Literature DB >> 26527344

Farm and product carbon footprints of China's fruit production--life cycle inventory of representative orchards of five major fruits.

Ming Yan1, Kun Cheng1, Qian Yue1, Yu Yan1, Robert M Rees2, Genxing Pan3,4,5.   

Abstract

Understanding the environmental impacts of fruit production will provide fundamental information for policy making of fruit consumption and marketing. This study aims to characterize the carbon footprints of China's fruit production and to figure out the key greenhouse gas emissions to cut with improved orchard management. Yearly input data of materials and energy in a full life cycle from material production to fruit harvest were obtained via field visits to orchards of five typical fruit types from selected areas of China. Carbon footprint (CF) was assessed with quantifying the greenhouse gas emissions associated with the individual inputs. Farm and product CFs were respectively predicted in terms of land use and of fresh fruit yield. Additionally, product CFs scaled by fruit nutrition value (vitamin C (Vc) content) and by the economic benefit from fruit production were also evaluated. The estimated farm CF ranged from 2.9 to 12.8 t CO2-eq ha(-1) across the surveyed orchards, whereas the product CF ranged from 0.07 to 0.7 kg CO2-eq kg(-1) fruit. While the mean product CFs of orange and pear were significantly lower than those of apple, banana, and peach, the nutrition-scaled CF of orange (0.5 kg CO2-eq g(-1) Vc on average) was significantly lower than others (3.0-5.9 kg CO2-eq g(-1) Vc). The income-scaled CF of orange and pear (1.20 and 1.01 kg CO2-eq USD(-1), respectively) was higher than apple, banana, and peach (0.87~0.39 kg CO2-eq USD(-1)). Among the inputs, synthetic nitrogen fertilizer contributed by over 50 % to the total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, varying among the fruit types. There were some tradeoffs in product CFs between fruit nutrition value and fruit growers' income. Low carbon production and consumption policy and marketing mechanism should be developed to cut down carbon emissions from fruit production sector, with balancing the nutrition value, producer's income, and climate change mitigation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbon footprint; Fruit production; Greenhouse gas emissions; Life cycle assessment; Low carbon management; N fertilizer; Orchard

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26527344     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-5670-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  8 in total

Review 1.  Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices.

Authors:  David Tilman; Kenneth G Cassman; Pamela A Matson; Rosamond Naylor; Stephen Polasky
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-08-08       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification.

Authors:  Jennifer A Burney; Steven J Davis; David B Lobell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture.

Authors:  Pete Smith; Daniel Martino; Zucong Cai; Daniel Gwary; Henry Janzen; Pushpam Kumar; Bruce McCarl; Stephen Ogle; Frank O'Mara; Charles Rice; Bob Scholes; Oleg Sirotenko; Mark Howden; Tim McAllister; Genxing Pan; Vladimir Romanenkov; Uwe Schneider; Sirintornthep Towprayoon; Martin Wattenbach; Jo Smith
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  [Assessment on the availability of nitrogen fertilization in improving carbon sequestration potential of China's cropland soil].

Authors:  Fei Lu; Xiao-Ke Wang; Bing Han; Zhi-Yun Ouyang; Xiao-Nan Duan; Hua Zheng
Journal:  Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao       Date:  2008-10

5.  Nitrogen balance and groundwater nitrate contamination: comparison among three intensive cropping systems on the North China Plain.

Authors:  X T Ju; C L Kou; F S Zhang; P Christie
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 8.071

6.  A comparative study on carbon footprint of rice production between household and aggregated farms from Jiangxi, China.

Authors:  Ming Yan; Ting Luo; Rongjun Bian; Kun Cheng; Genxing Pan; Robert Rees
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  New technologies reduce greenhouse gas emissions from nitrogenous fertilizer in China.

Authors:  Wei-Feng Zhang; Zheng-Xia Dou; Pan He; Xiao-Tang Ju; David Powlson; Dave Chadwick; David Norse; Yue-Lai Lu; Ying Zhang; Liang Wu; Xin-Ping Chen; Kenneth G Cassman; Fu-Suo Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Life cycle inventory and carbon and water FoodPrint of fruits and vegetables: application to a Swiss retailer.

Authors:  Franziska Stoessel; Ronnie Juraske; Stephan Pfister; Stefanie Hellweg
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Energy Consumption, Carbon Emissions and Global Warming Potential of Wolfberry Production in Jingtai Oasis, Gansu Province, China.

Authors:  Yaolin Wang; Quanlin Ma; Yingke Li; Tao Sun; Hujia Jin; Chuanyan Zhao; Eleanor Milne; Mark Easter; Keith Paustian; Hoi Wen Au Yong; John McDonagh
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Carbon Footprint Reduction by Transitioning to a Diet Consistent with the Danish Climate-Friendly Dietary Guidelines: A Comparison of Different Carbon Footprint Databases.

Authors:  Ellen Trolle; Matilda Nordman; Anne Dahl Lassen; Tracey A Colley; Lisbeth Mogensen
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-04-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.