| Literature DB >> 26528358 |
Hayri Kertmen1, Bora Gürer1, Erdal Resit Yilmaz1, Mehmet Ali Kanat2, Ata Türker Arikok3, Berrin Imge Ergüder4, Askin Esen Hasturk5, Julide Ergil6, Zeki Sekerci1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In this study, we tried to determine whether darbepoetin-α would protect the brain from oxidative stress and apoptosis in a rat traumatic brain injury model.Entities:
Keywords: antiapoptosis; antioxidation; darbepoetin-α; methylprednisolone; neuroprotection; rat; traumatic brain injury
Year: 2015 PMID: 26528358 PMCID: PMC4624756 DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2015.54869
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Med Sci ISSN: 1734-1922 Impact factor: 3.318
Figure 1Bar graphs showing the biochemical results of tissue glutathione peroxidase (A), superoxide dismutase (B), nitric oxide (C), nitric oxide synthetase (D), xanthine oxidase (E), malondialdehyde (F), caspase-3 (G) levels. Bar graph showing the pathological scores (H) is also shown
Values are expressed as mean ± SD. DA – darbepoetin-α, MP – methylprednisolone, GPx – glutathione peroxidase, SOD – superoxide dismutase, NO – nitric oxide, NOS – nitric oxide synthetase, XO – xanthine oxidase, MDA – malondialdehyde.
Figure 2A – Photomicrograph of sham group, showing regular brain parenchyma (hematoxylin-eosin, 20× objective). B – Photomicrograph of trauma group, showing marked edema, vascular congestion and neuronal injury findings (hematoxylin-eosin, 20× objective). The filled arrows show the injured neurons. Note only the few normal appearing neurons (hollow arrows). C – Photomicrograph of darbepoetin alpha group, showing less edema and degenerated neuron (filled arrow). Note the normal appearing neurons (hollow arrow) (hematoxylin-eosin, 20× objective). The brain tissues were well protected from injury. D – Photomicrograph of MP group, showing less degenerated neurons (filled arrow), and more normal appearing neurons (hollow arrow) (hematoxylin-eosin, 20× objective)
Biochemical and histopathological differences among the groups
| Variables | Sham | Trauma | DA | MP | Value of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPx [IU/mg] | 0.033 ±0.006[ | 0.015 ±0.007[ | 0.026 ±0.003[ | 0.027 ±0.003[ | < 0.001[ |
| SOD [U/mg] | 1.94 ±0.12[ | 0.66 ±0.14[ | 1.61±0.33[ | 1.42 ±0.19c[ | < 0.001[ |
| NO [µmol/mg] | 3.44 ±0.31[ | 5.8 ±0.26[ | 3.49 ±0.21[ | 3.51 ±0.48[ | < 0.001[ |
| NOS [IU/mg] | 1.01 ±0.15[ | 2.26 ±0.37[ | 1.11 ±0.22[ | 1.12 ±0.17[ | < 0.001[ |
| XO [mIU/mg] | 0.002 ±0.001[ | 0.075 ±0.007[ | 0.017 ±0.014[ | 0.012 ±0.001[ | < 0.001[ |
| MDA [nmol/mg] | 1.57 ±0.23[ | 2.66 ±0.32[ | 1.74 ±0.25[ | 1.79 ±0.25c[ | < 0.001[ |
| Caspase-3 [U/mg] | 210.4 ±80.02[ | 321.8 ±83.67[ | 222.5 ±42.23[ | 233.4 ±85.4[ | < 0.001[ |
| Pathology | 0.0 ±0.00[ | 2.62 ±0.51[ | 1.83 ±0.36[ | 1.87 ±0.64c[ | < 0.001[ |
Values are expressed as mean ± SD. DA – darbepoetin α, MP – methylprednisolone, GPx – glutathione peroxidase, SOD – superoxide dismutase, NO – nitric oxide, NOS – nitric oxide synthetase, XO – xanthine oxidase, MDA – malondialdehyde.
One-way ANOVA
Kruskal-Wallis test
– sham vs. trauma (p < 0.001)
– DA vs. trauma (p < 0.05)
– MP vs. trauma (p < 0.05)
– DA vs. sham (p < 0.05)
– MP vs. sham (p < 0.05)
– DA vs. MP (p < 0.001)