| Literature DB >> 24415831 |
Erich Schwienbacher1, Jose Antonio Navarro-Cano1, Gilbert Neuner1, Brigitta Erschbamer1.
Abstract
In alpine species the classification of the various mechanisms underlying seed dormancy has been rather questionable and controversial. Thus, we investigated 28 alpine species to evaluate the prevailing types of dormancy. Embryo type and water impermeability of seed coats gave an indication of the potential seed dormancy class. To ascertain the actual dormancy class and level, we performed germination experiments comparing the behavior of seeds without storage, after cold-dry storage, after cold-wet storage, and scarification. We also tested the light requirement for germination in some species. Germination behavior was characterized using the final germination percentage and the mean germination time. Considering the effects of the pretreatments, a refined classification of the prevailing dormancy types was constructed based on the results of our pretreatments. Only two out of the 28 species that we evaluated had predominantly non-dormant seeds. Physiological dormancy was prevalent in 20 species, with deep physiological dormancy being the most abundant, followed by non-deep and intermediate physiological dormancy. Seeds of four species with underdeveloped embryos were assigned to the morphophysiologial dormancy class. An impermeable seed coat was identified in two species, with no additional physiological germination block. We defined these species as having physical dormancy. Light promoted the germination of seeds without storage in all but one species with physiological dormancy. In species with physical dormancy, light responses were of minor importance. We discuss our new classification in the context of former germination studies and draw implications for the timing of germination in the field.Entities:
Keywords: CDSfresh, cold-dry storage of seeds before incubation under long-day conditions; CDSsc, scarification of seeds following cold-dry storage before incubation under long-day conditions; CWSfresh, cold-wet storage of seeds before incubation under long-day conditions; CWSsubs, cold-wet storage subsequent to a germination experiment before incubation under long-day conditions; Cold-dry seed storage; Cold-wet seed storage; Dormancy classification; Embryo morphology; FGP, final germination percentage; FRESHLD, seeds without storage incubated under long-day conditions; FRESHdark, seeds without storage incubated in darkness; FRESHsc, scarification of seeds without storage before incubation under long-day conditions; GA3, gibberellic acid; Light response; MD, morphological dormancy; MGT, mean germination time; MPD, morphophysiological dormancy; ND, non-dormant; PD, physiological dormancy; PY, physical dormancy; PY + PD, combinational dormancy of PY and PD; Scarification
Year: 2011 PMID: 24415831 PMCID: PMC3886365 DOI: 10.1016/j.flora.2011.05.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Flora ISSN: 0367-2530 Impact factor: 2.088
Alpine species used in the germination experiments, their family affiliation, description of the dispersal units, and the germination experiments conducted for each species. Seeds without storage were tested under long-day conditions (FRESHLD) or in darkness (FRESHdark). Cold-wet storage was applied either on seeds after a short period (max. 10 weeks) of cold-dry storage (CWSfresh) or subsequent to a germination experiment on fresh seeds using any remaining viable seeds (CWSsubs). For cold-dry storage, fresh seeds were used (CDSfresh). The effect of scarification was tested on seeds without storage (FRESHSC) and following cold-dry storage (CDSsc). For details of collection year, storage period, starting time, and incubation period of germination experiments, number of replicates, and number of seeds per replicate see Appendix A.
