Kathleen A Ashcraft1, Mary-Keara Boss2, Artak Tovmasyan1, Kingshuk Roy Choudhury3, Andrew N Fontanella4, Kenneth H Young1, Gregory M Palmer1, Samuel R Birer1, Chelsea D Landon1, Won Park1, Shiva K Das5, Tin Weitner1, Huaxin Sheng6, David S Warner6, David M Brizel7, Ivan Spasojevic8, Ines Batinic-Haberle1, Mark W Dewhirst9. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 2. Department of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, North Carolina State College of Veterinary Medicine, Raleigh, North Carolina. 3. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. 4. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. 5. Physics and Computing Division, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 6. Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 7. Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 8. Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 9. Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: mark.dewhirst@duke.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To test the effects of a novel Mn porphyrin oxidative stress modifier, Mn(III) meso-tetrakis(N-n-butoxyethylpyridinium-2-yl)porphyrin (MnBuOE), for its radioprotective and radiosensitizing properties in normal tissue versus tumor, respectively. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Murine oral mucosa and salivary glands were treated with a range of radiation doses with or without MnBuOE to establish the dose-effect curves for mucositis and xerostomia. Radiation injury was quantified by intravital near-infrared imaging of cathepsin activity, assessment of salivation, and histologic analysis. To evaluate effects of MnBuOE on the tumor radiation response, we administered the drug as an adjuvant to fractionated radiation of FaDu xenografts. Again, a range of radiation therapy (RT) doses was administered to establish the radiation dose-effect curve. The 50% tumor control dose values with or without MnBuOE and dose-modifying factor were determined. RESULTS: MnBuOE protected normal tissue by reducing RT-mediated mucositis, xerostomia, and fibrosis. The dose-modifying factor for protection against xerostomia was 0.77. In contrast, MnBuOE increased tumor local control rates compared with controls. The dose-modifying factor, based on the ratio of 50% tumor control dose values, was 1.3. Immunohistochemistry showed that MnBuOE-treated tumors exhibited a significant influx of M1 tumor-associated macrophages, which provides mechanistic insight into its radiosensitizing effects in tumors. CONCLUSIONS: MnBuOE widens the therapeutic margin by decreasing the dose of radiation required to control tumor, while increasing normal tissue resistance to RT-mediated injury. This is the first study to quantitatively demonstrate the magnitude of a single drug's ability to radioprotect normal tissue while radiosensitizing tumor.
PURPOSE: To test the effects of a novel Mn porphyrin oxidative stress modifier, Mn(III) meso-tetrakis(N-n-butoxyethylpyridinium-2-yl)porphyrin (MnBuOE), for its radioprotective and radiosensitizing properties in normal tissue versus tumor, respectively. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Murine oral mucosa and salivary glands were treated with a range of radiation doses with or without MnBuOE to establish the dose-effect curves for mucositis and xerostomia. Radiation injury was quantified by intravital near-infrared imaging of cathepsin activity, assessment of salivation, and histologic analysis. To evaluate effects of MnBuOE on the tumor radiation response, we administered the drug as an adjuvant to fractionated radiation of FaDu xenografts. Again, a range of radiation therapy (RT) doses was administered to establish the radiation dose-effect curve. The 50% tumor control dose values with or without MnBuOE and dose-modifying factor were determined. RESULTS: MnBuOE protected normal tissue by reducing RT-mediated mucositis, xerostomia, and fibrosis. The dose-modifying factor for protection against xerostomia was 0.77. In contrast, MnBuOE increased tumor local control rates compared with controls. The dose-modifying factor, based on the ratio of 50% tumor control dose values, was 1.3. Immunohistochemistry showed that MnBuOE-treated tumors exhibited a significant influx of M1 tumor-associated macrophages, which provides mechanistic insight into its radiosensitizing effects in tumors. CONCLUSIONS: MnBuOE widens the therapeutic margin by decreasing the dose of radiation required to control tumor, while increasing normal tissue resistance to RT-mediated injury. This is the first study to quantitatively demonstrate the magnitude of a single drug's ability to radioprotect normal tissue while radiosensitizing tumor.
Authors: S T Sonis; G Oster; H Fuchs; L Bellm; W Z Bradford; J Edelsberg; V Hayden; J Eilers; J B Epstein; F G LeVeque; C Miller; D E Peterson; M M Schubert; F K Spijkervet; M Horowitz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-04-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Zrinka Rajic; Artak Tovmasyan; Ivan Spasojevic; Huaxin Sheng; Miaomiao Lu; Alice M Li; Edith B Gralla; David S Warner; Ludmil Benov; Ines Batinic-Haberle Journal: Free Radic Biol Med Date: 2012-02-13 Impact factor: 7.376
Authors: Oscar R Colegio; Ngoc-Quynh Chu; Alison L Szabo; Thach Chu; Anne Marie Rhebergen; Vikram Jairam; Nika Cyrus; Carolyn E Brokowski; Stephanie C Eisenbarth; Gillian M Phillips; Gary W Cline; Andrew J Phillips; Ruslan Medzhitov Journal: Nature Date: 2014-07-13 Impact factor: 69.504
Authors: Rebecca E Oberley-Deegan; Joshua J Steffan; Kyle O Rove; Kathryn M Pate; Michael W Weaver; Ivan Spasojevic; Barbara Frederick; David Raben; Randall B Meacham; James D Crapo; Hari K Koul Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-09-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kranti A Mapuskar; Carryn M Anderson; Douglas R Spitz; Ines Batinic-Haberle; Bryan G Allen; Rebecca E Oberley-Deegan Journal: Semin Radiat Oncol Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 5.934
Authors: Xiaofei Chen; Jade Mims; Xiumei Huang; Naveen Singh; Edward Motea; Sarah M Planchon; Muhammad Beg; Allen W Tsang; Mercedes Porosnicu; Melissa L Kemp; David A Boothman; Cristina M Furdui Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2017-12-20 Impact factor: 8.401
Authors: Zrinka Rajic; Artak Tovmasyan; Otávio L de Santana; Isabelle N Peixoto; Ivan Spasojevic; Silmar A do Monte; Elizete Ventura; Júlio S Rebouças; Ines Batinic-Haberle Journal: J Inorg Biochem Date: 2017-01-05 Impact factor: 4.155
Authors: J Bowen; N Al-Dasooqi; P Bossi; H Wardill; Y Van Sebille; A Al-Azri; E Bateman; M E Correa; J Raber-Durlacher; A Kandwal; B Mayo; R G Nair; A Stringer; K Ten Bohmer; D Thorpe; R V Lalla; S Sonis; K Cheng; S Elad Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-07-08 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Ilia A Toshkov; Anatoli S Gleiberman; Vadim L Mett; Alan D Hutson; Anurag K Singh; Andrei V Gudkov; Lyudmila G Burdelya Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2017-03-21 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: Samuel R Birer; Chen-Ting Lee; Kingshuk Roy Choudhury; Kenneth H Young; Ivan Spasojevic; Ines Batinic-Haberle; James D Crapo; Mark W Dewhirst; Kathleen A Ashcraft Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2017-05-18 Impact factor: 2.841