Literature DB >> 26527369

Using the IRB Researcher Assessment Tool to Guide Quality Improvement.

Daniel E Hall1, Barbara H Hanusa2, Bruce S Ling2, Roslyn A Stone2, Galen E Switzer2, Michael J Fine2, Robert M Arnold3.   

Abstract

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) are intended to protect those who participate in research. However, because there is no established measure of IRB quality, it is unclear whether these committees achieve their goal. The IRB Researcher Assessment Tool is a previously validated, internally normed, proxy measure of IRB quality that assesses 45 distinct IRB activities and functions. We administered this instrument to a sample of investigators and IRB members at a large urban VA Medical Center. We describe a systematic approach to analyze and interpret survey responses that can identify the IRB activities and functions most in need of quality improvement. The proposed approach to empirical data analysis and presentation could inform local initiatives to improve the quality of IRB review.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Keywords:  Institutional Review Board; engineering; quality improvement; research ethics committee

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26527369      PMCID: PMC4644456          DOI: 10.1177/1556264615612195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  8 in total

1.  Protecting human research subjects.

Authors:  P W Fiscus
Journal:  J Biolaw Bus       Date:  2001

2.  The cost of operating institutional review boards (IRBs).

Authors:  Todd H Wagner; Aman Bhandari; Gary L Chadwick; Daniel K Nelson
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Assessing the quality of human research protection programs: the experience at the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Authors:  Min-Fu Tsan; Karen Smith; Baochong Gao
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

4.  Moving beyond compliance: measuring ethical quality to enhance the oversight of human subjects research.

Authors:  Holly A Taylor
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct

5.  What scientists want from their research ethics committee.

Authors:  Patricia Keith-Spiegel; Barbara Tabachnick
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  Investigating Perceived Institutional Review Board Quality and Function Using the IRB Researcher Assessment Tool.

Authors:  Jonathan C Reeser; Diane M Austin; Linda M Jaros; Bickol N Mukesh; Catherine A McCarty
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.742

7.  Assessing Institutional Ethics Committees in India Using the IRB-RAT.

Authors:  Tiffany Chenneville; Lynette Menezes; Lauren M Bylsma; Angela Mann; Jayendrakumar Kosambiya; Rajendra Baxi
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  How do we know that research ethics committees are really working? The neglected role of outcomes assessment in research ethics review.

Authors:  Carl H Coleman; Marie-Charlotte Bouësseau
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 2.652

  8 in total
  7 in total

1.  A Rare Opportunity: Examining the Experience of a New Institutional Review Board.

Authors:  Linda Parreco; Lisa Rooney; Sharon Hampp; Amanda Brown; Lori Minasian
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  Evaluating IACUCs: Previous Research and Future Directions.

Authors:  Madeline L Budda; Stacy L Pritt
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  Research approvals iceberg: how a 'low-key' study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can do better.

Authors:  Mila Petrova; Stephen Barclay
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 2.652

4.  Perspectives of Singaporean biomedical researchers and research support staff on actual and ideal IRB review functions and characteristics: A quantitative analysis.

Authors:  Markus K Labude; Liang Shen; Yujia Zhu; G Owen Schaefer; Catherine Ong; Vicki Xafis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Performance of IRBs in China: a survey on IRB employees and researchers' experiences and perceptions.

Authors:  Xing Liu; Ying Wu; Min Yang; Yang Li; Kaveh Khoshnood; Esther Luo; Lun Li; Xiaomin Wang
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 2.834

6.  Prioritizing Initiatives for Institutional Review Board (IRB) Quality Improvement.

Authors:  Daniel E Hall; Ulrike Feske; Barbara H Hanusa; Bruce S Ling; Roslyn A Stone; Shasha Gao; Galen E Switzer; Aram Dobalian; Michael J Fine; Robert M Arnold
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2016-06-23

7.  Evaluation of a University's Institutional Review Board Based on Campus Feedback: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Mohammad Hasan Rajab; Muhammad Z Alkawi; Abdalla M Gazal; Faizah A Alshehri; Hassan S Shaibah; Lisa Doraine Holmes
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-10-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.