S A Sattar1, C Bradley2, R Kibbee1, R Wesgate3, M A C Wilkinson2, T Sharpe4, J-Y Maillard5. 1. Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 2. Hospital Infection Research Laboratory, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. 3. Cardiff School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. 4. Filtaflex Ltd, Almonte, Ontario, Canada. 5. Cardiff School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. Electronic address: MaillardJ@cardiff.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The use of disinfectant pre-soaked wipes (DPW) to decontaminate high-touch environmental surfaces (HTES) by wiping is becoming increasingly widespread in the healthcare environment. However, DPW are rarely tested using conditions simulating their field use, and the label claims of environmental surface disinfectants seldom include wiping action. AIM: To evaluate the new E2967-15 standard test specific to wipes, particularly their ability to decontaminate surfaces and to transfer acquired contamination to clean surfaces. METHODS: ASTM Standard E2967-15 was used by three independent laboratories to test the efficacy of five types of commercially available wipe products. All data generated were pulled together, and reproducibility and repeatability of the standard were measured. FINDINGS: All the commercial DPW tested achieved a >4log10 (>99.99%) reduction in colony-forming units (CFU) of Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter baumanii with 10s of wiping, but only one DPW containing 0.5% accelerated H2O2 prevented the transfer of bacteria to another surface. CONCLUSION: This newly introduced standard method represents a significant advance in assessing DPW for microbial decontamination of HTES, and should greatly assist research and development, and in making more relevant and reliable claims on marketed DPW.
BACKGROUND: The use of disinfectant pre-soaked wipes (DPW) to decontaminate high-touch environmental surfaces (HTES) by wiping is becoming increasingly widespread in the healthcare environment. However, DPW are rarely tested using conditions simulating their field use, and the label claims of environmental surface disinfectants seldom include wiping action. AIM: To evaluate the new E2967-15 standard test specific to wipes, particularly their ability to decontaminate surfaces and to transfer acquired contamination to clean surfaces. METHODS: ASTM Standard E2967-15 was used by three independent laboratories to test the efficacy of five types of commercially available wipe products. All data generated were pulled together, and reproducibility and repeatability of the standard were measured. FINDINGS: All the commercial DPW tested achieved a >4log10 (>99.99%) reduction in colony-forming units (CFU) of Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter baumanii with 10s of wiping, but only one DPW containing 0.5% accelerated H2O2 prevented the transfer of bacteria to another surface. CONCLUSION: This newly introduced standard method represents a significant advance in assessing DPW for microbial decontamination of HTES, and should greatly assist research and development, and in making more relevant and reliable claims on marketed DPW.
Authors: Nicholas W M Edwards; Emma L Best; Simon D Connell; Parikshit Goswami; Chris M Carr; Mark H Wilcox; Stephen J Russell Journal: Sci Technol Adv Mater Date: 2017-03-14 Impact factor: 8.090
Authors: Mark I Garvey; Martyn A C Wilkinson; Craig W Bradley; Kerry L Holden; Elisabeth Holden Journal: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Date: 2018-12-19 Impact factor: 4.887
Authors: Beatrice Casini; Anna Righi; Nunzio De Feo; Michele Totaro; Serena Giorgi; Lavinia Zezza; Paola Valentini; Enrico Tagliaferri; Anna Laura Costa; Simona Barnini; Angelo Baggiani; Pietro Luigi Lopalco; Paolo Malacarne; Gaetano Pierpaolo Privitera Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-10-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Patryk Tarka; Agnieszka Chojecka; Olga Paduch; Aneta Nitsch-Osuch; Krzysztof Kanecki; Anna Kierzkowska Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-09-18 Impact factor: 3.390