| Literature DB >> 26535064 |
Yingying Zhao1, Yuqiong Wang2, Yuefeng Yang3, Jingqi Liu1, Yang Song1, Yan Cao1, Xiaoyu Chen1, Wenzhuo Yang1, Fei Wang1, Jun Gao4, Zhaoshen Li4, Changqing Yang1.
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the most common cancers and has a poor prognosis due to late diagnosis and ineffective therapeutic multimodality. MicroRNAs (miRNAs, miRs) are a group of non-coding, small RNAs with active biological activities. In our investigation, human pancreatic cancer cell line Capan-2 were transfected with miR-222 mimics, inhibitors or their negative controls. Cell proliferation was assessed by Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8), EdU incorporation assay and cell cycle determination by flow cytometry. MiR-222 and putative target gene expression levels including p27, p57 and PTEN were determined using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reactions and Western blotting. Our results showed that miR-222 could lead to increased vitality and proliferative rate of Capan-2 cells, and also higher S-phase and lower G1-phase of cell cycle. Further, we found p57 at protein level, but not p27 nor PTEN, was regulated by miR-222 in Capan-2 cells. Finally, we co-transfected miR-222 inhibitor and p57 si-RNA into Capan-2 cells, and found that proliferation-suppressing effects of miR-222 inhibitor on Capan-2 cells could be partially reversed by silencing p57. Our results indicate that miR-222 controls Capan-2 cell proliferation by targeting p57. This study provides a novel idea for developing effective therapeutic strategy for PC patients through inhibiting miR-222.Entities:
Keywords: Capan-2; MiR-222; MicroRNA; P57.; Pancreatic cancer; Proliferation
Year: 2015 PMID: 26535064 PMCID: PMC4622853 DOI: 10.7150/jca.12546
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer ISSN: 1837-9664 Impact factor: 4.207
Figure 1Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reactions confirm that miR-222 mimics and inhibitors take effects in Capan-2 cells. The expression level of miR-222 was significantly up-regulated in Capan-2 cells transfected with miR-222 mimics (A), while downregulated with miR-222 inhibitors (B) compared to negative control (NC) (n=6). *p<0.05, ** p<0.01 vs. NC.
Figure 2Effects of miR-222 in the proliferation of Capan-2 cells. (A) CCK-8 assay (n=10) showed that Capan-2 cells transfected with miR-222 mimic showed an increased cell vitality while Capan-2 cells transfected with miR-222 inhibitor showed a decreased cell vitality than their respective negative controls (NC) (n=10). (B) The EdU positive cells rate was increased by transfection of miR-222 mimic, while miR-222 inhibitor treated Capan-2 cells had a lower EdU positive cells rate (n=6). (C) Decreased G1-phase cells rate and increased S-phase cells rate were observed in miR-222 mimic treated Capan-2 cells by flow cytometry, instead, G1-phase cells rate was increased and S-phase cells rate was decreased in miR-222 inhibitor treated Capan-2 cells (n=6). *p<0.05, ** p<0.01, vs. NC.
Figure 3P57 was regulated by miR-222 in Capan-2 cells. (A) P57 protein level was decreased in miR-222 mimic transfected Capan-2 cells (A), while was increased in miR-222 inhibitor transfected Capan-2 cells (B). Neither PTEN nor p27 was regulated by miR-222 in Capan-2 cells at protein level (n=3).
Figure 4Silencing P57 restored the proliferation-suppressing effect of miR-222 inhibitor on Capan-2 cells. (A) The p57 mRNA level was downregulated by p57 siRNA, as demonstrated by quantitative real-time PCR (n=6). (B) Silencing p57 could partially reverse the inhibitory effect of miR-222 inhibitor on the proliferation of Capan-2 cells (n=6). *p<0.05, ** p<0.01.