| Literature DB >> 26520587 |
Yeon-Ho Kang1, Sujeong Park2, Chihyun Ahn3, Jinsoo Song4, Dongkyun Kim5, Eun-Jung Jin6,7.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Glucosamine is widely used to improve the symptoms and to delay the structural progression of osteoarthritis. However, its efficacy in osteoarthritis has been controversial and its underlying mechanism of action remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of glucosamine and the underlying mechanisms in human chondrocytes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26520587 PMCID: PMC4628363 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-015-0176-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Med Res ISSN: 0949-2321 Impact factor: 2.175
Fig. 1Effect of glucosamine in human normal chondrocytes. a Normal chondrocytes were cultured as a pellet and stained with Alcian blue at day 9 and the expression levels of COMP and ACAN were analyzed by qRT-PCR to check chondrogenic characteristics (left panel). Normal human chondrocytes were left untreated or were treated with 10, 50 or 100 mM glucosamine for 24 h. A dose-dependent change in the cell morphology was detected by phase-contrast microscopy (right panel). b RNA levels of MMP-13 and ADAMTS4 were analyzed by qRT-PCR. Cells were analyzed by c Muse™ Annexin V and Dead Cell assay and d Muse™ Mitopotential assay. Bars show the mean ± SD of three individual experiments. *P < 0.05 versus control (untreated)
Fig. 2Effect of glucosamine on peroxisomal function. Normal human chondrocytes were left untreated or were treated with 10, 50, or 100 mM glucosamine for 24 h. a Cells were stained with BODIPY 493/503 and PMP70. b The RNA levels of PMP70 and ACOX1 were analyzed by qRT-PCR. *P < 0.05 versus control (untreated)
Lipidomics of glucosamine-treated chondrocytes
| Control | Glucosamine 10 mM | Glucosamine 50 mM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | % | Name | % | Name | % |
| Nonahexacontanoic acid | 0.07 | Nonahexacontanoic acid | 0.042 | 0.125 | |
| Tetratetracontane | 0.21 | Glycerol tristearate | 0.518 | Nonahexacontanoic acid | 0.17 |
| Hentriacontane | 0.04 | Cholesta-3,5-diene | 0.304 | Benzenepropanoic acid,3,5-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-hydroxy- | 0.197 |
| Cholesta-3,5-diene | 0.12 | 2,4,6-Triphenyl-1-hexene-D5 | 3.155 | Cholesta-3,5-diene | 0.124 |
| Hexacosane | 0.07 | Docosane | 0.393 | Tetracosane | 2.598 |
| 2,4,6-Triphenyl-1-hexene | 3.09 | rac Methadone | 0.288 | Dioctyl terephthalate | 2.483 |
| tricosane | 0.08 | Eicosane | 5.42 | 2,4,6-Triphenyl-1-hexene-D5 | 0.28 |
| Docosane | 0.5 | Eicosanoic acid | 0.849 | Docosane | 13.003 |
|
| 0.14 | Methyl arachidonate | 0.122 | Erucylamide | 0.612 |
| Octadecanoic acid 2,3-dihydroxypropyl ester | 0.59 | (S)-(E)-(-)-4-acetoxy-1-phenyl-2-dodecen-1-one | 0.046 | Glycerol b-monostearate | 0.06 |
| Nonadecyl trifluoroacetate | 0.06 | 1-Nonadecanol | 0.196 | 1-Dodecanol, 2-octyl- eicosane | 1.733 |
| Eicosane | 3.32 | 2-Hexadecanoyl glycerol | 0.877 | 5,8,11,14,17-Eicosatetraenoic acid | 0.152 |
| Eicosanoic acid | 0.83 | Methyl linoleate | 0.112 | Nonadecane | 0.08 |
| Arachidonic acid | 0.41 | Octadecanoic acid | 1.746 | 2-Hexadecanoyl glycerol | 1.397 |
| 5,8,11,14,17-Eicosapentaenoic acid | 0.09 | 1-Octadecene | 0.115 | 1-Nonadecene | 0.094 |
