| Literature DB >> 26528294 |
Gemma L Hoyle1, Kathryn J Steadman2, Roger B Good3, Emma J McIntosh1, Lucy M E Galea1, Adrienne B Nicotra1.
Abstract
Seed germination strategies vary dramatically among species but relatively little is known about how germination traits correlate with other elements of plant strategy systems. Understanding drivers of germination strategy is critical to our understanding of the evolutionary biology of plant reproduction.We present a novel assessment of seed germination strategies focussing on Australian alpine species as a case study. We describe the distribution of germination strategies and ask whether these are correlated with, or form an independent axis to, other plant functional traits. Our approach to describing germination strategy mimicked realistic temperatures that seeds experience in situ following dispersal. Strategies were subsequently assigned using an objective clustering approach. We hypothesized that two main strategies would emerge, involving dormant or non-dormant seeds, and that while these strategies would be correlated with seed traits (e.g., mass or endospermy) they would be largely independent of vegetative traits when analysed in a phylogenetically structured manner.Across all species, three germination strategies emerged. The majority of species postponed germination until after a period of cold, winter-like temperatures indicating physiological and/or morphological dormancy mechanisms. Other species exhibited immediate germination at temperatures representative of those at dispersal. Interestingly, seeds of an additional 13 species "staggered" germination over time. Germination strategies were generally conserved within families. Across a broad range of ecological traits only seed mass and endospermy showed any correlation with germination strategy when phylogenetic relatedness was accounted for; vegetative traits showed no significant correlations with germination strategy. The results indicate that germination traits correlate with other aspects of seed ecology but form an independent axis relative to vegetative traits.Entities:
Keywords: alpine plants; climate change; dormancy; endosperm; germination strategy; phylogenetic regression
Year: 2015 PMID: 26528294 PMCID: PMC4600905 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00731
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1Monthly maximum and minimum air and soil temperature data in the Australian Alps (mean ± STDEV). Air temperatures are averages from the BOM database, soil temperatures were measured with iButtons (see methods). Bars indicate experimental incubator temperatures (mean ± STDEV). The equivalent time of year (season), incubator temperature regime (°C, 12/12 h, light/dark) and duration of treatment (weeks) as indicated in the top panel.
Study species, family and authority, growth form, and collections details, percentage seed viability (TZ-estimated, ± s.e.), final percentage germination achieved (± s.e.), statistical difference between viability and germination (G < V, tested only in cases where germination was less than viability).
| Apiaceae | Herb | 11-Mar-09 | 2164 | 100 | 0 | 95 | 3.8 | ns | Postponed | CANB 782521 | |
| Herb | 17-Feb-10 | 1937 | 85 | 4.8 | 91 | 2.1 | Postponed | CANB 792173 | |||
| Herb | 12-Mar-09 | 1698 | 100 | 0 | 81 | 5.9 | * | Postponed | CANB 782524 | ||
| Herb | 16-Feb-10 | 1743 | 85 | 15 | 80 | 3 | ns | Postponed | CANB 792163 | ||
| Herb | 28-Jan-10 | 1960 | 64 | 16 | 88 | 3.1 | Postponed | CANB 786949 | |||
| Herb | 16-Feb-10 | 1740 | 97 | 3.3 | 94 | 1.2 | ns | Postponed | CANB 792164 | ||
| Herb | 24-Mar-09 | 1748 | 92 | 8.3 | 94 | 2.6 | Staggered (A2) | CANB 783452 | |||
| Herb | 27-Jan-10 | 1748 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 0 | Staggered (A3) | CANB 792149 | |||
