Literature DB >> 25800719

HER2 status in gastroesophageal cancer: a tissue microarray study of 1040 cases.

Rocco Cappellesso1, Matteo Fassan1, Esther Hanspeter2, Jan Bornschein3, Emanuele S G d'Amore4, Lucia V Cuorvo5, Guido Mazzoleni2, Mattia Barbareschi5, Marco Pizzi1, Vincenza Guzzardo1, Peter Malfertheiner3, Marjan Micev6, Maria Guido7, Luciano Giacomelli1, Vladislav V Tsukanov8, Vittorina Zagonel9, Donato Nitti10, Massimo Rugge11.   

Abstract

Among patients with gastric cancer (GC) and gastroesophageal cancer (G-EC), HER2 amplification identifies those who may benefit from trastuzumab. HER2 status assessment, however, is influenced by preanalytic, analytic, and postanalytic variables. In a series of 5426 microarray cancer tissue cores obtained from 1040 GC/G-ECs (824 GC, 216 G-EC) and 720 synchronous nodal metastases, we evaluated both the performances of 2 different immunohistochemistry (IHC) protocols and the HER2 status intratumor variability. The prevalence of HER2 amplification and protein overexpression were assessed by chromogenic in situ hybridization and by 2 IHC protocols (CB11 and 4B5). HER2 was amplified in 114 (11%) of 1040 cases; in 6 (5.3%) of 114 cases, gene amplification only involved nodal metastasis. HER2 amplification prevailed in intestinal-type (P = .001) and low-grade (P < .001) tumors, showing no correlation with patients' age/sex, tumor location, stage, and Ming histotype. Overall, 12.5% and 13.7% of cases IHC scored 2+/3+ using the CB11-IHC and the 4B5-IHC protocol, respectively. HER2 amplification was not associated with protein overexpression (score 0/1+) in 11.4% and 6.2% of cases using the CB11-IHC and the 4B5-IHC protocol, respectively. The 4B5-IHC protocol proved more sensitive than CB11-IHC (93.9% versus 88.6%) and just as specific (96.1% versus 96.9%). Tested by chromogenic in situ hybridization, intratumor HER2 status was "substantially" consistent in different tissue cores obtained from the same case (κ = 0.78). Similar results were obtained for HER2 protein expression (CB11-IHC, κ = 0.78, and 4B5-IHC, κ = 0.83). Immunohistochemistry testing, however, fails in identifying about 10% of HER2-amplified cancers, potentially excluding these patients from anti-HER2 therapy.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CISH; Gastric cancer; Gastroesophageal cancer; HER2; Immunohistochemistry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25800719     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2015.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  18 in total

Review 1.  Perspectives of HER2-targeting in gastric and esophageal cancer.

Authors:  James N Gerson; Sam Skariah; Crystal S Denlinger; Igor Astsaturov
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 6.206

Review 2.  HER2 Testing and Clinical Decision Making in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, American Society for Clinical Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Authors:  Angela N Bartley; Mary Kay Washington; Christina B Ventura; Nofisat Ismaila; Carol Colasacco; Al B Benson; Alfredo Carrato; Margaret L Gulley; Dhanpat Jain; Sanjay Kakar; Helen J Mackay; Catherine Streutker; Laura Tang; Megan Troxell; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  C-Met as a Molecular Marker for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Its Association with Clinical Outcome.

Authors:  Ya-Ping Xu; Gang Lin; Xiao-Jiang Sun; Mao-Hui Yan; Gu Zhang; Jin-Lin Hu; Wen-Yong Sun; Jin-Ming Yu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 4.  Biomarker-targeted therapies for advanced-stage gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction cancers: an emerging paradigm.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Nakamura; Akihito Kawazoe; Florian Lordick; Yelena Y Janjigian; Kohei Shitara
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Current molecular biomarkers evaluation in gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: pathologist does matter.

Authors:  Gianluca Businello; Valentina Angerilli; Sara Lonardi; Francesca Bergamo; Michele Valmasoni; Fabio Farinati; Edoardo Savarino; Gaya Spolverato; Matteo Fassan
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-07-14

6.  Deviating HER2 test results in gastric cancer: analysis from the prospective multicenter VARIANZ study.

Authors:  Katharina Kolbe; Ivonne Haffner; Katrin Schierle; Dieter Maier; Birgitta Geier; Birgit Luber; Hendrik Bläker; Christian Wittekind; Florian Lordick
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 4.322

Review 7.  HER2 heterogeneity in gastric/gastroesophageal cancers: From benchside to practice.

Authors:  Federica Grillo; Matteo Fassan; Francesca Sarocchi; Roberto Fiocca; Luca Mastracci
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Comparison of TMA Technique and Routine Whole Slide Analysis in Evaluation of Proliferative Markers Expression in Laryngeal Squamous Cell Cancer.

Authors:  Urszula Ciesielska; Aleksandra Piotrowska; Christopher Kobierzycki; Wojciech Pastuszewski; Marzenna Podhorska-Okolow; Piotr Dziegiel; Katarzyna Nowinska
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

9.  Two updates on oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma from the fifth WHO classification: Alteration of definition and emphasis on HER2 test.

Authors:  Yunzhu Li; Jiayu Li; Jiman Li
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 10.  HER2-targeted therapies - a role beyond breast cancer.

Authors:  Do-Youn Oh; Yung-Jue Bang
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 66.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.