Literature DB >> 26518679

Do High-Risk Young Adults Use the HIV Self-Test Appropriately? Observations from a Think-Aloud Study.

Rebecca Schnall1, Rita Marie John2, Alex Carballo-Dieguez3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to understand high-risk young adults' use of the rapid human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) self-test. The highest rate of new HIV infections occurs in people between 15 and 24 years. Improving identification of young people infected with HIV is a critical public health priority. The first rapid HIV self-testing kit was approved in the US in 2012. Despite the product's promise, its use by untrained young adults is not well-understood. We conducted a mixed methods study using surveys, a think-aloud protocol, observations, and in-depth interviews. A systematic checklist was developed to assess participants' use of the test. A total of 21 racial and/or ethnic minority young adults aged 18-24 participated in this study. Analysis of our interview data was guided by the theory of reasoned action (TRA). Participants completed the initial procedures of the test with a mean time of 8:36 min (range of 2:04'-16:33'). On a 14-point checklist, participants had a mean score of 10.8 (SD 2.26, range 3-14). In the qualitative analysis of the participants' interviews, guided by the theoretical constructs of the TRA, the following themes emerged: "Did I use it correctly?", "Can I trust the results?" (attitude); "How will my partner react?!", "What will people think?" (subjective norm); "Quick, easy and blood free," and "Avoids the hassle of dealing with the healthcare system" (behavioral intention). This study provided evidence of the usefulness of the test perceived by young adults, especially in light of their concerns about lack of privacy in medical settings. Since many participants did not follow all of the instructions while using the test, it is not evident that young adults can correctly use the HIV self-test. Development of instructions manuals that are understandable and guide proper use of medical devices is a great need, especially in the context of home testing technology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HIV self-test; HIV testing; Homeless; Think-aloud; Young adults

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26518679      PMCID: PMC4799728          DOI: 10.1007/s10461-015-1240-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS Behav        ISSN: 1090-7165


  25 in total

1.  Disparities in adolescent health and health care: does socioeconomic status matter?

Authors:  Paul W Newacheck; Yun Yi Hung; M Jane Park; Claire D Brindis; Charles E Irwin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The analysis and interpretation of cognitive interviews for instrument development.

Authors:  Kathleen Knafl; Janet Deatrick; Agatha Gallo; Gwynne Holcombe; Marie Bakitas; Jane Dixon; Margaret Grey
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.228

3.  Think-aloud technique and protocol analysis in clinical decision-making research.

Authors:  Heljä Lundgrén-Laine; Sanna Salanterä
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2009-12-03

4.  Performance of the English and Spanish S-TOFHLA among publicly insured Medicaid and Medicare patients.

Authors:  Abigail Calkins Aguirre; Nadia Ebrahim; Judy A Shea
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2005-03

5.  Ethnic and gender disparities in needed adolescent mental health care.

Authors:  John F Fred Thomas; Jeff R Temple; Noe Perez; Richard Rupp
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2011-02

Review 6.  Rapid HIV testing at home: does it solve a problem or create one?

Authors:  Rochelle P Walensky; A David Paltiel
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-09-19       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Expanded screening for HIV in the United States--an analysis of cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  A David Paltiel; Milton C Weinstein; April D Kimmel; George R Seage; Elena Losina; Hong Zhang; Kenneth A Freedberg; Rochelle P Walensky
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-02-10       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Acceptability of routine HIV testing ("opt-out") in antenatal services in two rural districts of Zimbabwe.

Authors:  Freddy Perez; Charity Zvandaziva; Barbara Engelsmann; François Dabis
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 3.731

9.  HIV testing attitudes, AIDS stigma, and voluntary HIV counselling and testing in a black township in Cape Town, South Africa.

Authors:  S C Kalichman; L C Simbayi
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.519

10.  Routine HIV testing in Botswana: a population-based study on attitudes, practices, and human rights concerns.

Authors:  Sheri D Weiser; Michele Heisler; Karen Leiter; Fiona Percy-de Korte; Sheila Tlou; Sonya DeMonner; Nthabiseng Phaladze; David R Bangsberg; Vincent Iacopino
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  A Global Review of HIV Self-testing: Themes and Implications.

Authors:  Danielle R Stevens; Caroline J Vrana; Raviv E Dlin; Jeffrey E Korte
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2018-02

2.  Few Aggressive or Violent Incidents are Associated with the Use of HIV Self-tests to Screen Sexual Partners Among Key Populations.

Authors:  Alex Carballo-Diéguez; Rebecca Giguere; Iván C Balán; Curtis Dolezal; William Brown; Javier Lopez-Rios; Alan Sheinfil; Timothy Frasca; Christine Rael; Cody Lentz; Raynier Crespo; Catherine Cruz Torres; Cheng-Shiun Leu; Irma Febo
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2020-07

3.  ANI Emerging Leaders Project: Point-of-Care Technology for HIV Prevention and Management.

Authors:  Rebecca Schnall
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Establishing a usability cut-point for the health information technology usability evaluation scale (Health-ITUES).

Authors:  Kah Poh Loh; Jianfang Liu; Sarah Ganzhorn; Gabriella Sanabria; Rebecca Schnall
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 4.046

5.  Negotiating Use of a Blood-Based, Dual HIV and Syphilis Test with Potential Sexual Partners Among a Sample of Cisgender Men and Transgender Women Who Have Sex with Men in New York City.

Authors:  Cody Lentz; Javier Lopez-Rios; Curtis Dolezal; Bryan A Kutner; Christine Tagliaferri Rael; Iván C Balán
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-04-21

Review 6.  A Scoping Review of Patient Preferences for HIV Self-Testing Services in the United States: Implications for Harm Reduction.

Authors:  Mary E Hawk; Ashley Chung; Stephanie L Creasy; James E Egan
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 2.711

7.  'I will welcome this one 101%, I will so embrace it': a qualitative exploration of the feasibility and acceptability of HIV self-testing among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Lagos, Nigeria.

Authors:  Osasuyi Dirisu; Adekemi Sekoni; Lung Vu; Sylvia Adebajo; Jean Njab; Elizabeth Shoyemi; Sade Ogunsola; Waimar Tun
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2020-12-23

8.  Information, Motivation, and Behavioral Skills of High-Risk Young Adults to Use the HIV Self-Test.

Authors:  William Brown; Alex Carballo-Diéguez; Rita Marie John; Rebecca Schnall
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2016-09

9.  Experiences using and organizing HIV self-testing.

Authors:  Yilu Qin; Larry Han; Andrew Babbitt; Jennifer S Walker; Fengying Liu; Harsha Thirumurthy; Weiming Tang; Joseph D Tucker
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2018-01-28       Impact factor: 4.177

10.  Suitability and Sufficiency of Telehealth Clinician-Observed, Participant-Collected Samples for SARS-CoV-2 Testing: The iCollect Cohort Pilot Study.

Authors:  Jodie L Guest; Patrick S Sullivan; Mariah Valentine-Graves; Rachel Valencia; Elizabeth Adam; Nicole Luisi; Mariko Nakano; Jeannette Guarner; Carlos Del Rio; Charles Sailey; Zoe Goedecke; Aaron J Siegler; Travis H Sanchez
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2020-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.