| Species | Family | Dispersal units | Germination experiments | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRESHLD | FRESHdark | FRESHsc | CWSfresh | CWSsubs | CDSfresh | CDSsc | |||
| Asteraceae | Fruits (single-seeded achenes) | X | X | – | X | – | X | – | |
| Fabaceae | Fruits (mostly single-seeded siliculae) | X | X | X | X | – | X | X | |
| Brassicaceae | Winged seeds | X | – | – | – | X | X | – | |
| Caryophyllaceae | Seeds | X | – | – | – | X | – | – | |
| Asteraceae | Fruits (single-seeded achenes) | X | X | – | X | – | X | – | |
| Campanulaceae | Seeds | X | – | – | – | X | – | ||
| Cyperaceae | Fruits (single-seeded nutlets with utriculus) | X | – | – | – | X | X | – | |
| Caryophyllaceae | Seeds | X | – | – | – | X | X | – | |
| Gentianaceae | Seeds | X | – | – | – | X | – | – | |
| Brassicaceae | Seeds | X | – | – | – | X | – | – | |
| Brassicaceae | Seeds | X | – | – | – | X | – | – | |
| Brassicaceae | Seeds | X | – | – | – | X | – | – | |
| Onagraceae | Plumed seeds | X | – | – | – | – | X | – | |
| Asteraceae | Fruits (single-seeded achenes with pappus) | X | – | – | – | – | X | – | |
| Gentianaceae | Seeds | X | – | – | – | X | – | – | |
| Rosaceae | Fruits (single-seeded nutlets with elongated hairy style) | X | X | – | X | – | X | – | |
| Asteraceae | Fruits (single-seeded achenes with pappus) | X | – | – | – | – | X | – | |
| Antirrhinaceae | Winged seeds | X | X | – | X | – | – | – | |
| Caryophyllaceae | Seeds | X | – | – | – | X | – | – | |
| Polygonaceae | Fruits (single-seeded achenes with wings) | X | X | – | X | – | X | – | |
| Poaceae | Fruits (single-seeded caryopses, in part attached to glumes) | X | X | – | – | – | X | – | |
| Rosaceae | Fruits (single-seeded nutlets) | X | – | – | – | X | – | – | |
| Rosaceae | Fruits (single-seeded nutlets) | X | – | – | – | X | – | – | |
| Ranunculaceae | Fruits (single-seeded nutlets) | X | – | – | – | X | – | – | |
| Saxifragaceae | Seeds | X | X | – | X | – | X | – | |
| Saxifragaceae | Seeds | X | X | – | X | – | – | – | |
| Caryophyllaceae | Seeds | X | – | – | – | – | X | – | |
| Fabaceae | Seeds | X | X | X | X | – | X | X | |
Nomenclature follows Fischer et al. (2008).
To improve readability, we use Anthyllis alpicola.
To test the effect of scarification, fruit coat was removed and scarified seeds were used.
For germination experiments, all glumes were removed.
To improve readability, we use Silene exscapa.
Potential seed dormancy classes of the investigated species based on the reference species with a literature-based description of endosperm characteristics, embryo type, and potential for water impermeability of the seed coat (PWI).
| Species | Reference species | Endosperm | Embryo | PWI | Dormancy classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not present | Spatulate fully developed | No | ND/PD | ||
| Non-starchy | Bent | Yes | PY/PY + PD | ||
| Not present | Bent | No | ND/PD | ||
| Conspicuously | Peripheral | No | ND/PD | ||
| Not present | Spatulate fully developed | No | ND/PD | ||
| Non-starchy | Linear underdeveloped | No | MD/MPD | ||
| Starchy | Capitate | No | ND/PD | ||
| Conspicuously | Peripheral | No | ND/PD | ||
| Non-starchy | Linear underdeveloped | No | MD/MPD | ||
| Not present | Bent | No | ND/PD | ||
| Not present | Bent | No | ND/PD | ||
| Not present | Bent | No | ND/PD | ||
| Not present | Spatulate fully developed | No | ND/PD | ||
| Not present | Spatulate fully developed | No | ND/PD | ||
| Non-starchy | Linear underdeveloped | No | MD/MPD | ||
| Not present | Spatulate fully developed | No | ND/PD | ||
| Not present | Spatulate fully developed | No | ND/PD | ||
| Non-starchy | Linear fully developed | No | ND/PD | ||
| Conspicuously | Peripheral | No | ND/PD | ||
| Conspicuously | Peripheral | No | ND/PD | ||
| Starchy | Lateral | No | ND/PD | ||
| Non-starchy | Spatulate fully developed | No | ND/PD | ||
| Non-starchy | Spatulate fully developed | No | ND/PD | ||
| Non-starchy | Rudimentary | No | MD/MPD | ||
| Non-starchy | Linear fully developed | No | ND/PD | ||
| Non-starchy | Linear fully developed | No | ND/PD | ||
| Conspicuously | Peripheral | No | ND/PD | ||
| Non-starchy | Bent | Yes | PY/PY + PD |
ND = non-dormant; PD = physiological dormancy; MD = morphological dormancy; MPD = morphophysiological dormancy; PY = physical dormancy; PY + PD = combinational dormancy.
