Literature DB >> 26524587

Dishonesty in scientific research.

Nina Mazar, Dan Ariely.   

Abstract

Fraudulent business practices, such as those leading to the Enron scandal and the conviction of Bernard Madoff, evoke a strong sense of public outrage. But fraudulent or dishonest actions are not exclusive to the realm of big corporations or to evil individuals without consciences. Dishonest actions are all too prevalent in everyone's daily lives, because people are constantly encountering situations in which they can gain advantages by cutting corners. Whether it's adding a few dollars in value to the stolen items reported on an insurance claim form or dropping outlier data points from a figure to make a paper sound more interesting, dishonesty is part of the human condition. Here, we explore how people rationalize dishonesty, the implications for scientific research, and what can be done to foster a culture of research integrity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26524587      PMCID: PMC4639975          DOI: 10.1172/JCI84722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Invest        ISSN: 0021-9738            Impact factor:   14.808


  9 in total

1.  Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling.

Authors:  Leslie K John; George Loewenstein; Drazen Prelec
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-04-16

2.  The unintended consequences of conflict of interest disclosure.

Authors:  George Loewenstein; Sunita Sah; Daylian M Cain
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses: With this method the dangers of parental affection for a favorite theory can be circumvented.

Authors:  T C Chamberlin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-05-07       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Greasing the palm: can collectivism promote bribery?

Authors:  Nina Mazar; Pankaj Aggarwal
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-06-17

5.  Conflicts of interest: part 1: Reconnecting the dots--reinterpreting industry-physician relations.

Authors:  Lisa Rosenbaum
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  The importance of being transparent.

Authors:  Sarah Jackson
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Signing at the beginning makes ethics salient and decreases dishonest self-reports in comparison to signing at the end.

Authors:  Lisa L Shu; Nina Mazar; Francesca Gino; Dan Ariely; Max H Bazerman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The burden of disclosure: increased compliance with distrusted advice.

Authors:  Sunita Sah; George Loewenstein; Daylian M Cain
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2012-10-22

9.  All preclinical trials should be registered in advance in an online registry.

Authors:  Sanne J Jansen of Lorkeers; Pieter A Doevendans; Steven A J Chamuleau
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.686

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Gating the holes in the Swiss cheese (part I): Expanding professor Reason's model for patient safety.

Authors:  Shashi S Seshia; G Bryan Young; Michael Makhinson; Preston A Smith; Kent Stobart; Pat Croskerry
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 2.431

2.  Ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: results from a survey among participants of four World Conferences on Research Integrity.

Authors:  Lex M Bouter; Joeri Tijdink; Nils Axelsen; Brian C Martinson; Gerben Ter Riet
Journal:  Res Integr Peer Rev       Date:  2016-11-21

3.  Testing an active intervention to deter researchers' use of questionable research practices.

Authors:  S V Bruton; M Brown; D F Sacco; R Didlake
Journal:  Res Integr Peer Rev       Date:  2019-11-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.