Literature DB >> 26530994

Why do males choose heterospecific females in the red spider mite?

Yukie Sato1,2, Heike Staudacher3, Maurice W Sabelis3.   

Abstract

In some species, males readily show courtship behaviour towards heterospecific females and even prefer them to females of their own species. This behaviour is generally explained by indiscriminate mating to acquire more mates, but may partly be explained by male mate preference mechanisms that have developed to choose among conspecific females, as male preference for larger females causes mating with larger heterospecific females. Recently, we found that males of the red spider mite, Tetranychus evansi collected from Spain (invasive population), prefer to mate with females of the two-spotted spider mite, T. urticae rather than with conspecific females. In spider mites, mate preference for non-kin individuals has been observed. Here, we investigated if T. evansi males collected from the area of its origin (Brazil) also show preference for heterospecific females. Secondly, we investigated if mate preference of T. evansi males for heterospecific females is affected by their relatedness to conspecific females which are offered together with heterospecific females. We found that mate preference for heterospecific females exists in Brazilian T. evansi, suggesting that the preference for heterospecific females is not a lack of evolved premating isolation with an allopatric species. We found that T. evansi males showed lower propensity to mate with heterospecific females when alternative females were non-kin in the two iso-female lines collected from Brazil. However, the effect of relatedness on male mate preference was not significant. We discuss alternative hypotheses explaining why T. evansi males prefer to mate with T. urticae females.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heterospecific mating; Inbreeding avoidance; Invasive species; Male mate choice; Reproductive interference

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26530994     DOI: 10.1007/s10493-015-9985-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol        ISSN: 0168-8162            Impact factor:   2.132


  22 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.

Authors:  R Bonduriansky
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2001-08

2.  Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice.

Authors:  Genevieve M Kozak; Melissa Reisland; Janette W Boughmann
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  The (mis)concept of species recognition.

Authors:  Tamra C Mendelson; Kerry L Shaw
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 4.  Reproductive interference between animal species.

Authors:  Julia Gröning; Axel Hochkirch
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.875

5.  Inbreeding depression and purging in a haplodiploid: gender-related effects.

Authors:  N S H Tien; M W Sabelis; M Egas
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Density and genetic relatedness increase dispersal distance in a subsocial organism.

Authors:  E V Bitume; D Bonte; O Ronce; F Bach; E Flaven; I Olivieri; C M Nieberding
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  Is only the first mating effective for females in the Kanzawa spider mite, Tetranychus kanzawai (Acari: Tetranychidae)?

Authors:  Keiko Oku
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 2.132

8.  Do Tetranychus urticae males avoid mating with familiar females?

Authors:  T Yoshioka; S Yano
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Species-wide homogeneity of nuclear ribosomal ITS2 sequences in the spider mite Tetranychus urticae contrasts with extensive mitochondrial COI polymorphism.

Authors:  M Navajas; J Lagnel; J Gutierrez; P Boursot
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Test of colonisation scenarios reveals complex invasion history of the red tomato spider mite Tetranychus evansi.

Authors:  Angham Boubou; Alain Migeon; George K Roderick; Philippe Auger; Jean-Marie Cornuet; Sara Magalhães; Maria Navajas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Independent Effects of a Herbivore's Bacterial Symbionts on Its Performance and Induced Plant Defences.

Authors:  Heike Staudacher; Bernardus C J Schimmel; Mart M Lamers; Nicky Wybouw; Astrid T Groot; Merijn R Kant
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Overcompensation of herbivore reproduction through hyper-suppression of plant defenses in response to competition.

Authors:  Bernardus C J Schimmel; Livia M S Ataide; Rachid Chafi; Carlos A Villarroel; Juan M Alba; Robert C Schuurink; Merijn R Kant
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 10.151

3.  The role of web sharing, species recognition and host-plant defence in interspecific competition between two herbivorous mite species.

Authors:  Yukie Sato; Juan M Alba; Martijn Egas; Maurice W Sabelis
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 2.132

Review 4.  Why Do Herbivorous Mites Suppress Plant Defenses?

Authors:  C Joséphine H Blaazer; Ernesto A Villacis-Perez; Rachid Chafi; Thomas Van Leeuwen; Merijn R Kant; Bernardus C J Schimmel
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Tetranychus evansi spider mite populations suppress tomato defenses to varying degrees.

Authors:  Bram Knegt; Tomas T Meijer; Merijn R Kant; E Toby Kiers; Martijn Egas
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-04-12       Impact factor: 2.912

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.