All from Martin (1946) if not otherwise indicated.
As in Martin (1946).
Determined from reference species according to Baskin and Baskin (2007).
Family comprises of species with water impermeable seed coats (Baskin et al., 2000).
Inferred from endosperm characteristics, embryo type, and water impermeability of seed coat (Baskin and Baskin, 2004b).
Actually perisperm.
Baskin and Baskin (2005).
Wagner and Tengg (1993).
Akhalkatsi and Wagner (1997).
Wagner et al. (2010).
Borderline case with embryo:seed length ratio = 0.5–0.6.
Fig. 1Final germination percentage (FGP) of seeds without storage under long-day conditions for the species groups defined by potential dormancy classes (for assignments of species see Table 2). The box plots illustrate the median, minimum, and maximum, and the box encompasses values from the 1st to the 3rd quartile. ND = non-dormant; PD = physiological dormancy; MD = morphological dormancy; MPD = morphophysiological dormancy; PY = physical dormancy; PY + PD = combinational dormancy.
Final germination percentage (FGP, mean ± s.e.) of ND/PD and MD/MPD species with an overall low germination success yielded in different germination experiments.
| Potential dormancy classes | FGP (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species | FRESHLD | FRESHdark | CWS | CDSfresh |
| ND/PD | ||||
| 6.0 ± 2.5 | – | 19.0 ± 3.7 | 5.8 ± 0.5 | |
| 0 ± 0 | – | 0 ± 0 | – | |
| 0 ± 0 | – | 2.0 ± 1.1 | 0 ± 0 | |
| 14.4 ± 1.6 | – | 33.0 ± 12.4 | 17.0 ± 3.4 | |
| 0 | – | 2 | – | |
| 0 | – | 2 | – | |
| 2 | – | 0 | – | |
| 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0.0 ± 0 | – | |
| 6.1 | – | 8.9 | – | |
| 4.0 | – | 23.4 | – | |
| 0 | – | 1.0 | – | |
| 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 1.4 ± 0.5 | – | |
FRESHLD = seeds without storage under long-day conditions; FRESHdark = seeds without storage in darkness; CWS = cold-wet storage; CDSfresh = cold-dry storage. ND = non-dormant; PD = physiological dormancy; MD = morphological dormancy; MPD = morphophysiological dormancy.
CWS refers to CWSsubs, except for L. alpina and S. oppositifolia for which CWSfresh was conducted.
Fig. 2Germination course and mean germination time (MGT, vertical lines) of seeds without storage in comparison with seeds exposed to different storage conditions from selected species of the ND/PD group. ND = non-dormant; PD = physiological dormancy; FRESHLD = fresh seeds under long-day conditions (– ● –); CWSfresh = cold-wet storage (□); CDSfresh = cold-dry storage (▵). Groups revealed by post hoc group comparison at a significance level of P < 0.05 are indicated with different letters at the right end of the regression lines for final germination (%) and at the top of the vertical dashed lines for MGT, respectively. Symbols show means ± s.e.
Fig. 3Germination course and mean germination time (MGT, vertical lines) of seeds without scarification (closed symbols) and with scarification (open symbols) from species of the PY/PY + PD group. PY = physical dormancy; PY + PD = PY and physiological dormancy; upper panels (circles) = seeds without storage; lower panels (triangles) = cold-dry storage. Significant differences between both treatments are indicated for final germination (%) and MGT of each species (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001). Symbols show means ± s.e.
