Literature DB >> 26521932

Impact of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea on acute care length of stay, hospital costs, and readmission: A multicenter retrospective study of inpatients, 2009-2011.

Glenn Magee1, Marcie E Strauss2, Sheila M Thomas2, Harold Brown3, Dorothy Baumer3, Kelly C Broderick4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The recent epidemiologic changes of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) have resulted in substantial economic burden to U.S. acute care hospitals. Past studies evaluating CDAD-attributable costs have been geographically and demographically limited. Here, we describe CDAD-attributable burden in inpatients, overall, and in vulnerable subpopulations from the Premier hospital database, a large, diverse cohort with a wide range of high-risk subgroups.
METHODS: Discharges from the Premier database were retrospectively analyzed to assess length of stay (LOS), total inpatient costs, readmission, and inpatient mortality.
RESULTS: Patients with CDAD had significantly worse outcomes than matched controls in terms of total LOS, rates of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and inpatient mortality. After adjustment for risk factors, patients with CDAD had increased odds of inpatient mortality, total and ICU LOS, costs, and odds of 30-, 60- and 90-day all-cause readmission versus non-CDAD patients. CDAD-attributable costs were higher in all studied vulnerable subpopulations, which also had increased odds of 30-, 60- and 90-day all-cause readmission than those without CDAD.
CONCLUSION: Given the significant economic impact CDAD has on hospitals, prevention of initial episodes and targeted therapy to prevent recurrences in vulnerable patients are essential to decrease the overall burden to hospitals.
Copyright © 2015 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clostridium difficile; Clostridium difficile infection; Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea; Cost; Length of stay; Readmission

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26521932     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  19 in total

1.  Antibiotic Exposure and Risk for Hospital-Associated Clostridioides difficile Infection.

Authors:  Brandon J Webb; Aruna Subramanian; Bert Lopansri; Bruce Goodman; Peter Bjorn Jones; Jeffrey Ferraro; Edward Stenehjem; Samuel M Brown
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Inpatient Expenditures Attributable to Hospital-Onset Clostridium difficile Infection: A Nationwide Case-Control Study in Japan.

Authors:  Haruhisa Fukuda; Takahisa Yano; Nobuyuki Shimono
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  The incremental cost of infections associated with multidrug-resistant organisms in the inpatient hospital setting-A national estimate.

Authors:  Kenton J Johnston; Kenneth E Thorpe; Jesse T Jacob; David J Murphy
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Driven Protocol to Reduce Inappropriate Use of Acid-Suppressive Medications In the Non-ICU Setting.

Authors:  Tracey L Mersfelder; Chris Jacob; Jason K Lam; Kevin J Kavanaugh; Christin M Molnar
Journal:  P T       Date:  2019-08

5.  Detection of Newly Secreted Antibodies Predicts Nonrecurrence in Primary Clostridioides difficile Infection.

Authors:  F Eun-Hyung Lee; John L Daiss; Natalie S Haddad; Sophia Nozick; Geena Kim; Shant Ohanian; Colleen S Kraft; Paulina A Rebolledo; Yun Wang; Hao Wu; Adam Bressler; Sang Nguyet Thi Le; Merin Kuruvilla; Martin C Runnstrom; Richard P Ramonell; L Edward Cannon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 11.677

Review 6.  A Comparison of Current Guidelines of Five International Societies on Clostridium difficile Infection Management.

Authors:  Csaba Fehér; Josep Mensa
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2016-07-28

7.  A randomized controlled pilot study to evaluate the effect of an enteral formulation designed to improve gastrointestinal tolerance in the critically ill patient-the SPIRIT trial.

Authors:  Stephan M Jakob; Lukas Bütikofer; David Berger; Michael Coslovsky; Jukka Takala
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Efficacy and safety of ridinilazole compared with vancomycin for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority study.

Authors:  Richard J Vickers; Glenn S Tillotson; Richard Nathan; Sabine Hazan; John Pullman; Christopher Lucasti; Kenneth Deck; Bruce Yacyshyn; Benedict Maliakkal; Yves Pesant; Bina Tejura; David Roblin; Dale N Gerding; Mark H Wilcox
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 25.071

9.  Risk factors for Clostridium difficile infection in surgical patients hospitalized in a tertiary hospital in Belgrade, Serbia: a case-control study.

Authors:  Vesna Šuljagić; Ivan Miljković; Srđan Starčević; Nenad Stepić; Zoran Kostić; Dragutin Jovanović; Jelena Brusić-Renaud; Biljana Mijović; Sandra Šipetić-Grujičić
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 4.887

10.  Cost savings following faecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Emilie Dehlholm-Lambertsen; Bianca K Hall; Simon M D Jørgensen; Christine W Jørgensen; Mia E Jensen; Sara Larsen; Josephine S Jensen; Lars Ehlers; Jens F Dahlerup; Christian L Hvas
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 4.409

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.