| Literature DB >> 26531834 |
Satoko Shin1, Nobumichi Shutoh2, Miho Tonai3, Naoko Ogata4.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of regular ingestion of capsaicin-containing food that is easily available in everyday life on the latency of the swallowing response (LSR). Pickled Napa cabbage was selected as the food for the present study. One portion (10 g) of pickled Napa cabbage provides 1.5 µg of capsaicin. Participants ingested pickled Napa cabbage (10 g) before every meal for 20 days (days 1-20). LSR was measured pre-intervention (day 0) and post-intervention (day 21). The participants then followed their regular diet, without foods containing red pepper, from day 21 to day 27, and LSR was measured on day 28 (follow-up LSR). Sixteen elderly participants (two male, 14 female; age 81.6 ± 9.39 years) and 10 young participants (all female; age 21.6 ± 0.52 years) participated in the study. The pre-intervention LSR was 2.04 ± 1.60 s in elderly participants and 1.27 ± 0.27 s in young participants. In the elderly group, the post-intervention LSR (day 21) was 1.47 ± 1.05 the follow-up LSR (day 28) was 1.99 ± 1.80 s (p = 0.044 and 0.502, respectively, compared to pre-intervention). In the young group, the post-intervention and follow-up LSR values were 1.07 ± 0.20 s and 1.04 ± 0.10 s, respectively (p = 0.016 and 0.038, respectively, compared to pre-intervention). Swallowing function was improved by pickled Napa cabbage containing capsaicin, but capsaicin supplementation may need to be maintained to have an ongoing effect.Entities:
Keywords: Deglutition; Deglutition disorders; Elderly; Food; Improvement; Swallowing response
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26531834 PMCID: PMC4824833 DOI: 10.1007/s00455-015-9668-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dysphagia ISSN: 0179-051X Impact factor: 3.438
Capsaicin concentration
| Food | Capsaicin content (mg per 100g) |
|---|---|
| Kimichi | 0.6 |
| Fried budock root | 0.1 |
| Japanese pickled Napa cabbage manufacturer A | 0.01 |
| Japanese pickled Napa cabbage manufacturer B | 0.009 |
| Japanese pickled Napa cabbage manufacturer C, sample 1 | 0.011 |
| Japanese pickled Napa cabbage manufacturer C, sample 2 | 0.025 |
| Japanese pickled Napa cabbage manufacturer C, sample 3 | 0.012 |
| Japanese pickled Napa cabbage manufacturer C, sample 4 | 0.015 |
| Japanese pickled Napa cabbage manufacturer C, sample 5 | 0.012 |
Fig. 1Probability density estimation of the latency of the swallowing response in elderly (a) and young (b) participants at day 0 (pre intervention; blue line), day 21 (post intervention; red line), and day 28 (follow up; orange line)
Latency of the swallowing response in elderly and young groups
| Elderly group ( | Young group ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-intervention LSR (s) | 2.04 ± 1.60 | 1.27 ± 0.27 |
| Post-intervention LSR (s) | 1.47 ± 1.05* | 1.07 ± 0.20** |
| Follow-up LSR (s) | 1.99 ± 1.801 | 1.04 ± 0.10** |
LSR the latency of the swallowing response
Bootstrap test (vs pre-intervention LSR for each group): * p < 0.10, ** p < 0.05
1n=15
Fig. 2The latency of the swallowing response in elderly (a) and young (b) participants. Horizontal bars represent the mean value (n = 16 at pre- and post-intervention time points in the elderly group, n = 15 at the follow-up time point in the elderly group, and n = 10 at each time point in the young group). Asterisks indicate a significant difference between the time points (*p < 0.10, **p < 0.05). Statistical analyses were performed using a bootstrap test