| Hexadecanoic acid,2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl) ethyl ester | 1.39 | 9-Octadecenamide, (Z)- | 4.827 | Octadecanoic acid | 1.556 |
| Methyl 9-(Z)-octadecenoate | 1.12 | 11-Octadecenoic acid,(11Z)- | 0.094 | 9-Octadecenamide, (Z)- | 0.91 |
| 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-, methyl ester | 0.31 | Palmitic acid | 1.343 | Linoleic acid | 0.141 |
| Thiocarbamic acid | 0.28 | 2-Propenoic caid, tridecyl ester | 0.465 | 11-Octadecenoic acid,(11Z)- | 0.386 |
| Octadecane | 0.15 | Hypogeic acid | 0.35 |
| 0.091 |
| Stearic acid | 2.21 | [2.2]Paracyclophane | 0.059 | Pentafluoropropionic acid tetradecyl ester | 0.136 |
| 1-Octadecene | 0.11 | 3-Methyl-2-benzylindole | 4.12 | 2-Ethylhexyl methyl isophthalate | 0.065 |
| 9-Octadecenamide, (Z)- | 5.98 | 2,4-Diphenyl-1-butene-D5 | 0.437 | 1-Decanol,2-hexyl- | 0.059 |
| Heptafluorobutyric acid, | 0.18 | 1-Pentadecene | 0.129 | Hexadecane | 0.142 |
| Methyl hexadecanoate | 1.68 | 2-Methyl-1-anthracenamine | 6.432 | Palmitic acid | 1.374 |
| Cyclopentolate | 0.14 | 1-Methyl-2-anthracenamine | 2.094 | Benzene,1,1′-(1,2-cyclobutanediyl)bis-, | 0.28 |
| Fumaric acid, 2-ethylhexyl hexyl ester | 0.11 | Tetradecane | 0.125 | 3-Methyl-2-benzylindole | 5.108 |
| Hexadecane | 0.07 | 2-Tetradecene | 0.162 | 2,4-Diphenyl-1-butene-D5 | 0.337 |
| Hexadecanoic acid | 0.33 | Phenol,2,5-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)- | 0.079 | 1,3-diphenyl-cyclobutane | 0.06 |
| 2-Propenoic acid, tridecyl ester | 1.41 | 5-Methoxy-2-methyl-1-propyl-1H-indole-3-carboxylic acid | 0.451 | Propanoic acid, 3-mercapto-, dodecyl ester | 0.234 |
| 2,4-Diphenyl-1-butene | 0.47 | Dodecahydropyrido[1,2-b]isoquinolin-6-one | 0.053 | 2-Methyl-1-anthracenamine | 5.093 |
| Benzene,1,1′-(1,2-cyclobutanediyl)bis-, | 0.37 | Sulfurous acid, dodecyl 2-propyl ester | 0.155 | 1H-Indole,2-methyl-3-phenyl- | 1.934 |
| 3-Methyl-2-benzylindole | 4.11 | Dodecane | 0.115 | 2-Ethylacridin | 0.553 |
| Cyclobutane,1,3-diphenyl-, | 0.06 | Cyclododecane | 0.12 | Benzo[h]quinoline,2,4-dimethyl- | 0.113 |
| Propanoic acid,3-mercapto-, dodecyl ester | 0.66 | 1-Methyl-5,6-dimethoxy-2,3-dihydroindole | 2.373 | Tridecane, 6-methyl- | 0.164 |
| Benzene,1,1′-(1,3-propanediyl)bis- | 0.07 | 2,7-Naphthalenedisulfonicacid, 3-hydroxy-4-nitroso- | 0.37 | Tetradecane | 0.084 |
| 1-Methyl-2-anthracenamine | 4.45 | 1-Decene | 0.191 | 2,4-Di-tert-butylphenol | 0.094 |
| 1-Tetradecanol | 0.24 | 2-Methylmercaptobenzothiazole | 0.498 | Benzene,1,3-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)- | 0.152 |
| Tetradecane | 0.12 | 1,4-Benzenedicarboxylic acid | 3.412 | 12-Hydroxydodecanoic acid | 0.224 |
| 2,4-Di-tert-butylphenol | 0.13 | Benzene | 0.19 | 2-Propenoic acid oxybis(methyl-2,1-ethanediyl) ester | 0.699 |
| 2-Tridecanone | 0.17 | Fumaric acid | 0.08 | Ethyl 4-etoxybenzoate | 0.074 |
| Dodecahydropyrido[1,2-b]isoquinolin-6-one | 0.06 | 2-Chloropropionic acid | 0.069 | Cycl zodecane | 0.249 |
| Decane, 2, 3, 5-trimethyl | 0.16 | exo-5-hydroxy-exo-2,3,3a,4,5,6,7,7a-octahydro-4,7-methano-1H-indene | 0.079 | ||
| 1-Dodecanol | 0.1 | S,S′-Bis(2-dimethylaminoethyl) methylphosphonodithioate | 0.063 | ||
| 2-Carbomethoxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene | 0.09 | ||||
| 2-Undecanone | 0.11 | ||||
| 4-Ethoxybenzoic acid ethyl ester | 0.11 | ||||