| Herb | 24-Feb-09 | 1743 | 97 | 2.8 | 93 | 3.1 | ns | Staggered (A2) | CANB 783437 | ||
| Herb | 3-Feb-10 | 1744 | 83 | 12 | 54 | 9 | ns | Postponed | CANB 792151 | ||
| Herb | 4-Feb-10 | 1733 | 77 | 8.8 | 88 | 2.9 | Staggered (A3) | CANB 786952 | |||
| Herb | 31-Mar-11 | 2092 | 67 | 6.7 | 1 | 1 | *** | too low to score | CANB 798462 | ||
| Asteraceae | Herb | 2-Mar-11 | 2090 | 77 | 5.5 | 65 | 3.1 | ns | Immediate | CANB 797826 | |
| Herb | 5-Feb-10 | 1941 | 70 | 15 | 22 | 6.4 | * | Staggered (B2) | CANB 792161 | ||
| Herb | 2-Mar-11 | 2046 | 61 | 3.2 | 90 | 3.5 | Staggered (B2) | CANB 798295 | |||
| Herb | 1-Feb-11 | 1730 | 70 | 10 | 78 | 3.6 | Immediate | CANB 797734 | |||
| Herb | 3-Mar-11 | 2067 | 93 | 3.3 | 93 | 2.1 | ns | Immediate | CANB 798305 | ||
| Herb | 25-Feb-09 | 1996 | 93 | 3.7 | 96 | 1.6 | Immediate | CANB 783441 | |||
| Herb | 29-Jan-10 | 1730 | 83 | 6.7 | 95 | 1.9 | Immediate | CANB 792150 | |||
| Herb | 17-Feb-10 | 2007 | 70 | 5.8 | 93 | 4.3 | Immediate | CANB 792172 | |||
| Herb | 4-Feb-10 | 1928 | 57 | 1.5 | 100 | 0 | Immediate | CANB 792158 | |||
| Mat/ Herb | 11-Mar-09 | 2212 | 77 | 3.3 | 100 | 0 | Immediate | CANB 782523 | |||
| Shrub | 9-Apr-09 | 1605 | 82 | 19 | 21 | 13.8 | * | Staggered (A3) | CANB 782558 | ||
| Campanulaceae | Herb | 3-Feb-10 | 1744 | 87 | 7.2 | 78 | 10.6 | ns | Staggered (A2) | CANB 792185 | |
| Caryophyllaceae | Herb | 25-Mar-09 | 2069 | 90 | 5.8 | 95 | 3.9 | Immediate | CANB 782529 | ||
| Herb | 5-Jan-10 | 1736 | 93 | 3.3 | 100 | 0 | Immediate | CANB 786943 | |||
| Mat/ Cushion | 10-Mar-09 | 1751 | 77 | 6.5 | 82 | 3.6 | Immediate | CANB 782512 | |||
| Cyperaceae | Sedge | 4-Jan-09 | 1613 | 77 | 5.5 | 78 | 5.5 | Postponed | CANB 771067 | ||
| Sedge | 5-Jan-10 | 1640 | 96 | 3.7 | 93 | 2.3 | ns | Postponed | CANB 771067 | ||
| Sedge | 21-Jan-09 | 1684 | 83 | 11 | 98 | 1.5 | Postponed | CANB 783404 | |||
| Sedge | 3-Feb-10 | 1742 | 83 | 3.3 | 98 | 2.1 | Postponed | CANB 792155 | |||
| Sedge | 3-Feb-10 | 1730 | 86 | 8.8 | 84 | 5.9 | ns | Postponed | CANB 792153 | ||
| Sedge | 7-Apr-09 | 1945 | 80 | 5.5 | 81 | 8.9 | Postponed | CANB 782540 | |||
| Sedge | 3-Mar-11 | 2047 | 97 | 3.3 | 13 | 15.7 | *** | Postponed | CANB 798306 | ||
| Droseraceae | Herb | 27-Jan-10 | 1752 | 97 | 3.3 | 98 | 1.2 | Postponed | CANB 786948 | ||
| Ericaceae | (Sub) shrub | 26-Mar-09 | 1745 | 71 | 5.8 | 93 | 3.2 | Postponed | CANB 782533 | ||
| Mat/Sub -shrub | 17-Feb-10 | 2096 | 85 | 8.3 | 27 | 4.3 | *** | Postponed | CANB 792168 | ||
| (Sub) shrub | 8-Apr-09 | 2078 | 83 | 3.8 | 95 | 1.1 | Postponed | CANB 782545 | |||
| Gentiananaceae | Herb | 24-Mar-09 | 1748 | 62 | 9.6 | 74 | 3.8 | Postponed | CANB 783451 | ||
| Herb | 30-Mar-11 | 2109 | 83 | 3.8 | 1 | 1 | *** | too low to score | CANB 798460 | ||
| Juncaceae | Rush | 10-Mar-09 | 1742 | 64 | 4.7 | 54 | 15.8 | ns | Postponed | CANB 782513 | |
| Rush | 25-Feb-09 | 1932 | 73 | 3.3 | 68 | 4.9 | ns | Immediate | CANB 783440 | ||
| Rush | 16-Feb-11 | 1957 | 93 | 3.3 | 93 | 1 | ns | Immediate | CANB 797746 | ||
| Liliaceae | Herb | 4-Feb-10 | 1880 | 77 | 3.3 | 76 | 12.9 | ns | Postponed | CANB 792157 | |
| Herb | 4-Feb-10 | 1830 | 63 | 8.8 | 80 | 3.5 | Staggered (A2) | CANB 792156 | |||
| Herb | 3-Mar-11 | 1758 | 53 | 3.3 | 0 | 0 | *** | too low to score | CANB 797834 | ||
| Poaceae | Grass | 2-Mar-11 | 2041 | 83 | 3.3 | 79 | 2.9 | ns | Staggered (B2) | CANB 798298 | |
| Grass | 24-Feb-09 | 1743 | 83 | 8.8 | 96 | 2.4 | Staggered (A2) | CANB 783436 | |||
| Grass | 30-Mar-11 | 2109 | 73 | 6.7 | 75 | 4 | Immediate | CANB 798459 | |||
| Grass | 2-Mar-11 | 2042 | 83 | 8.8 | 65 | 4.3 | ns | Immediate | CANB 798300 | ||
| Grass | 5-Feb-09 | 1747 | 77 | 3.5 | 78 | 5.6 | Immediate | CANB 783601 | |||
