, we were unable to differentiate between anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. However, because of the high proportion reported by Lyman et al,[31] inclusion of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the cohort likely represents a rare occurrence.

ICD-9 diagnosis codes identified as having a high frequency of association with ACL injury were then used to further query the databases and isolate ACL reconstructions (Table 1). Procedures with only a diagnosis of “disruption of posterior cruciate ligament” (717.84) were excluded from the analysis. The remaining procedures (ACL reconstructions) were included for data analysis. Surgical procedure codes were utilized first because reimbursement is driven more by procedures than by diagnoses, as previously described.[31] The NSAS and NHDS data were then recorded for age, sex, facility type, insurance type, anesthesia type, diagnoses, and procedures. Concomitant procedures on the meniscus were recorded separately by querying the database for procedures with an ICD-9 procedure code of 80.6 (excision of semilunar cartilage of the knee). Because there is no specific ICD-9 code for meniscal repair, this study only evaluated those ACL reconstructions where concurrent meniscectomy was performed.

TABLE 1

ICD-9 Diagnosis Codes Used for Data Analysis

Diagnosis Code	Diagnosis Description
717.83	Disruption of anterior cruciate ligament
844.2	Sprain of cruciate ligament of knee
717.84	Disruption of posterior cruciate ligament

ICD-9, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision.

Statistical Analysis

Because of the large sample size, we assumed a normal distribution of the data. Descriptive statistics consisted of means and standard errors for continuous variables and frequencies and percentages for discrete variables. We analyzed the NSAS and NHDS data using a sampling weighting method. The survey data were collected based on a probabilistic sample scheme. Therefore, we used sampling weights (the inverse of selection probability) provided by the CDC to account for unequal sampling probabilities and to produce estimates for all visits in the United States. A Taylor linearization model provided by the CDC estimates was used to calculate standard error and confidence intervals of the data. Standard error is a measure of sampling variability that occurs by chance because only a sample rather than the entire universe is surveyed. We selected a 95% confidence interval along with a point estimate to define population parameters. These confidence intervals, when compared between years, can be suggestive of statistical differences if the data are nonoverlapping. However, direct statistical comparison between years could not be performed because of sampling differences in the database. United States census data were used to obtain national population estimates for each year of the study (1990-2007).[52] Rates were presented as the number of ACL reconstructions per 100,000 standard population. Applying sex-specific rates to the standard population and dividing by the total in the standard population, we calculated sex-adjusted rates for each year. For age, a direct adjustment procedure was used, and the US population in 2000 was selected as the standard population, as suggested by the director of the Department of Health and Human Services for NCHS databases.[26,46] All data were analyzed using the software Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20 (IBM).

Results

Total Number of Procedures

A total of 127,446 ambulatory surgical procedures (95% CI, 114,752-140,139) or 42.7 per 100,000 capita were recorded by the NSAS for the treatment of ACL tears in 2006. This represents a large increase in the total number of ambulatory procedures from 37,203 (95% CI, 34,018-40,387) in 1994 (14 per 100,000 capita) to 61,454 (95% CI, 55,191-67,717) in 1995 (23.1 per 100,000 capita) to 71,953 (95% CI, 65,908-77,997) in 1996 (26.7 per 100,000 capita) (Figure 1). Paralleling the increase in total number of procedures, the proportion of ambulatory surgical procedures performed for ACL tear also increased between 1996 and 2006. Specifically, in 2006, the NSAS database estimated a total of 34,738,440 ambulatory surgical procedures, meaning 0.37% of these procedures were for the treatment of ACL tears. In contrast, the NSAS database estimated a total of 21,236,913 ambulatory surgical procedures in 1996, meaning 0.34% were for the treatment of ACL tears. The total number of inpatient ACL reconstructions reported by the NHDS decreased over time from 45,030 (95% CI, 40,913-49,147) in 1990 (18 per 100,000 capita) to 35,247 (95% CI, 27,371-43,122) in 1996 (13 per 100,000 capita), 21,547 (95% CI, 15,846-27,248) in 2000 (7 per 100,000 capita), 6975 (95% CI, 4104-9846) in 2006 (2 per 100,000 capita), and 4043 (95% CI, 1745-9846) in 2007 (1 per 100,000 capita) (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Volume of inpatient and ambulatory national anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in 1994, 1996, and 2006.