| 5-Acetyl-2-methoxyphenyl-1-thiocyanate | 0.55 | ||||
| 3,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde thiocarbamoylhydrazone | 0.05 | ||||
| 2-Methylmercaptobenzothiazole | 0.16 | ||||
| Terephthalic acid | 3.32 | ||||
| octanoic acid | 0.09 | ||||
| 2-Xylene-D10 | 0.11 | ||||
| Benzene | 0.14 | ||||
| Carbonochloridic acid, decyl ester | 0.16 | ||||
Fig. 3Effect of glucosamine on VLCFA. a Normal human chondrocytes were left untreated or were treated with 10 and 50 mM glucosamine for 24 h. Total lipid was analyzed using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and divided into LLCFA, LCFA, MCFA, and SCFA. b Normal human chondrocytes were left untreated or were treated with lignoceric acid (VLCFA) for 24 h and cell morphologies were assessed by phase-contrast microscopy (upper panel). RNA levels of MMP-13 were analyzed by qRT-PCR (lower panel). c RNA levels of pro-apoptotic genes were analyzed by qRT-PCR and presented as heat-map. Red color represented as significant increase in expression levels. Apoptotic cell populations were analyzed by FACS. Bars show the mean ± SD of three individual experiments. *P < 0.05 versus control (untreated)
Fig. 4Effect of glucosamine on autophagy in human normal chondrocytes. Normal human chondrocytes were treated with 50 mM glucosamine and the RNA levels of a pro-apoptotic genes and b autophagy-related genes were analyzed by qRT-PCR and expressed as a heat-map and value of relative quantity (RQ). c Normal human chondrocytes were treated with 10, 50, or 100 mM glucosamine in the absence or presence of MG132 and the dose-dependent change in protein levels of beclin and LC3B was detected by immunoblotting. GAPDH was used as a loading control. d Normal human chondrocytes were treated with 50 mM glucosamine and pexophagy was examined by introducing an mRFP-EGFR-SKL construct. Results shown are representative of at least four independent experiments. *P < 0.05 versus control (untreated)
Fig. 5Effect of short time exposure vs. long time exposure of glucosamine. a Normal human chondrocytes were treated with 50 mM glucosamine for 2 or 24 h and the autophagosome formation was analyzed by introducing LC3-GFP constructs. b Normal human chondrocytes were left untreated or were treated with 10, 30, 50, or 100 mM glucosamine for 2 or 24 h. Cell morphology was detected by phase-contrast microscopy and peroxidation was analyzed by BODIPY 665/676 staining (upper panel). The RNA levels of ACBD5 and ACOX1 were analyzed by qRT-PCR (lower panel). Results shown are representative of at least four independent experiments. c RNA levels of COMP and ACAN were analyzed by qRT-PCR. Results shown are representative of at least four independent experiments
Fig. 6Effect of short time exposure vs. long time exposure of glucosamine. Normal human chondrocytes were cultured as monolayer or pellet and treated with 1, 3, or 10 mM glucosamine for 9 days. Cell morphology of monolayer culture was detected by phase-contrast microscopy and pellet cultures were stained with Alcian blue at day 9 (upper panel). The expression levels of cartilage matrix genes such as COMP, ACAN and apoptotic genes such as CASP1, 3, 9, FAS were analyzed by qRT-PCR. Results shown are representative of at least four independent experiments. *P < 0.05 versus control (untreated)