Fig. 4Germination course and mean germination time (MGT, vertical lines) of seeds without storage in darkness (FRESHdark, – ■ –) or under long-day conditions (FRESHLD, – ○ –). (A) Selected species for which non-dormant or physiological dormant (PD) seeds were assumed and (B) species for which physical dormancy (PY) or a combinational dormancy (PY + PD) was assumed. Significant differences between both light conditions are indicated for final germination (%) and MGT of each species (n.s., P ≥ 0.05; * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001). Symbols show means ± s.e.
Key used for the determination of prevailing seed dormancy class and level, based on germination experiments with different preconditions following preliminary assignment to potential classes.
| Potential dormancy classes | Class and level |
|---|---|
| 1.1. FGP (FRESHLD) ≥ FGP(CDSfresh) and FGP (FRESHLD) ≥ FGP (CWSfresh/CWSsubs) and MGT (FRESHLD) ≤ MGT (CDSfresh) and MGT (FRESHLD) ≤ MGT(CWSfresh/CWSsubs) and FGP (FRESHLD) ≥ 50% | |
| Yes | ND |
| No | 1.2 |
| 1.2. FGP (CDSfresh) ≥ FGP(CWSfresh/CWSsubs) and MGT (CDSfresh) ≤ MGT (CWSfresh/CWSsubs) and FGP (CDSfresh) ≥ 50% | |
| Yes | PD, non-deep level |
| No | 1.3 |
| 1.3 FGP (FRESHLD) ≥ 50% or FGP (CDSfresh) ≥ 50% or FGP (CWSfresh/CWSsubs) ≥ 50% | |
| Yes | PD, intermediate level |
| No | PD, deep level |
| 2.1. FGP (FRESHLD) ≥ 50% | |
| Yes | MD |
| No | MPD |
| 3.1. FGP (FRESHLD) ≥ FGP(FRESHsc) and MGT (FRESHLD) ≤ MGT (FRESHsc) and FGP (FRESHLD) ≥ 50% | |
| Yes (assumption of impermeable seed coat dismissed!) | ND |
| No | 3.2 |
| 3.2. FGP (FRESHsc) ≥ 50% | |
| Yes | PY |
| No | PY + PD |
For unknown values of FGP or MGT the truth-value of the functional operation was assumed to become TRUE, except for the comparison of FGP with 50%, where missing values resulted in a FALSE.
FGP = final germination percentage; MGT = mean germination time; ND = non-dormant; PD = physiological dormancy; MD = morphological dormancy; MPD = morphophysiological dormancy; PY = physical dormancy; PY + PD = combinational dormancy; FRESHLD = seeds without storage under long-day conditions; CWSfresh = cold-wet storage; CWSsubs = cold-wet storage subsequent to a germination experiment; CDSfresh = cold-dry storage; FRESHsc = scarification of seeds without storage.
Refined assignment of the 28 species to the prevailing dormancy class and level.
| Species | Dormancy | |
|---|---|---|
| Class | Level of PD | |
| PD | Non-deep | |
| PY | – | |
| PD | Deep | |
| PD | Deep | |
| PD | Non-deep | |
| MPD | – | |
| PD | Deep | |
| PD | Deep | |
| MPD | – | |
| PD | Deep | |
| PD | Deep | |
| PD | Deep | |
| PD | Non-deep | |
| ND | – | |
| MPD | – | |
| PD | Intermediate | |
| ND | – | |
| PD | Deep | |
| PD | Deep | |
| PD | Intermediate | |
| PD | Non-deep | |
| PD | Deep | |
| PD | Deep | |
| MPD | – | |
| PD | Non-deep | |
| PD | Deep | |
| PD | Non-deep | |
| PY | – | |
ND = non-dormant; PD = physiological dormancy; MPD = morphophysiological dormancy; PY = physical dormancy.