Sex

During the study period, more men than women underwent ACL reconstruction in both the inpatient and outpatient settings, though the difference diminished over time. In 1994, 69.8% of outpatient ACL reconstructions were performed on males (20.5 per 100,000 capita male vs 8.4 per 100,000 capita female). However, in 2006, the gap between males and females narrowed, with 60.0% of outpatient ACL reconstructions being performed on males (53.1 per 100,000 capita male vs 34.0 per 100,000 capita female). These findings are similar to the results of the NHDS dataset. In 1990, 71.1% of the inpatient ACL reconstructions were performed on males (26.0 per 100,000 per capita male vs 10.1 per 100,000 per capita female). In contrast, in 1996, 55.9% of the inpatient ACL reconstructions were performed on males (15.2 per 100,000 per capita male vs 11.5 per 100,000 per capita female), and in 2006, 53.4% of inpatient ACL reconstructions were performed on males (2.9 per 100,000 per capita male vs 2.2 per 100,000 per capita female). Tables 2 and 3 demonstrate the sex differences in population-adjusted rates of ACL surgery and the percent change between 1994 and 2006 overall and divided by surgical setting, respectively.

TABLE 2

Changes in Population- and Sex-Adjusted Rates of All ACL Reconstructions in the US

	1994	1996	2006	Percentage Change (2006 vs 1994)
Male	46.9	52.7	55.7	19
Female	20.5	28.7	36.2	77
Overall	33	39.8	45.1	37

Values are reported as rate per 100,000 capita. ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; US, United States.

TABLE 3

Changes in Population- and Sex-Adjusted Rates of Ambulatory and Inpatient ACL Reconstructions

	1994	1996	2006	Percentage Change (2006 vs 1994)
Ambulatory
Male	20.5	31.6	53.1	160
Female	8.4	15.6	34.0	304
Overall	14.1	26.7	42.7	202
Inpatient
Male	26.4	15.2	2.6	−924
Female	13	11.5	2.2	−498
Overall	18.9	13.1	2.3	−706

Values are reported as rate per 100,000 capita. ACL, anterior cruciate ligament.

Age

The mean patient age for outpatient procedures remained constant between 1994 (28.8 years; 95% CI, 25.7-31.8) and 2006 (28.7 years; 95% CI, 26.6-30.8). Similarly, the mean patient age for inpatient ACL reconstructions remained constant between 1990 (27.0 years; 95% CI, 24.7-29.4), 1996 (27.7 years; 95% CI, 24.0-31.4), and 2007 (26.0 years; 95% CI, 16.6-35.5). The age-adjusted rate of ambulatory ACL reconstruction increased for all age groups, with the largest increase (924%) seen in patients younger than 15 years (Table 4). Conversely, the age-adjusted rate of inpatient procedures decreased among all age groups, with the largest decrease seen in the population aged 15 to 34 years (Table 4).

TABLE 4

Observed and Age-Adjusted Rates of ACL Reconstruction With Use of the US Population in 2000 as the Control

Outpatient Age, y	NSAS 1994		NSAS 1995		NSAS 1996		NSAS 2006		Percentage Change Adjusted Rate (2006 vs 1994)
	Observedb	Age-Adjusted	Observedb	Age-Adjusted	Observedb	Age-Adjusted	Observedb	Age-Adjusted
0-14	8.55	1.84	17.52	3.76	15.32	3.29	87.8	18.85	924
15-34	346.53	95.02	580.56	159.2	623.29	170.92	1073.2	294.29	210
35-54	121.86	36.24	198.94	59.17	267.93	79.69	476.6	141.76	291
≥55	11.03	2.36	7.64	1.63	37.89	8.09	42.8	9.15	288

NHDS, National Hospital Discharge Survey; NSAS, National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery; US, United States.

