| Literature DB >> 26530403 |
Renato Santos Laboissiere1, Marcelo Araújo Buzelin2, Débora Balabram3, Marina De Brot4, Cristiana Buzelin Nunes5, Rafael Malagoli Rocha6, Mônica Maria Demas Álvares Cabral7, Helenice Gobbi8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer is usually diagnosed in an advanced stage of disease and treatment options are sparse. Trastuzumab was recently approved for metastatic or locally advanced carcinomas arising in the stomach or in the gastroesophageal junction in patients with HER2-positive tumors. However, data on the frequency of HER2-positive cases among Brazilian patients are limited. Our aim was to characterize HER2 protein and gene status in a series of Brazilian patients with gastric cancer and to evaluate its association with clinicopathological data.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26530403 PMCID: PMC4632681 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-015-0384-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Gastroenterol ISSN: 1471-230X Impact factor: 3.067
Association between HER2 status and clinicopathological parameters
| Overall | HER2 positive | HER2 negative |
| HER2 (3+) | HER2 (2+) | HER2 (0, 1+) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 13(10.5) | 111 (89.5) | 13(10.5) | 10 (8.1) | 101(81.4) | |||
|
| 0.803 | 0.590 | ||||||
| ≥60 years | 82 (66.1) | 9 | 73 | 9 | 8 | 65 | ||
| <60 years | 42 (33.9) | 4 | 38 | 4 | 2 | 36 | ||
|
| 0.865 | 0.459 | ||||||
| Male | 64 (51.6) | 7 | 57 | 7 | 7 | 50 | ||
| Female | 60 (48.4) | 6 | 54 | 6 | 3 | 51 | ||
|
| 0.720 | 0.709 | ||||||
| Distal stomach | 100(80.6) | 10 | 90 | 10 | 9 | 81 | ||
| Proximal stomach/GEJ | 24 (19.4) | 3 | 21 | 3 | 1 | 20 | ||
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Intestinal | 61 (49.2) | 11 | 50 | 11 | 9 | 41 | ||
| Diffuse | 21 (16.9) | 0 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 21 | ||
| Mixed | 33 (26.6) | 2 | 31 | 2 | 1 | 30 | ||
| Unditermined | 9 (7.3) | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 9 | ||
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Well | 13 (10.5) | 4 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 8 | ||
| Moderately | 45 (36.3) | 7 | 38 | 7 | 8 | 30 | ||
| Poorly | 66 (53.2) | 2 | 64 | 2 | 1 | 63 | ||
|
|
| 0.060 | ||||||
| Positive | 94 (75.8) | 13 | 81 | 13 | 6 | 75 | ||
| Negative | 30 (24.2) | 0 | 30 | 0 | 4 | 26 | ||
|
| 0.395 | 0.170 | ||||||
| Positive | 44 (35.5) | 6 | 38 | 6 | 1 | 37 | ||
| Negative | 80 (64.5) | 7 | 73 | 7 | 9 | 64 | ||
|
| 0.271 | 0.165 | ||||||
| pT1 | 17 (13.7) | 0 | 17 | 0 | 1 | 16 | ||
| pT2 | 32 (25.8) | 3 | 29 | 3 | 2 | 27 | ||
| pT3 | 69 (55.6) | 10 | 59 | 10 | 5 | 54 | ||
| pT4 | 6 (4.9) | 0 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | ||
|
| 0.453 | 0.762 | ||||||
| pN0 | 39 (31.5) | 2 | 37 | 2 | 4 | 33 | ||
| pN1 | 46 (37.1) | 7 | 39 | 7 | 4 | 35 | ||
| pN2 | 24 (19.3) | 3 | 21 | 3 | 1 | 20 | ||
| pN3 | 15 (12.1) | 1 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 13 | ||
|
| 0.548 | 0.705 | ||||||
| pM0 | 121(97.6) | 13 | 108 | 13 | 10 | 98 | ||
| pM1 | 3 (2.4) | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
Bold numbers represent P values with statistical significance
Fig. 1Immunohistochemical analysis of HER2 expression in gastric carcinomas using the 4B5 antibody in whole-tissue sections. (a) a HER2-positive case (3+); (b) a HER2-equivocal case (2+); (c) a HER2-negative case (1+); (d) intratumoral protein heterogeneity in a HER2-positive case (3+). (A-C: x400 field magnification; D: x200 field magnification)
Fig. 2Possible pitfalls in the immunohistochemical analysis of HER2 protein expression using the 4B5 antibody. Cytoplasmic non specific staining in normal foveolar gastric mucosa (left) and in a focus of gastric high-grade dysplasia (right) (x200 field magnification)
HER2 expression in gastric cancer: analysing studies with patients from different parts of the world
| Study | Year | Patients’ place of origin | Number of patients | HER2 positive rate (%) | Association with clinicopathological features |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bang YJ [ | 2010 | ToGA trial (Multicenter) | 3,665 | 16.6 | Topography (GEJ) |
| Intestinal-type | |||||
| Begnami MD [ | 2011 | Brazil (Single center) | 221 | 8.0 | Intestinal-type |
| Low-grade | |||||
| Cruz-Reyes C [ | 2013 | Mexico (Single center) | 269 | 3.7 | Intestinal-type |
| Cho J [ | 2013 | South Korea (Single center) | 2,798 | 7.3 | Older age |
| Male gender | |||||
| Intestinal-type | |||||
| Upper-third stomach | |||||
| Higher lymph node stage | |||||
| Advanced staging | |||||
| Shan L [ | 2013 | China (Single center) | 1,463 | 9.8 | Topography (GEJ) |
| Intestinal-type | |||||
| Low-grade | |||||
| Matsusaka S [ | 2015 | Japan (Multicenter) | 1,461 | 15.6 | Intestinal-type |
| Hepatic metastasis | |||||
| Absence of peritoneal metastasis | |||||
| Cappellesso R [ | 2015 | Europe (Multicenter) | 1,040 | 11.0 | Intestinal-type |
| Low-grade | |||||
| Laboissiere RS | 2015 | Brazil (Single Center) | 124 | 10.5 | Intestinal-type |
| Low-grade | |||||
| Lymphovascular invasion |
GEJ gastroesophageal junction