| Species | CT | SP | ST | IP | Seeds | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRESHSTD | 10-2004 | ≤1 | 10-2004 | 32 | 5 | 100 |
| FRESHdark | 10-2004 | ≤1 | 10-2004 | 32 | 5 | 100 |
| CWSfresh | 09-2000 | 10 | 01-2001 | 33 | 5 | 100 |
| CDSfresh | 09-2007 | 37 | 06-2008 | 31 | 4 | 50 |
| FRESHSTD | 09-2004 | ≤1 | 09-2004 | 32 | 5 | 100 |
| FRESHdark | 09-2004 | ≤1 | 09-2004 | 32 | 5 | 100 |
| FRESHsc | 08-2010 | ≤1 | 08-2010 | 31 | 4 | 50 |
| CWSfresh | 09-2000 | 10 | 01-2001 | 33 | 5 | 100 |
| CDSfresh | 09-2006 | 45 | 07-2007 | 31 | 4 | 50 |
| CDSsc | 09-2006 | 72 | 01-2008 | 32 | 4 | 50 |
| FRESHSTD | 08-2007 | ≤1 | 08-2007 | 33 | 5 | 50 |
| CWSsubs | 08-2007 | 19 | 02-2008 | 62 | 5 | 45.0 |
| CDSfresh | 09-2006 | 45 | 07-2007 | 31 | 4 | 50 |
| FRESHSTD | 09-2007 | ≤1 | 09-2007 | 58 | 5 | 50 |
| CWSsubs | 09-2007 | 15 | 03-2008 | 60 | 5 | 49.6 |
| FRESHSTD | 09-2004 | ≤1 | 09-2004 | 33 | 5 | 100 |
| FRESHdark | 09-2004 | ≤1 | 09-2004 | 33 | 5 | 100 |
| CWSfresh | 08-2000 | 10 | 01-2001 | 33 | 5 | 100 |
| CDSfresh | 09-2007 | 37 | 06-2008 | 31 | 4 | 50 |
| FRESHSTD | 09-2007 | ≤1 | 09-2007 | 58 | 5 | 50 |
| CWSsubs | 09-2007 | 15 | 03-2008 | 60 | 5 | 35.8 |
| FRESHSTD | 08-2007 | ≤1 | 08-2007 | 36 | 5 | 50 |
| CWSsubs | 08-2007 | 19 | 03-2008 | 63 | 5 | 49.0 |
| CDSfresh | 09-2007 | 26 | 02-2008 | 59 | 5 | 50 |
| FRESHSTD | 08-2007 | ≤1 | 08-2007 | 33 | 5 | 50 |
| CWSsubs | 08-2007 | 19 | 02-2008 | 62 | 5 | 30.6 |
| CDSfresh | 09-2006 | 64 | 12-2007 | 32 | 4 | 25 |
| FRESHSTD | 08-2009 | ≤1 | 08-2009 | 29 | 1 | 50 |
| CWSsubs | 08-2009 | 19 | 02-2010 | 32 | 1 | 50 |
| FRESHSTD | 08-2009 | ≤1 | 08-2009 | 29 | 1 | 50 |
| CWSsubs | 08-2009 | 19 | 02-2010 | 32 | 1 | 49 |
| FRESHSTD | 08-2009 | ≤1 | 08-2009 | 29 | 1 | 50 |
| CWSsubs | 08-2009 | 19 | 02-2010 | 32 | 1 | 50 |
| FRESHSTD | 08-2009 | ≤1 | 08-2009 | 29 | 1 | 50 |
| CWSsubs | 08-2009 | 19 | 02-2010 | 32 | 1 | 49 |
| FRESHSTD | 09-2007 | ≤1 | 09-2007 | 32 | 5 | 50 |
| CDSfresh | 09-2007 | 37 | 06-2008 | 31 | 4 | 50 |
| FRESHSTD | 08-2007 | ≤1 | 08-2007 | 32 | 5 | 50 |
| CDSfresh | 08-2007 | 37 | 06-2008 | 31 | 4 | 50 |
| FRESHSTD | 09-2007 | ≤1 | 09-2007 | 58 | 5 | 50 |
| CWSsubs | 09-2007 | 15 | 03-2008 | 60 | 5 | 47.0 |