Rate per 100,000 capita.

Facility Type

As the total number of surgeries performed over the study period increased, so did the proportion of procedures performed in an ambulatory setting. In 1994, 13.8% of outpatient surgeries for ACL reconstruction were performed in a freestanding ambulatory facility. In 2006, 53.4% of these procedures took place in a freestanding ambulatory facility, representing an increase of 39.6% (Figure 2). The observed rate of outpatient surgical procedures increased by 300% (14.1 to 42.7 per 100,000 capita) between 1994 and 2007 while inpatient surgical procedures decreased 706% (18.9 per 100,000 to 2.3 per 100,000 capita) between 1994 and 2006 (Table 3). At all time points, NHDS data demonstrated that the majority (70.9%-85.5%) of inpatient ACL reconstructions occurred in nonprofit facilities. Additionally, the proportion of inpatient ACL reconstructions taking place in proprietary hospitals decreased from 17.5% in 1990 to 4.8% in 2006.

Figure 2.

Proportion of outpatient anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions performed in a freestanding ambulatory surgery center versus hospital-based ambulatory center.

Anesthesia

The use of general anesthesia alone decreased over the study period from 83.3% of the total anesthesia usage in 1994 to 60.9% in 2006 (Table 5). The use of regional anesthesia combined with general anesthesia increased from 0.1% in 1994 to 25.7% in 2006. The use of regional anesthesia alone increased from 0.7% in 1994 to 5% in 2006. Intravenous anesthesia use was 3.0% in 1994 and increased to 7.4% in 2006.

TABLE 5

Type of Anesthesia Used for Outpatient ACL Reconstructions

	NSAS 1994	NSAS 1995	NSAS 1996	NSAS 2006
Regional block	0.7	0.2	2.6	5.0
Regional block with general	0.1	0.5	1.0	25.7
General alone	84.3	81.3	75.3	60.9
Monitored anesthesia care	0.6	0.5	1.1	1.0
Intravenous sedation	3.0	4.4	7.5	7.4

Values are reported as percentages. ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; NSAS, National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery.

Insurance

Between 1994 and 2007, private insurance was the primary source of payment for ACL reconstruction in both the inpatient and outpatient setting (Figure 3). An increasing trend was seen in Medicare, Medicaid, and other governmental payment for inpatient procedures, which represented 4.6% in 1990, 5.5% in 1996, and 13.8% in 2007.

Figure 3.

Primary source of payment for inpatient and outpatient anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions between 1990 and 2007. HMO, health maintenance organization; NHDS, National Hospital Discharge Survey; NSAS, National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery; PPO, preferred provider organization.

Concurrent Meniscus Surgery

The percentage of patients undergoing concurrent meniscus surgery during their ACL reconstructions is represented in Table 6. In 1994, 37.0% (5.2 per 100,000 capita) of the patients undergoing outpatient ACL reconstruction underwent concurrent meniscus surgery. Similarly, in 2006, 39.9% (17.0 per 100,000 capita) of patients undergoing outpatient ACL reconstructions underwent concurrent meniscus surgery. From the NHDS data, the proportion of inpatient ACL reconstructions performed with concomitant meniscus surgery in 1990 was 23.7% (4.3 per 100,000 capita), 36.5% (6.9 per 100,000 capita) in 1994, and 32.8% in 2007 (0.4 per 100,000 capita).

TABLE 6

Proportion of ACL Reconstructions Undergoing Concurrent Meniscus Surgery

	Outpatient				Inpatient
	NSAS 1994	NSAS 1995	NSAS 1996	NSAS 2006	NHDS 1990	NHDS 1994	NHDS 1996	NHDS 2006
Total	13,769	24,446	23,905	50,798	10,652	18,127	10,224	2276
% ACL	37.0	39.8	33.2	39.9	23.7	36.5	29.0	32.6
Rateb	5.2	9.2	8.9	17.0	4.3	6.9	3.8	0.76
% male	76.1	74.7	65.4	65.9	74.8	71.0	53.8	47.4

ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; NHDS, National Hospital Discharge Survey; NSAS, National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery.

