Literature DB >> 22836719

Effects of potential food sources on biological and demographic parameters of the predatory mites Kampimodromus aberrans, Typhlodromus pyri and Amblyseius andersoni.

Mauro Lorenzon1, Alberto Pozzebon, Carlo Duso.   

Abstract

Kampimodromus aberrans, Typhlodromus pyri and Amblyseius andersoni are generalist predatory mites important in controlling tetranychid and eriophyoid mites in European vineyards. They can persist by exploiting various non-prey foods when their main prey is absent or scarce. A comparative analysis of the effects of various prey and non-prey foods on the life history of these predators is lacking. In the laboratory, predatory mites were reared on herbivorous mites (Panonychus ulmi, Eotetranychus carpini and Colomerus vitis), a potential alternative prey (Tydeus caudatus) and two non-prey foods, i.e. the pollen of Typha latifolia and the mycelium of Grape downy mildew (GDM) Plasmopara viticola. Developmental times, survival, sex ratio and fecundity as well as life table parameters were estimated. Kampimodromus aberrans developed faster on E. carpini, C. vitis or pollen than on P. ulmi and laid more eggs on pollen than on prey. Low numbers of this predator developed on GDM infected leaves. Tydeus caudatus was not suitable as prey for any of the three predatory mites. Kampimodromus aberrans showed the highest intrinsic rate of population increase when fed on pollen. Developmental times of T. pyri on prey or pollen were similar but fecundity was higher on pollen than on P. ulmi. Typhlodromus pyri had higher intrinsic rates of population increase on C. vitis and pollen than on P. ulmi; E. carpini showed intermediate values whereas GDM resulted in the lowest r ( m ) values. Development of A. andersoni females was faster on pollen and C. vitis than on P. ulmi and GDM. Fecundity was higher on pollen and mites compared to GDM. Life table parameters of A. andersoni did not differ when predators were fed with prey or pollen while GDM led to a lower r ( m ) value. On a specific diet A. andersoni exhibited faster development and higher fecundity than T. pyri and K. aberrans. These findings improve knowledge on factors affecting the potential of predatory mites in controlling phytophagous mites in European vineyards.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22836719     DOI: 10.1007/s10493-012-9580-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol        ISSN: 0168-8162            Impact factor:   2.132


  16 in total

1.  Pollen availability for predaceous mites on apple: spatial and temporal heterogeneity.

Authors:  J A Addison; J M Hardman; S J Walde
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.132

2.  Statistical inference on associated fertility life table parameters using jackknife technique: computational aspects.

Authors:  A de H Maia; A J Luiz; C Campanhola
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Life-styles of Phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control.

Authors:  J A McMurtry; B A Croft
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 19.686

4.  Biological control through provision of additional food to predators: a theoretical study.

Authors:  P D N Srinivasu; B S R V Prasad; M Venkatesulu
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 1.570

5.  The effects of fungicides on non-target mites can be mediated by plant pathogens.

Authors:  Alberto Pozzebon; Michele Borgo; Carlo Duso
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 7.086

6.  Eriophyoid mite damage in Vitis vinifera (grapevine) in Australia: Calepitrimerus vitis and Colomerus vitis (Acari: Eriophyidae) as the common cause of the widespread 'Restricted Spring Growth' syndrome.

Authors:  Martina B Bernard; Paul A Horne; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.132

7.  Cannibalism and intraguild predation among phytoseiid mites: are aggressiveness and prey preference related to diet specialization?

Authors:  P Schausberger; B A Croft
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.132

8.  Phytoseiid predators as potential biological control agents for Bemisia tabaci.

Authors:  M Nomikou; A Janssen; R Schraag; M W Sabelis
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.132

9.  Leaf pubescence and two-spotted spider mite webbing influence phytoseiid behavior and population density.

Authors:  A Roda; J Nyrop; G English-Loeb; M Dicke
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2001-08-10       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Carotenoids function in photoperiodic induction of diapause in a predacious mite.

Authors:  A Q VAN Zon; W P Overmeer; A Veerman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-09-04       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  8 in total

1.  Dietary effects on body weight of predatory mites (Acari, Phytoseiidae).

Authors:  Irina Goleva; Esteban C Rubio Cadena; Nar B Ranabhat; Caroline Beckereit; Claus P W Zebitz
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 2.132

2.  Predation on heterospecific larvae by adult females of Kampimodromus aberrans, Amblyseius andersoni, Typhlodromus pyri and Phytoseius finitimus (Acari: Phytoseiidae).

Authors:  Shakeel Ahmad; Alberto Pozzebon; Carlo Duso
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.132

3.  Food source affects the expression of vitellogenin and fecundity of a biological control agent, Neoseiulus cucumeris.

Authors:  Yunlong Zhao; Dunsong Li; Min Zhang; Wei Chen; Guren Zhang
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.132

4.  Potential of the predatory mite Phytoseius finitimus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) to feed and reproduce on greenhouse pests.

Authors:  Maria L Pappas; Christos Xanthis; Konstantinos Samaras; Dimitris S Koveos; George D Broufas
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 2.132

5.  A Fundamental Step in IPM on Grapevine: Evaluating the Side Effects of Pesticides on Predatory Mites.

Authors:  Alberto Pozzebon; Paola Tirello; Renzo Moret; Marco Pederiva; Carlo Duso
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 2.769

6.  Can Flowering Greencover Crops Promote Biological Control in German Vineyards?

Authors:  Christoph Hoffmann; Janine Köckerling; Sandra Biancu; Thomas Gramm; Gertraud Michl; Martin H Entling
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 2.769

7.  Airborne pollen can affect the abundance of predatory mites in vineyards: implications for conservation biological control strategies.

Authors:  Valeria Malagnini; Alberto Pozzebon; Paolo Facchin; Arturo Paganelli; Carlo Duso
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 4.462

8.  Typhlodromus pyri and Euseius finlandicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) as potential biocontrol agents against spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) inhabiting willows: laboratory studies on predator development and reproduction on four diets.

Authors:  Ewa K Puchalska; Marcin Kozak
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.132

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.