Literature DB >> 18792662

Reproductive interference between animal species.

Julia Gröning1, Axel Hochkirch.   

Abstract

Although sexual interactions between species (reproductive interference) have been reported from a wide range of animal taxa, their potential for determining species coexistence is often disregarded. Here, we review evidence from laboratory and field studies illustrating that heterospecific sexual interactions are frequently associated with fitness loss and can have severe ecological and evolutionary consequences. We define reproductive interference as any kind of interspecific interaction during the process of mate acquisition that adversely affects the fitness of at least one of the species involved and that is caused by incomplete species recognition. We distinguish seven types of reproductive interference: signal jamming, heterospecific rivalry, misdirected courtship, heterospecific mating attempts, erroneous female choice, heterospecific mating, and hybridization. We then discuss the sex-specific costs of these types and highlight two typical features of reproductive interference: density-dependence and asymmetry. Similar to competition, reproductive interference can lead to displacement of one species (sexual exclusion), spatial, temporal, or habitat segregation, changes in life history parameters, and reproductive character displacement. In many cases, patterns of coexistence might be shaped by reproductive interference rather than by resource competition, as the presence of a few heterospecifics might substantially decrease reproductive success. Therefore, interspecific sexual interactions should receive more attention in ecological research. Reproductive interference has mainly been discussed in the context of invasive species or hybrid zones, whereas its influence on naturally-occurring sympatric species pairs has rarely been addressed. To improve our knowledge of the ecological significance of reproductive interference, findings from laboratory experiments should be validated in the field. Future studies should also focus on ecological mechanisms, such as temporal spatial, or habitat partitioning, that might enable sexually interacting species to coexist. Reproductive interference also has implications for the management of endangered species, which can be threatened by sexual interactions with invasive or common species. Studies of reproductive interference might even provide new insights for biological pest control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18792662     DOI: 10.1086/590510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q Rev Biol        ISSN: 0033-5770            Impact factor:   4.875


  96 in total

1.  Interspecific assistance: fiddler crabs help heterospecific neighbours in territory defence.

Authors:  Isobel Booksmythe; Michael D Jennions; Patricia R Y Backwell
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Eulemur, me lemur: the evolution of scent-signal complexity in a primate clade.

Authors:  Javier delBarco-Trillo; Caitlin R Sacha; George R Dubay; Christine M Drea
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Character displacement from the receiver's perspective: species and mate recognition despite convergent signals in suboscine birds.

Authors:  Nathalie Seddon; Joseph A Tobias
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Fatal attraction: sexually cannibalistic invaders attract naive native mantids.

Authors:  Murray P Fea; Margaret C Stanley; Gregory I Holwell
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Competitive reduction by satyrization? Evidence for interspecific mating in nature and asymmetric reproductive competition between invasive mosquito vectors.

Authors:  Frederic Tripet; L Philip Lounibos; Dannielle Robbins; Jenny Moran; Naoya Nishimura; Erik M Blosser
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.345

6.  Character displacement and the origins of diversity.

Authors:  David W Pfennig; Karin S Pfennig
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Interactions with heterospecific males do not affect how female Mesocricetus hamsters respond to conspecific males.

Authors:  Javier Delbarco-Trillo; Robert E Johnston
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Interspecific aggression, not interspecific mating, drives character displacement in the wing coloration of male rubyspot damselflies (Hetaerina).

Authors:  J P Drury; G F Grether
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Satyrization without evidence of successful insemination from interspecific mating between invasive mosquitoes.

Authors:  María C Carrasquilla; L Philip Lounibos
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Reproductive interference and fecundity affect competitive interactions of sibling species with low mating barriers: experimental and theoretical evidence.

Authors:  M Gebiola; S E Kelly; L Velten; R Zug; P Hammerstein; M Giorgini; M S Hunter
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.821

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.