Per 100,000 capita.

Discussion

This descriptive epidemiologic study investigated trends in inpatient and ambulatory surgery for ACL reconstruction between 1990 and 2007 using the NSAS[5] and the NHDS.[6] Our results demonstrated that the total number of ACL reconstructions performed in the United States increased from 33.0 per 100,000 capita in 1994 to 45.1 per 100,000 capita in 2006. The number of procedures performed in the ambulatory setting increased from 14 per 100,000 capita in 1994 to 43 per 100,000 capita in 2006, whereas the number of inpatient ACL reconstructions decreased from 18 to 1 per 100,000 capita between 1990 and 2007. The total number of ACL reconstructions (inpatient and ambulatory) increased from 86,837 (33 per 100,000 capita) in 1994 to 134,421 (45 per 100,000 capita) in 2006. Our findings are similar to those predicted by Lyman et al,[31] who extrapolated their data in New York State to the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample to predict a total of 62,637 total procedures in 1997 and 105,118 in 2006. Many explanations exist for the rise in ACL reconstruction over time. It is possible that the increased frequency represents an increase in the frequency of ACL injury. It is also possible that the increase represents an increased likelihood of reconstruction should an injury occur, which has previously been suggested by Dunn et al.[14] When compared with population-adjusted rates observed in other nations, the results of this study demonstrate the United States has the second highest known rate of ACL reconstruction behind Australia (52.0 per 100,000 capita between 2003 and 2008),[24] with national estimates from other countries, including Denmark (38 per 100,000 capita),[30] New Zealand (37.8 per 100,000),[17] Norway (34 per 100,000),[19] and Sweden (32 per 100,000).[20] One possible explanation for the higher rates of ACL reconstruction in the United States than in European countries may be a treatment bias, or an increased likelihood of having surgery when presenting with an ACL tear, in the United States. As the compensation of many US surgeons is correlated with productivity, it is possible this trend reflects an increased likelihood to operate, whereas surgeons in many other countries are salaried. It is also possible that the increased rate of ACL reconstructions correlates with the increased use of artificial turf, which has been shown to be associated with a 1.39 times higher rate of ACL injury than grass surfaces among National Collegiate Athletic Association football players.[13]

Overall, this study found that the proportion of ambulatory ACL reconstructions performed on males decreased from 69.8% in 1994 to 60.0% in 2006. Similarly, inpatient ACL reconstructions among males decreased from 71.1% in 1990 to 52.7% in 2007. These findings are similar to those reported by Csintalan et al,[9] who evaluated Kaiser Permanente’s database and noted the overall number of males suffering an ACL injury was higher than the number of females (68.4% vs 31.0%). One explanation for the higher proportion of males compared with females is participation bias, with males participating in sports associated with ACL injury more frequently than females. However, between 1994 and 2006, our study demonstrated a 177% increase in the sex-adjusted rate of women undergoing ACL reconstruction, with a 404% increase in the outpatient setting. Not surprisingly, an increased rate of ACL reconstruction among females parallels the finding that female participation in sports has reached an all-time high.[54] Previous studies have shown a higher prevalence of knee injuries in female athletes[11,23,45] as well as sex differences in ACL tears among national elite athletes.[1] It is also possible that the increased rate of ACL reconstructions among females reflects an indirect effect of the Title IX law, which states that on the basis of sex, people cannot be excluded from participation or denied benefits or subjected to discrimination under education programs or activities receiving federal financial assistance. Thus, a greater proportion of females are likely playing “change of direction” sports into the college years, increasing their exposure to potential ACL injury. Interestingly, this dramatic rise in ACL reconstructions occurred despite the introduction of neuromuscular and proprioceptive injury prevention programs that have been shown to reduce the incidence of ACL tears up to 74%.[33] Knowledge regarding this increased rate of reconstruction among female athletes can further aid in the design of preventive programs targeting this high-risk population.

