| Literature DB >> 26527369 |
Daniel E Hall1, Barbara H Hanusa2, Bruce S Ling2, Roslyn A Stone2, Galen E Switzer2, Michael J Fine2, Robert M Arnold3.
Abstract
Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) are intended to protect those who participate in research. However, because there is no established measure of IRB quality, it is unclear whether these committees achieve their goal. The IRB Researcher Assessment Tool is a previously validated, internally normed, proxy measure of IRB quality that assesses 45 distinct IRB activities and functions. We administered this instrument to a sample of investigators and IRB members at a large urban VA Medical Center. We describe a systematic approach to analyze and interpret survey responses that can identify the IRB activities and functions most in need of quality improvement. The proposed approach to empirical data analysis and presentation could inform local initiatives to improve the quality of IRB review.Keywords: Institutional Review Board; engineering; quality improvement; research ethics committee
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26527369 PMCID: PMC4644456 DOI: 10.1177/1556264615612195
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics ISSN: 1556-2646 Impact factor: 1.742