Glenn Magee1, Marcie E Strauss2, Sheila M Thomas2, Harold Brown3, Dorothy Baumer3, Kelly C Broderick4. 1. Premier Research Services, Charlotte, NC. Electronic address: glenn_magee@premierinc.com. 2. Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Optimer Pharmaceuticals, Jersey City, NJ. 3. Premier Research Services, Charlotte, NC. 4. Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The recent epidemiologic changes of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) have resulted in substantial economic burden to U.S. acute care hospitals. Past studies evaluating CDAD-attributable costs have been geographically and demographically limited. Here, we describe CDAD-attributable burden in inpatients, overall, and in vulnerable subpopulations from the Premier hospital database, a large, diverse cohort with a wide range of high-risk subgroups. METHODS: Discharges from the Premier database were retrospectively analyzed to assess length of stay (LOS), total inpatient costs, readmission, and inpatient mortality. RESULTS: Patients with CDAD had significantly worse outcomes than matched controls in terms of total LOS, rates of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and inpatient mortality. After adjustment for risk factors, patients with CDAD had increased odds of inpatient mortality, total and ICU LOS, costs, and odds of 30-, 60- and 90-day all-cause readmission versus non-CDAD patients. CDAD-attributable costs were higher in all studied vulnerable subpopulations, which also had increased odds of 30-, 60- and 90-day all-cause readmission than those without CDAD. CONCLUSION: Given the significant economic impact CDAD has on hospitals, prevention of initial episodes and targeted therapy to prevent recurrences in vulnerable patients are essential to decrease the overall burden to hospitals.
BACKGROUND: The recent epidemiologic changes of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) have resulted in substantial economic burden to U.S. acute care hospitals. Past studies evaluating CDAD-attributable costs have been geographically and demographically limited. Here, we describe CDAD-attributable burden in inpatients, overall, and in vulnerable subpopulations from the Premier hospital database, a large, diverse cohort with a wide range of high-risk subgroups. METHODS: Discharges from the Premier database were retrospectively analyzed to assess length of stay (LOS), total inpatient costs, readmission, and inpatient mortality. RESULTS:Patients with CDAD had significantly worse outcomes than matched controls in terms of total LOS, rates of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and inpatient mortality. After adjustment for risk factors, patients with CDAD had increased odds of inpatient mortality, total and ICU LOS, costs, and odds of 30-, 60- and 90-day all-cause readmission versus non-CDADpatients. CDAD-attributable costs were higher in all studied vulnerable subpopulations, which also had increased odds of 30-, 60- and 90-day all-cause readmission than those without CDAD. CONCLUSION: Given the significant economic impact CDAD has on hospitals, prevention of initial episodes and targeted therapy to prevent recurrences in vulnerable patients are essential to decrease the overall burden to hospitals.
Authors: Brandon J Webb; Aruna Subramanian; Bert Lopansri; Bruce Goodman; Peter Bjorn Jones; Jeffrey Ferraro; Edward Stenehjem; Samuel M Brown Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2020-03-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: F Eun-Hyung Lee; John L Daiss; Natalie S Haddad; Sophia Nozick; Geena Kim; Shant Ohanian; Colleen S Kraft; Paulina A Rebolledo; Yun Wang; Hao Wu; Adam Bressler; Sang Nguyet Thi Le; Merin Kuruvilla; Martin C Runnstrom; Richard P Ramonell; L Edward Cannon Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2022-03-16 Impact factor: 11.677
Authors: Richard J Vickers; Glenn S Tillotson; Richard Nathan; Sabine Hazan; John Pullman; Christopher Lucasti; Kenneth Deck; Bruce Yacyshyn; Benedict Maliakkal; Yves Pesant; Bina Tejura; David Roblin; Dale N Gerding; Mark H Wilcox Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2017-04-28 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Emilie Dehlholm-Lambertsen; Bianca K Hall; Simon M D Jørgensen; Christine W Jørgensen; Mia E Jensen; Sara Larsen; Josephine S Jensen; Lars Ehlers; Jens F Dahlerup; Christian L Hvas Journal: Therap Adv Gastroenterol Date: 2019-04-10 Impact factor: 4.409