| Grass | 2-Mar-11 | 2041 | 100 | 0 | 88 | 5.4 | ns | Immediate | CANB 798297 | ||
| Grass | 15-Feb-11 | 1925 | 97 | 3.3 | 96 | 1.6 | ns | Immediate | CANB 797742 | ||
| Plantaginaceae | Herb | 16-Feb-11 | 1953 | 93 | 3.7 | 82 | 3.4 | ns | Immediate | CANB 797747 | |
| Ranunculaceae | Herb | 5-Feb-10 | 1941 | 96 | 3.7 | 98 | 1.2 | Postponed | CANB 792160 | ||
| Herb | 6-Jan-10 | 2039 | 57 | 27 | 76 | 4.7 | Immediate | CANB 786947 | |||
| Herb | 29-Jan-10 | 1742 | 75 | 6.9 | 95 | 2 | Staggered (B2) | CANB 792145 | |||
| Herb | 24-Mar-09 | 1747 | 68 | 17 | 84 | 3.4 | Postponed | CANB 783454 | |||
| Herb | 27-Jan-10 | 1752 | 48 | 15 | 86 | 6 | Postponed | CANB 792148 | |||
| Herb | 6-Jan-10 | 1734 | 81 | 9.2 | 89 | 4.3 | Staggered (A2) | CANB 786945 | |||
| Herb | 5-Jan-10 | 1943 | 97 | 3.3 | 81 | 1.2 | ** | Postponed | CANB 786944 | ||
| Herb | 28-Jan-10 | 1955 | 74 | 16 | 96 | 2.4 | Staggered (A2) | CANB 786950 | |||
| Scrophulariaceae | Herb | 16-Feb-11 | 2047 | 93 | 6.7 | 2.3 | 1.3 | *** | too low to score | CANB 797754 | |
| Stackhousiaceae | Mat | 8-Apr-09 | 2085 | 67 | 8.3 | 4 | 1.6 | *** | too low to score | CANB 782543 | |
| Thymalaceae | (Sub) shrub | 4-Jan-09 | 1616 | 47 | 11 | 23 | 4.8 | ns | Postponed | CANB 771063 | |
Cluster refers to germination strategy, see .
Indicates endemic species (Costin et al., .
Indicates species that were cycled through the experiment for a second “year.”
P < 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 shown as .
Figure 2Cluster analysis dendrogram based on time to cumulative germination percentiles (20, 40, 50, 60, 80, and 95%). Species indicated by genus initial and first part of species name. Asterisks mark collections that were banked prior to testing. Fine arcs connect duplicate collections to compare effect of banking on germination. Symbols denote different families (see legend). Collections shown in gray text are those that were exposed to two cycles of the experiment.
Figure 3Cumulative percentage germination of one representative species from each germination cluster. (A) cluster A, species that postponed germination, (B) cluster B, species that germinated immediately. Note that staggered germination patterns are nested within the above clusters. Incubator temperature regimes are represented by shading (see Figure 1).
Incidence of phylogenetic structure in, and correlates of, germination strategy.
| Germination strategy | 1.532 | 0.000 | na | na | na |
| Seed mass | 1.527 | 0.000 | |||
| Endospermic/Non | −9.030 | 0.000 | 0.003366 | ||
| Height | 1.070 | 0.022 | 0.1276 | 0.4391 | 0.01948 |
| SLA | < 0.0001 | 1.000 | 0.7886 | 0.2082 | 0.1998 |
| Surface area | < 0.0001 | 1.000 | 0.9141 | 0.4042 | 0.7755 |
| Leaf dry weight | 1.783 | 0.020 | 0.6367 | 0.2903 | 0.6017 |
| Average elevation | < 0.0001 | 1.000 | 0.6521 | 0.5852 | 0.5954 |
| Range | 1.227 | 0.013 | 0.5775 | 0.8864 | 0.63 |
| Light requirement 50% | 1.532 | 0.000 | 0.1738 | 0.5999 | 0.2943 |
| Light requirement 95% | 1.007 | 0.180 | 0.8247 | 0.5494 | 0.9611 |
| Growth form (woody/non) | −0.690 | 1.000 | 0.1135 | 0.8466 | 0.1499 |
Bold indicates significance in non-phylogenetic analyses, yellow cells indicate phylogenetic structure or significance in PGLS regressions.
Germination strategy shows phylogenetic structure at all levels of clustering.
Phylogenetic structure for endospermy and woodiness assessed with Phylo-D for binary value. Probability values for D reflect probablity of pattern resulting from random (no phylogenetic) structure.
Figure 4Differences in (A) average seed mass and (B) proportion of species with endospermic seeds among species with postponed (cluster A1), staggered (combination of cluster A2, A3, and B2) and immediate germination (cluster B1) strategies. Differences among strategies are significant at P ≤ 0.05, see Table 2.