Literature DB >> 26521061

New ASCO/CAP guideline recommendations for HER2 testing increase the proportion of reflex in situ hybridization tests and of HER2 positive breast cancers.

N Tchrakian1, L Flanagan2, J Harford3, J M Gannon4, C M Quinn5,6.   

Abstract

Accurate determination of tumour human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) status is critical for optimal treatment of breast cancer. In October 2013, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP) issued joint updated guideline recommendations for HER2 testing in breast cancer, with a revised algorithm for interpretation of immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridisation (ISH) results. This study investigates the impact on HER2 IHC categorisation, implication for reflex ISH testing and potential for identification of false negative IHC. HER2 IHC preparations on 251 invasive breast tumours, originally reported according to 2007 guidelines, were re-scored using 2013 guidelines and the diagnostic categories compared. The results of ISH testing on a separate cohort of 32 breast tumours reported as HER2 IHC 2+ following the introduction of the 2013 guidelines, that would have been designated 1+ according to 2007, were reviewed. Application of 2013 guidelines resulted in a decrease in tumours classified as HER2 negative (83/251 vs 144/251) and a comparable increase in those classified as equivocal (2+) (139/251 vs 80/251). Relatively few tumours were re-classified as positive (29/251 vs 27/251). Furthermore, 3/32 breast cancer cases (HER2 IHC 2+ as per 2013 guidelines, 1+ using 2007 guidelines) were HER2 ISH positive. Application of the 2013 guidelines increases the HER2 IHC equivocal (2+) category and requirement for reflex ISH testing. The reduced threshold for ISH testing identifies some patients with HER2 positive breast cancer whose tumours would have been categorised as HER2 negative according to the 2007 guidelines.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ASCO/CAP guidelines; Breast cancer; Equivocal category; HER2 immunohistochemistry; Reflex in situ hybridisation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26521061     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-015-1871-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  14 in total

1.  Breast cancer: updated guideline recommendations for HER2 testing.

Authors:  Emad A Rakha; Ian O Ellis
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Reply to E.A. Rakha et al.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; David G Hicks; Kimberly H Allison; John M S Bartlett; Michael Bilous; Patrick Fitzgibbons; Wedad Hanna; Robert B Jenkins; Pamela B Mangu; Soonmyung Paik; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Patricia A Spears; Gail H Vance; Giuseppe Viale; Mitch Dowsett; Lisa M McShane; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  HER2 in breast cancer: a review and update.

Authors:  Uma Krishnamurti; Jan F Silverman
Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.875

4.  2013 update of the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing: impact on immunohistochemistry-negative breast cancers.

Authors:  Kathleen Lambein; Mieke Van Bockstal; Hannelore Denys; Louis Libbrecht
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Interpretation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in situ hybridization assays using 2013 update of American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists HER2 Guidelines.

Authors:  Rohit Bhargava; David J Dabbs
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  The economic value of innovative treatments over the product life cycle: the case of targeted trastuzumab therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Louis P Garrison; David L Veenstra
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 7.  HER2 testing: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Edith A Perez; Javier Cortés; Ana Maria Gonzalez-Angulo; John M S Bartlett
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 12.111

8.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Jared N Schwartz; Karen L Hagerty; D Craig Allred; Richard J Cote; Mitchell Dowsett; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Wedad M Hanna; Amy Langer; Lisa M McShane; Soonmyung Paik; Mark D Pegram; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Anthony Rhodes; Catharine Sturgeon; Sheila E Taube; Raymond Tubbs; Gail H Vance; Marc van de Vijver; Thomas M Wheeler; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.534

9.  Updated UK Recommendations for HER2 assessment in breast cancer.

Authors:  Emad A Rakha; Sarah E Pinder; John M S Bartlett; Merdol Ibrahim; Jane Starczynski; Pauline J Carder; Elena Provenzano; Andrew Hanby; Sally Hales; Andrew H S Lee; Ian O Ellis
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 screening tests for breast cancer suggested by the new updated recommendation of the american society of clinical oncology/college of american pathologists will involve a rise of the in-situ hybridization tests for the European laboratories of pathology.

Authors:  Christian Garbar; Aude-Marie Savoye; Corinne Mascaux; Eva Brabencova; Hervé Curé
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2014-04-22
View more
  9 in total

1.  Obesity and survival in the neoadjuvant breast cancer setting: role of tumor subtype in an ethnically diverse population.

Authors:  Ying L Liu; Anurag Saraf; Benjamin Catanese; Shing M Lee; Yuan Zhang; Eileen P Connolly; Kevin Kalinsky
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Concurrent use of capecitabine with radiation therapy and survival in breast cancer (BC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Y L Liu; C Chin; B Catanese; S M Lee; S Zhan; K Kalinsky; E P Connolly
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Phase II study of propranolol feasibility with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  Madeleine B Hopson; Shing Lee; Melissa Accordino; Meghna Trivedi; Matthew Maurer; Katherine D Crew; Dawn L Hershman; Kevin Kalinsky
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Lymphovascular invasion is an independent predictor of survival in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ying L Liu; Anurag Saraf; Shing M Lee; Xiaobo Zhong; Hanina Hibshoosh; Kevin Kalinsky; Eileen P Connolly
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Relationship between HER2 gene status and selected potential biological features related to trastuzumab resistance and its influence on survival of breast cancer patients undergoing trastuzumab adjuvant treatment.

Authors:  Agnieszka Adamczyk; Anna Kruczak; Agnieszka Harazin-Lechowska; Aleksandra Ambicka; Aleksandra Grela-Wojewoda; Małgorzata Domagała-Haduch; Anna Janecka-Widła; Kaja Majchrzyk; Anna Cichocka; Janusz Ryś; Joanna Niemiec
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  A decision tree-based prediction model for fluorescence in situ hybridization HER2 gene status in HER2 immunohistochemistry-2+ breast cancers: a 2538-case multicenter study on consecutive surgical specimens.

Authors:  Libo Yang; Zhang Zhang; Jiayuan Li; Min Chen; Jieliang Yang; Jing Fu; Hong Bu; Shaoxian Tang; Yueping Liu; Huixiang Li; Xiaomei Li; Fangping Xu; Xiaodong Teng; Yinghong Yang; Yun Ma; Shuangping Guo; Jinfen Wang; Deyu Guo
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 4.207

7.  Expression of ICOSL is associated with decreased survival in invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Huayong Jiang; Tingyang Zhou; Ning Ma; Wei Liu; Yajie Wang; Li Zuo
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Pre-diagnostic statin use, lymph node status and mortality in women with stages I-III breast cancer.

Authors:  Amelia Smith; Laura Murphy; Lina Zgaga; Thomas I Barron; Kathleen Bennett
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  HER2 overexpression and correlation with other significant clinicopathologic parameters in Ivorian breast cancer women.

Authors:  Nguiessan Alphonse Aman; Brahima Doukoure; Kouadio Donatien Koffi; Baumaney Sylvanus Koui; Zie Cheick Traore; Mohamed Kouyate; Ahoua Benjamin Effi
Journal:  BMC Clin Pathol       Date:  2019-01-17
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.