| FRESHSTD | 09-2004 | ≤1 | 09-2004 | 33 | 5 | 100 |
| FRESHdark | 09-2004 | ≤1 | 09-2004 | 33 | 5 | 100 |
| CWSfresh | 08-2000 | 10 | 01-2001 | 33 | 5 | 100 |
| CDSfresh | 08-2007 | 42 | 06-2008 | 31 | 4 | 50 |
| FRESHSTD | 09-2007 | ≤1 | 09-2007 | 32 | 5 | 30 |
| CDSfresh | 09-2006 | 45 | 07-2008 | 31 | 4 | 50 |
| FRESHSTD | 09-2004 | ≤1 | 09-2004 | 33 | 5 | 100 |
| FRESHdark | 09-2004 | ≤1 | 09-2004 | 33 | 5 | 100 |
| CWSfresh | 08-2000 | 10 | 01-2001 | 33 | 5 | 100 |
| FRESHSTD | 08-2007 | ≤1 | 08-2007 | 33 | 1 | 115 |
| CWSsubs | 08-2007 | 19 | 03-2008 | 63 | 1 | 79 |
| FRESHSTD | 08-2004 | ≤1 | 08-2004 | 33 | 5 | 100 |
| FRESHdark | 08-2004 | ≤1 | 08-2004 | 33 | 5 | 100 |
| CWSfresh | 08-2000 | 10 | 01-2001 | 33 | 5 | 90 |
| CDSfresh | 09-2006 | 45 | 07-2007 | 31 | 4 | 50 |
| FRESHSTD | 09-2004 | ≤1 | 08-2004 | 33 | 5 | 25 |
| FRESHdark | 09-2004 | ≤1 | 08-2004 | 32 | 5 | 25 |
| CDSfresh | 09-2006 | 45 | 07-2007 | 31 | 4 | 50 |
| FRESHSTD | 08-2009 | ≤1 | 08-2009 | 31 | 1 | 50 |
| CWSsubs | 08-2009 | 20 | 02-2010 | 32 | 1 | 47 |
| FRESHSTD | 08-2009 | ≤1 | 08-2009 | 31 | 2 | 50 |
| CWSsubs | 08-2009 | 20 | 02-2010 | 32 | 2 | 50 |
| FRESHSTD | 08-2009 | ≤1 | 09-2009 | 29 | 1 | 50 |
| CWSsubs | 08-2009 | 19 | 02-2010 | 32 | 1 | 48 |
| FRESHSTD | 10-2004 | ≤1 | 10-2004 | 31 | 5 | 100 |
| FRESHdark | 10-2004 | ≤1 | 10-2004 | 32 | 5 | 100 |
| CWSfresh | 09-2000 | 10 | 01-2001 | 33 | 5 | 100 |
| CDSfresh | 10-2006 | 40 | 07-2007 | 31 | 4 | 50 |
| FRESHSTD | 09-2004 | ≤1 | 09-2004 | 33 | 5 | 100 |
| FRESHdark | 09-2004 | ≤1 | 09-2004 | 31 | 5 | 100 |
| CWSfresh | 08-2000 | 10 | 01-2001 | 33 | 5 | 100 |
| FRESHSTD | 09-2007 | ≤1 | 09-2007 | 32 | 5 | 50 |
| CDSfresh | 09-2006 | 45 | 07-2007 | 31 | 4 | 50 |
| FRESHSTD | 09-2004 | ≤1 | 09-2004 | 33 | 5 | 100 |
| FRESHdark | 09-2004 | ≤1 | 09-2004 | 32 | 5 | 100 |
| FRESHsc | 09-2010 | ≤1 | 09-2010 | 31 | 4 | 50 |
| CWSfresh | 09-2000 | 10 | 01-2001 | 33 | 5 | 100 |
| CDSfresh | 09-2006 | 42 | 07-2007 | 31 | 4 | 50 |
| CDSsc | 09-2006 | 79 | 04-2008 | 28 | 4 | 50 |
Seeds were pinched with tweezers and soft seeds were discarded.
Mean number of remaining viable seeds per replicate following the germination experiment with fresh seeds.