Literature DB >> 25747296

Assessing Institutional Ethics Committees in India Using the IRB-RAT.

Tiffany Chenneville1, Lynette Menezes2, Lauren M Bylsma3, Angela Mann4, Jayendrakumar Kosambiya5, Rajendra Baxi6.   

Abstract

Institutional ethics committees (IECs) are currently still in their infancy in low- to middle-income countries (LMICs), which may have important implications with regard to the oversight of the protection of human participants. Understanding how these IECs currently function is a critical first step in helping LMICs build infrastructures that support the protection of research participants and improve the scientific quality of health research worldwide. We assessed the functioning of the IECs at two medical colleges in Gujarat, India, by administering the Institutional Review Board Researcher's Assessment Tool (IRB-RAT) to 42 IEC and faculty members. The IRB-RAT includes eight scales assessing various domains related to how investigators and members perceive their ethics committees. Results from t tests revealed significant differences between ideal ratings and descriptive ratings on each of the IRB-RAT scales with ideal ratings being higher than current descriptive ratings on all of the scales (<.001). These findings suggest areas that can be targeted for improvement and also provide important information about the values of Indian IECs.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ethics committees; low- to middle-income countries; research ethics; review boards

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25747296      PMCID: PMC4580327          DOI: 10.1177/1556264614544101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  15 in total

1.  The India HPV-vaccine suspension.

Authors:  Heidi J Larson; Pauline Brocard; Geoffrey Garnett
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman
Journal:  Dev World Bioeth       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.294

3.  What scientists want from their research ethics committee.

Authors:  Patricia Keith-Spiegel; Barbara Tabachnick
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.742

4.  Investigating Perceived Institutional Review Board Quality and Function Using the IRB Researcher Assessment Tool.

Authors:  Jonathan C Reeser; Diane M Austin; Linda M Jaros; Bickol N Mukesh; Catherine A McCarty
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Procedures & operations of Institutional Ethics Committees in public sector hospitals in Delhi, India.

Authors:  Shalini Singh
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Theoretical shortcomings of Institutional Review Boards and possible solutions.

Authors:  Mohammad Yaghoobi
Journal:  Arch Iran Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.354

Review 7.  A systematic review of the empirical literature evaluating IRBs: what we know and what we still need to learn.

Authors:  Lura Abbott; Christine Grady
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 8.  Establishment of ethical oversight of human research in El Salvador: lessons learned.

Authors:  Miguela A Caniza; Wilfrido Clara; Gabriela Maron; Jose Ernesto Navarro-Marin; Roberto Rivera; Scott C Howard; Jonathan Camp; Raymond C Barfield
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Ethics committees in India: Facing the challenges!

Authors:  Rashmi Kadam; Shashikant Karandikar
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2012-04

10.  The structure and function of research ethics committees in Africa: a case study.

Authors:  Nancy E Kass; Adnan Ali Hyder; Ademola Ajuwon; John Appiah-Poku; Nicola Barsdorf; Dya Eldin Elsayed; Mantoa Mokhachane; Bavon Mupenda; Paul Ndebele; Godwin Ndossi; Bornwell Sikateyo; Godfrey Tangwa; Paulina Tindana
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  8 in total

1.  Using the IRB Researcher Assessment Tool to Guide Quality Improvement.

Authors:  Daniel E Hall; Barbara H Hanusa; Bruce S Ling; Roslyn A Stone; Galen E Switzer; Michael J Fine; Robert M Arnold
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  A Case-Study of the Resources and Functioning of Two Research Ethics Committees in Western India.

Authors:  Tiffany Chenneville; Lynette Menezes; Jayendrakumar Kosambiya; Rajendra Baxi
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2016-07-31       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 3.  Ethics Committees in India: Past, present and future.

Authors:  Urmila M Thatte; Padmaja A Marathe
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

4.  Evaluating assessment tools of the quality of clinical ethics consultations: a systematic scoping review from 1992 to 2019.

Authors:  Nicholas Yue Shuen Yoon; Yun Ting Ong; Hong Wei Yap; Kuang Teck Tay; Elijah Gin Lim; Clarissa Wei Shuen Cheong; Wei Qiang Lim; Annelissa Mien Chew Chin; Ying Pin Toh; Min Chiam; Stephen Mason; Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Central institutional ethics committee needed to facilitate timely review of multicenter clinical trials.

Authors:  B S Desai; A S Dixit; V S Gota
Journal:  J Postgrad Med       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.476

6.  Perspectives of Singaporean biomedical researchers and research support staff on actual and ideal IRB review functions and characteristics: A quantitative analysis.

Authors:  Markus K Labude; Liang Shen; Yujia Zhu; G Owen Schaefer; Catherine Ong; Vicki Xafis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Performance of IRBs in China: a survey on IRB employees and researchers' experiences and perceptions.

Authors:  Xing Liu; Ying Wu; Min Yang; Yang Li; Kaveh Khoshnood; Esther Luo; Lun Li; Xiaomin Wang
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 2.834

8.  Prioritizing Initiatives for Institutional Review Board (IRB) Quality Improvement.

Authors:  Daniel E Hall; Ulrike Feske; Barbara H Hanusa; Bruce S Ling; Roslyn A Stone; Shasha Gao; Galen E Switzer; Aram Dobalian; Michael J Fine; Robert M Arnold
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2016-06-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.