| Literature DB >> 26530991 |
Ewa K Puchalska1, Marcin Kozak2.
Abstract
Typhlodromus pyri Scheuten and Euseius finlandicus (Oudemans) are important predators of phytophagous mites. The present laboratory study aimed to determine whether both species can develop and reach maturity feeding on spider mites occurring on willows, i.e., Schizotetranychus schizopus (Zacher), Schizotetranychus garmani Pritchard & Baker, and Tetranychus urticae Koch, and on Brassica napus L. pollen. The predators' development, reproduction and demographic parameters were significantly affected by diet. The data suggest that rape pollen can be useful in mass rearing of E. finlandicus but is completely unsuitable as alternative food for T. pyri. Short development time and high values of population parameters achieved by T. pyri feeding on larvae and protonymphs of S. schizopus and by E. finlandicus feeding on juvenile stages of S. garmani indicate great suitability of these preys as food for the phytoseiids, and make both predatory species promising biocontrol agents in spider mite control on willows.Entities:
Keywords: Alternative food; Biological control; Development; Life table; Pollen; Predator
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26530991 PMCID: PMC4679109 DOI: 10.1007/s10493-015-9973-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Appl Acarol ISSN: 0168-8162 Impact factor: 2.132
Mean (±SE) duration (days) of developmental stages and mortality (%) of Typhlodromus pyri and Euseius finlandicus on a diet of Tetranychus urticae, Schizotetranychus schizopus, S. garmani or rape pollen
| Predator species |
| Egg | Larva | Protonymph | Deutonymph | Egg to adult | Immature mortality (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 2.7 ± 0.13 cd | 0.9 ± 0.06 d | 3.1 ± 0.11 d | 3.2 ± 0.16 d | 9.9 ± 0.25 c | 11.1 |
|
| 2.1 ± 0.14 ab | 2.1 ± 0.07 a | 1.7 ± 0.10 ab | 2.2 ± 0.08 ab | 8.1 ± 0.18 a | 7.4 | |
|
| 2.0 ± 0.15 a | 1.8 ± 0.081 b | 1.6 ± 0.09 a | 2.2 ± 0.08 ab | 7.6 ± 0.14 a | 6.7 | |
| Rape pollen | 2.6 ± 0.11 ce | 1.5 ± 0.10 c | 1.8 ± 0.10 ab | 2.1 ± 0.10 a | 7.9 ± 0.13 a | 3.7 | |
|
|
| 2.4 ± 0.12 bc | 0.9 ± 0.13 d | 2.9 ± 0.08 cd | 2.5 ± 0.10 b | 8.7 ± 0.22 b | 7.1 |
|
| 2.2 ± 0.11 ab | 0.7 ± 0.11 d | 2.6 ± 0.11 c | 2.45 ± 0.16 b | 7.9 ± 0.25 a | 10.7 | |
|
| 2.2 ± 0.12 abe | 0.8 ± 0.10 d | 2.8 ± 0.09 c | 2.9 ± 0.10 c | 8.7 ± 0.16 b | 6.9 | |
| Rape pollen | 3.1 ± 0.15 d | 0.9 ± 0.05 d | 4.5 ± 0.1 e | 4.4 ± 0.17 e | 12.9 ± 0.23 d | 30.6 | |
| Two-way ANOVA ( | Predator species | 0.005 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Diet | <0.001 | 0.024 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| Predator species * diet | 0.54 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Means within a column followed by different letters are significantly different (two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons: P < 0.05)
Mean (±SE) longevity, reproduction and sex ratio of progeny of Typhlodromus pyri and Euseius finlandicus females on a diet of Tetranychus urticae, Schizotetranychus schizopus, S. garmani or rape pollen
| Predator species | Diet | Pre-oviposition (days) | Oviposition (days) | Post-oviposition (days) | Female longevity (days) | Total eggs per female | Eggs per female per day | Sex ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 3.1 ± 0.22 c | 19.0 ± 1.54 b | 2.1 ± 0.27 a | 23.7 ± 1.41 a | 12.2 ± 0.92 b | 0.64 ± 0.05 a | 0.75 |
|
| 3.1 ± 0.16 c | 23.1 ± 0.27 b | 2.0 ± 0.23 a | 28.3 ± 0.80 b | 16.5 ± 0.19 c | 0.72 ± 0.02 ab | 0.65 | |
|
| 2.0 ± 0.51 a | 22.8 ± 1.27 b | 2.6 ± 0.33 a | 27.4 ± 1.22 b | 21.1 ± 1.08 d | 0.90 ± 0.07 cd | 0.79 | |
| Rape pollen | 3.0 ± 0.21 bc | 22.4 ± 0.87 b | 2.5 ± 0.29 a | 27.9 ± 0.65 b | 22.3 ± 0.8 d | 1.00 ± 0.05 d | 0.73 | |
|
|
| 2.9 ± 0.18 bc | 23.6 ± 1.21 b | 9.1 ± 1.06 b | 35.6 ± 1.80 c | 19.9 ± 0.93 d | 0.80 ± 0.09 bc | 0.62 |
|
| 2.5 +0.23 ab | 20.9 ± 0.91 b | 15.5 ± 1.17 c | 38.8 ± 0.85 c | 29.1 ± 0.95 e | 1.28 ± 0.11 e | 0.63 | |
|
| 2.7 ± 0.22 bc | 28.5 ± 1.49 c | 9.3 ± 1.47 b | 40.6 ± 0.95 c | 27.5 ± 0.85 e | 0.88 ± 0.07 cd | 0.77 | |
| Rape pollen | 4.4 ± 0.19 d | 8.1 ± 0.35 a | 9.2 ± 1.17 b | 21.7 ± 1.16 a | 5.9 ± 0.36 a | 0.74 ± 0.04 abc | 0.70 | |
| Two-way ANOVA ( | Predator species | 0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Diet | 0.023 | 0.086 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| Predator species * diet | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Means within a column followed by different letters are significantly different (generalized linear models, with Poisson distribution of the residuals followed by pair-wise comparisons for combinations of the factors: P < 0.05)
Mean (±SE) life table parameters of Typhlodromus pyri and Euseius finlandicus females on a diet of Tetranychus urticae, Schizotetranychus schizopus, S. garmani and rape pollen
| Predator species | Diet |
| T | rm |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 8.1 ± 0.61 b | 23.1 ± 0.74 c | 0.090 ± 0.0022 b | 1.09 ± 0.0024 b |
|
| 10.0 ± 0.37 c | 22.0 ± 0.45 bc | 0.105 ± 0.0013 c | 1.11 ± 0.0015 c | |
|
| 15.5 ± 0.80 e | 20.8 ± 0.45 ab | 0.132 ± 0.0013 f | 1.14 ± 0.0015 f | |
| Rape pollen | 15.7 ± 0.56 e | 22.2 ± 0.40 c | 0.124 ± 0.0016 e | 1.13 ± 0.0018 e | |
|
|
| 11.5 ± 0.55 d | 22.2 ± 0.11 c | 0.110 ± 0.0017 d | 1.12 ± 0.0019 d |
|
| 15.3 ± 1.20 e | 20.0 ± 0.20 a | 0.136 ± 0.0037 f | 1.15 ± 0.0043 f | |
|
| 19.7 ± 0.61 f | 25.5 ± 0.71 d | 0.117 ± 0.0030 d | 1.12 ± 0.0034 d | |
| Rape pollen | 2.9 ± 0.18 a | 21.1 ± 0.25 b | 0.050 ± 0.0027 a | 1.05 ± 0.0028 a |
Means within a column followed by different letters are significantly different (Jackknife method: P < 0.05)