Over the study period, age-adjusted rates of ACL reconstruction increased by 924% among patients younger than 15 years, which likely reflects an increased participation in youth sports among adolescents in the United States.[44] It is also possible that the increase in ACL reconstructions among the youth population reflects a treatment bias, with the emerging field of pediatric sports medicine. Furthermore, it is possible the increase reflects reporting bias. Recently, studies have reported similar findings regarding an increase in ACL injuries among young athletes,[27,28,47] with many surgeons recommending reconstruction due to the risk of subsequent meniscal injury and early osteoarthritis in the affected knee.[18,29]

This study evaluated the incidence of concurrent meniscus surgery during ACL reconstruction. We found that between 1994 and 2006, the proportion of ACL reconstructions with a concurrent meniscus surgery remained constant in both the ambulatory (37.0% and 39.9%) and inpatient (36.5% and 32.8%) settings. Previous studies have reported the incidence of concomitant meniscal injury in ACL tears ranges from 55% to 65%,[3,7,49] with multiple reports demonstrating better clinical outcomes when menisci are intact or repaired at the time of ACL reconstruction.[3,48] Because of limitations in ICD-9 coding, this study was only able to evaluate the rates of meniscectomy. However, our results are similar to those reported by Musahl et al,[39] who found 34% of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction underwent concomitant partial meniscectomy. Understanding the burden of concomitant meniscal injury at the time of index surgery may help surgeons during preoperative planning.

The present study demonstrated that anesthesia for ACL reconstruction has changed over time. Between 1994 and 2006, there was a large increase in the number of procedures performed using regional blocks (0.7% to 30.8%), with or without concomitant general anesthesia. Peripheral nerve blocks are a safe and cost-effective method of pain control for knee surgery when compared with general anesthesia,[50] and the increased rate of regional blocks will likely continue to parallel the rise in ambulatory procedures moving forward.

Drawing inferences from large data sets has limitations. Like all large databases, the NSAS and NHDS are subject to coding error[25] or error in data entry.[21,35] For example, because ICD-9-CM codes were used to retrieve the diagnoses and procedures, there is a possibility of misclassification error. However, the database administrators correct for this by using a multistage estimate procedure with weighting adjustments for no response and population weighting ratio adjustments.[25] Similarly, the use of the ICD-9 code 81.45 (cruciate ligament repair) may have resulted in misclassification because it does not differentiate between anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. However, a study by Lyman et al[31] demonstrated that when using the ICD-9 code 81.45 to search for ACL reconstructions, 99.3% of all procedures were ACL reconstructions. In addition, we used the ICD-9 diagnosis code 717.84 (disruption of posterior cruciate ligament) to exclude isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Therefore, misidentification of a posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction as an ACL reconstruction was likely a rare occurrence in this study, and we believe the data presented are representative of national trends in ACL reconstruction. Additionally, the use of the ICD-9 code 80.6 (excision of semilunar cartilage of knee) allowed for the identification of concurrent meniscectomy. However, this study cannot identify trends in meniscus repair, as there are no ICD-9 codes specific for repair. Another limitation of this study is its lack of clinical detail such as mechanism of injury or complexity of the procedure, as procedure codes are general and do not allow differentiation between specific patients. Finally, the results of this study are limited to practice patterns in the United States from 1990 to 2007. As trends in health care utilization can have substantial effects on policy and allocation of resources, this study demonstrates a need for additional national funding into surveys such as the NSAS beyond 2006.

In conclusion, this study demonstrates that the population-adjusted rate of ACL surgery has increased in the United States between 1990 and 2006 to 45.1 per 100,000 capita. This analysis of nationally representative data allows investigators to draw conclusions about national trends in ACL reconstruction, which may help guide future questions that can be tested in a clinical setting.