Literature DB >> 26530655

The cement spacer with multiple indentations: increasing antibiotic elution using a cement spacer 'teabag'.

S Salih1, A Paskins2, T Nichol2, T Smith2, A Hamer1.   

Abstract

We investigated whether the indentation of bone cement spacers used in revision of infected joint arthroplasty with a MacDonald dissector increased the elution of antibiotic in vitro. A total of 24 cement discs containing either 0.17 g (0.88% w/w), 0.25 g (1.41% w/w), or 0.33 g (1.75% w/w) gentamicin of constant size were made. Of these, 12 were indented with the dissector. Each disc was immersed in ammonium acetate buffer in a sealed container, and fluid from each container was sampled at zero, one, three, six, 24, 48 and 72 hours and at one, and two weeks. The concentration of gentamicin in the fluid was analysed using high performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. The fluid sampled at 72 hours from the indented discs containing 0.17 g gentamicin (0.88% w/w) contained a mean of 113 mcg/ml (90.12 to 143.5) compared with 44.5 mcg/ml (44.02 to 44.90) in the fluid sampled from the plain discs (p = 0.012). In discs containing 0.33 g gentamicin (1.75% w/w), the concentration eluted from the indented discs at 72 hours was a mean of 316 mcg/ml (223 to 421) compared with a mean of 118 mcg/ml (100 to 140) from the plain discs (p < 0.001). At two weeks, these significant differences persisted. At nine weeks the indented discs eluted a greater concentration for all gentamicin doses, but the difference was only significant for the discs containing 0.17 g (0.88% w/w, p = 0.006). However if the area under the curve is taken as a measure of the total antibiotic eluted, the indented discs eluted more gentamicin than the plain discs for the 0.17 g (0.88% w/w, p = 0.031), the 0.25 g (1.41% w/w, p < 0.001) and the 0.33 g (1.75% w/w, p < 0.001) discs. When preparing antibiotic spacers for use in staged revision arthroplasty surgery we recommend indenting the spacer with a MacDonald dissector to increase the elution of antibiotic. ©2015 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Infection; antibiotic elution; hip revision; knee revision; revision arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26530655     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B11.35618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  4 in total

Review 1.  The Use of Antibiotic Impregnated Cement Spacers in the Treatment of Infected Total Joint Replacement: Challenges and Achievements.

Authors:  Omid Shahpari; Alireza Mousavian; Nafise Elahpour; Michael-Alexander Malahias; Mohammad H Ebrahimzadeh; Ali Moradi
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2020-01

2.  The 'apple core' cement spacer for the management of massive bone loss in two-stage revision knee arthroplasty for infection.

Authors:  Nima Razii; Rahul Kakar; Rhidian Morgan-Jones
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-05-11

3.  Inhibitory effects of vancomycin and fosfomycin on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from antibiotic-impregnated articulating cement spacers.

Authors:  V Yuenyongviwat; N Ingviya; P Pathaburee; B Tangtrakulwanich
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.853

4.  Antibiotics release from cement spacers used for two-stage treatment of implant-associated infections after total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Annett Klinder; Sarah Zaatreh; Martin Ellenrieder; Sylvio Redanz; Andreas Podbielski; Tobias Reichel; Hans Bösebeck; Wolfram Mittelmeier; Rainer Bader
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.368

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.