| Literature DB >> 26531313 |
Deniz Güngör1, Michelle E Kruijshaar2, Iris Plug3, Dimitris Rizopoulos4, Tim A Kanters5, Stephan C A Wens6, Arnold J J Reuser7, Pieter A van Doorn8, Ans T van der Ploeg9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pompe disease is an inheritable metabolic disorder for which enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) has been available since 2006. Effects of ERT have been shown on distance walked, pulmonary function and survival. We investigated whether it also improves quality of life and participation in daily life in adult patients with the disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26531313 PMCID: PMC4754323 DOI: 10.1007/s10545-015-9889-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Inherit Metab Dis ISSN: 0141-8955 Impact factor: 4.982
Fig. 1Flowchart of the study population for the analyses
Characteristics of the study population
| Demographics | Study population |
| Age at start of ERT, median (range) | 50 (24–76) |
| Age at diagnosis, median (range) | 37 (1–66) |
| Female gender, no. (%) | 93 (53) |
| Country of residence, no. (%) | |
| Netherlands | 64 (37) |
| Germany | 36 (21) |
| US | 39 (22) |
| UK | 16 (9) |
| Other | 19 (11) |
| Clinical characteristics | |
| Disease duration, median (range) | 12 (1–33) |
| Use of wheelchair at start of ERT, no. (%) | 90 (52) |
| Respiratory support at start of ERT, no. (%)* | 84 (48) |
| Follow-up during study | |
| Total follow-up time, median (range) | 7 (1–10) |
| Pre-treatment period, median (range) | 4 (0.5–8) |
| Treatment period, median (range) | 4 (0.5–8) |
Age, disease duration and follow-up time are expressed in years as median (range). Categorical variables are expressed as number (no.) and percentage (%);
*‘Respiratory support’ includes partial and fulltime, invasive and non-invasive respiratory support
SF-36 quality of life scores before and during ERT
| Clinical outcome measure | Follow-up time intervals (in years) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| SF-36 Component summary scores | Pre-ERT | 0 to 2 years during ERT | >2 years during ERT |
| Physical component summary | -0.73 (-1.07; -0.39)** | 1.49 (0.76; 2.21)** | -0.15 (-0.43; 0.13) |
| Mental component summary | 0.16 (-0.25; 0.57) | 1.03 (-0.07; 2.13) | 0.02 (-0.41; 0.46) |
| SF-36 domain scores | |||
| Physical functioning | -1.80 (-2.41; -1.19)** | 1.81 (0.38; 3.23)* | 0.68 (0.12; 1.25)* |
| Role physical | -1.20 (-2.92; 0.52) | 9.18 (5.83; 12.53)** | 2.46 (1.15; 3.77)** |
| Bodily pain | -2.10 (-3.01; -1.19) ** | 0.76 (-1.39; 2.92) | -1.96 (-2.95; -0.98)** |
| General health | 0.19 (-0.49; 0.87) | 5.22 (3.58; 6.86)** | 0.81 (0.13; 1.49)* |
| Vitality | -0.44 (-1.11; 0.24) | 4.10 (2.44; 5.76)** | 1.43 (0.77; 2.09)** |
| Social functioning | -0.74 (-1.66; 0.18) | 2.11 (-0.16; 4.39) | 0.41 (-0.54; 1.35) |
| Role emotional | -0.15 (-1.64; 1.34) | 3.05 (-1.06; 7.16) | 0.19 (-1.15; 1.53) |
| Mental health | 0.13 (-0.60; 0.87) | 2.09 (0.57; 3.61)** | 0.29 (-0.37; 0.95) |
| Rotterdam handicap scale score | Pre-ERT | During ERT | |
| -0.49 (-0.64;-0.34)** | -0.02 (-0.17; 0.13) | ||
Data shown are mean changes in score points per year (sp/y) as calculated by univariate analysis using mixed model ANOVA
CI confidence interval
*Change is significant at the 0.05 level, **Change is significant at the 0.01 level
Fig. 2Expected SF-36 quality of life scores before, at start and during ERT. The figure displays the expected mean scores 4 years before starting ERT, at start of ERT and after 4 years of ERT as calculated using the results from the statistical model presented in Table 2