Literature DB >> 26530406

Direct-to-PCR tissue preservation for DNA profiling.

Amy Sorensen1, Clare Berry1, David Bruce1, Michelle Elizabeth Gahan1, Sheree Hughes-Stamm1, Dennis McNevin2.   

Abstract

Disaster victim identification (DVI) often occurs in remote locations with extremes of temperatures and humidities. Access to mortuary facilities and refrigeration are not always available. An effective and robust DNA sampling and preservation procedure would increase the probability of successful DNA profiling and allow faster repatriation of bodies and body parts. If the act of tissue preservation also released DNA into solution, ready for polymerase chain reaction (PCR), the DVI process could be further streamlined. In this study, we explored the possibility of obtaining DNA profiles without DNA extraction, by adding aliquots of preservative solutions surrounding fresh human muscle and decomposing human muscle and skin tissue samples directly to PCR. The preservatives consisted of two custom preparations and two proprietary solutions. The custom preparations were a salt-saturated solution of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) with ethylenediaminetetraacetic (EDTA) and TENT buffer (Tris, EDTA, NaCl, Tween 20). The proprietary preservatives were DNAgard (Biomatrica(®)) and Tissue Stabilising Kit (DNA Genotek). We obtained full PowerPlex(®) 21 (Promega) and GlobalFiler(®) (Life Technologies) DNA profiles from fresh and decomposed tissue preserved at 35 °C for up to 28 days for all four preservatives. The preservative aliquots removed from the fresh muscle tissue samples had been stored at -80 °C for 4 years, indicating that long-term archival does not diminish the probability of successful DNA typing. Rather, storage at -80 °C seems to reduce PCR inhibition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA profile; Direct PCR; Disaster victim identification (DVI); Mass disaster; PCR inhibition; Tissue preservation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26530406     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-015-1286-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  27 in total

1.  Evaluation of non-formalin tissue fixation for molecular profiling studies.

Authors:  John W Gillespie; Carolyn J M Best; Verena E Bichsel; Kristina A Cole; Susan F Greenhut; Stephen M Hewitt; Mamoun Ahram; Yvonne B Gathright; Maria J Merino; Robert L Strausberg; Jonathan I Epstein; Stanley R Hamilton; Gallya Gannot; Galina V Baibakova; Valerie S Calvert; Michael J Flaig; Rodrigo F Chuaqui; Judi C Herring; John Pfeifer; Emmanuel F Petricoin; W Marston Linehan; Paul H Duray; G Steven Bova; Michael R Emmert-Buck
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 2.  Effect of fixatives and tissue processing on the content and integrity of nucleic acids.

Authors:  Mythily Srinivasan; Daniel Sedmak; Scott Jewell
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  DNA extraction from archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections based on the antigen retrieval principle: heating under the influence of pH.

Authors:  Shan-Rong Shi; Richard J Cote; Lin Wu; Cheng Liu; Ram Datar; Yan Shi; Dongxin Liu; Hyoeun Lim; Clive R Taylor
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.479

4.  Direct PCR from whole blood, without DNA extraction.

Authors:  B Mercier; C Gaucher; O Feugeas; C Mazurier
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-10-11       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Evaluation and comparative analysis of direct amplification of STRs using PowerPlex® 18D and Identifiler® Direct systems.

Authors:  Blake A Myers; Jonathan L King; Bruce Budowle
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.882

Review 6.  DNA analysis in Disaster Victim Identification.

Authors:  Kerstin Montelius; Bertil Lindblom
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.007

7.  [Elimination of PCR inhibitors in routine diagnostic real-time PCR assay and results of internal amplification control].

Authors:  Murat Sayan; Meliha Meriç; Suna Celebi; Ayşe Willke
Journal:  Mikrobiyol Bul       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 0.622

8.  Generation of DNA profiles from fabrics without DNA extraction.

Authors:  Adrian Linacre; Vera Pekarek; Yuvaneswari Chandramoulee Swaran; Shanan S Tobe
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 4.882

9.  Human tissue preservation for disaster victim identification (DVI) in tropical climates.

Authors:  A Allen-Hall; D McNevin
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 4.882

10.  Inhibition of PCR in genital and urine specimens submitted for Chlamydia trachomatis testing.

Authors:  B Toye; W Woods; M Bobrowska; K Ramotar
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  3 in total

1.  The QIAGEN 140-locus single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel for forensic identification using massively parallel sequencing (MPS): an evaluation and a direct-to-PCR trial.

Authors:  I Avent; A G Kinnane; N Jones; I Petermann; R Daniel; M E Gahan; D McNevin
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Evaluation of four commercial quantitative real-time PCR kits with inhibited and degraded samples.

Authors:  Amy S Holmes; Rachel Houston; Kyleen Elwick; David Gangitano; Sheree Hughes-Stamm
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Direct PCR amplification from saliva sample using non-direct multiplex STR kits for forensic DNA typing.

Authors:  Pankaj Shrivastava; Toshi Jain; R K Kumawat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.