Literature DB >> 26523910

High-Signal Intensity in the Dentate Nucleus and Globus Pallidus on Unenhanced T1-Weighted Images: Evaluation of the Macrocyclic Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent Gadobutrol.

Alexander Radbruch1, Lukas D Weberling, Pascal J Kieslich, Johanna Hepp, Philipp Kickingereder, Wolfgang Wick, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Martin Bendszus.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare changes in the signal intensity (SI) ratio of the dentate nucleus (DN) to the pons, DN to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and globus pallidus (GP) to thalamus on unenhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans after serial injections of the macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent gadobutrol.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients who had received at least 5 MRI examinations (plus an additional last MRI for reference) with the exclusive use of gadobutrol, resulting in a total cumulative dose of 54.1 ± 30.4 mL gadobutrol, were analyzed retrospectively. Signal intensity ratio differences were calculated for DN-to-pons, DN-to-CSF, and GP-to-thalamus ratios by subtracting the SI ratio at the first MRI from the SI ratio at the last MRI scan. One-sample t tests were employed to examine if they differed from 0. Regression and correlational analyses were performed to examine whether the SI ratio differences were predicted by a number of control variables.
RESULTS: Signal intensity ratio differences did not differ significantly from 0, neither for the DN-to-pons ratio (-0.0035 ± 0.0476, P = 0.69), the DN-to-CSF ratio (-0.0539 ± 0.3217, P = 0.37), nor the GP-to-thalamus ratio (-0.0020 ± 0.0211, P = 0.60). None of the control variables predicted changes in SI ratios.
CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to a recently published study, we did not find signal increases in the DN or in the GP after serial injections of gadobutrol, even though the total dose applied here was considerably larger than in the respective study. This finding adds further support to the hypothesis that the molecular structure of a gadolinium-based contrast agent as either macrocyclic or linear is a crucial factor for its potential to cause gadolinium deposition in the brain. Future studies should further assess this hypothesis by additional animal investigations as well as histopathological and clinical correlation studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26523910     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  72 in total

Review 1.  The biological fate of gadolinium-based MRI contrast agents: a call to action for bioinorganic chemists.

Authors:  Mariane Le Fur; Peter Caravan
Journal:  Metallomics       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 4.526

2.  Gadolinium deposition in the brain: association with various GBCAs using a generalized additive model.

Authors:  Sohi Bae; Ho-Joon Lee; Kyunghwa Han; Yae-Won Park; Yoon Seong Choi; Sung Soo Ahn; Jinna Kim; Seung-Koo Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Signal intensity change on unenhanced T1-weighted images in dentate nucleus following gadobenate dimeglumine in patients with and without previous multiple administrations of gadodiamide.

Authors:  Joana Ramalho; Richard C Semelka; Mamdoh AlObaidy; Miguel Ramalho; Renato H Nunes; Mauricio Castillo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Effects of serial macrocyclic-based contrast materials gadoterate meglumine and gadobutrol administrations on gadolinium-related dentate nuclei signal increases in unenhanced T1-weighted brain: a retrospective study in 158 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.

Authors:  Alessandra Splendiani; Marco Perri; Claudia Marsecano; Valentina Vellucci; Giulia Michelini; Antonio Barile; Ernesto Di Cesare
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Signal intensity increases in dentate nucleus/globus pallidus/pulvinar on unenhanced T1WI MR images after multiple examinations with gadodiamide.

Authors:  Takao Koiso; Masaaki Yamamoto; Shinya Watanabe; Bierta E Barfod
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2019-03-29

Review 6.  Distribution and chemical forms of gadolinium in the brain: a review.

Authors:  Tomonori Kanda; Yudai Nakai; Akifumi Hagiwara; Hiroshi Oba; Keiko Toyoda; Shigeru Furui
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  Gadolinium retention in the body: what we know and what we can do.

Authors:  Enrico Tedeschi; Ferdinando Caranci; Flavio Giordano; Valentina Angelini; Sirio Cocozza; Arturo Brunetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 8.  Is MRI imaging in pediatric age totally safe? A critical reprisal.

Authors:  Sergio Salerno; Claudio Granata; Marco Trapenese; Vittorio Cannata; Davide Curione; Maria Camilla Rossi Espagnet; Andrea Magistrelli; Paolo Tomà
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 9.  Gadolinium-based contrast agents in children.

Authors:  Michael N Rozenfeld; Daniel J Podberesky
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-08-04

Review 10.  Chemistry of MRI Contrast Agents: Current Challenges and New Frontiers.

Authors:  Jessica Wahsner; Eric M Gale; Aurora Rodríguez-Rodríguez; Peter Caravan
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 60.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.