Literature DB >> 26518112

Parental Decisional Regret after Primary Distal Hypospadias Repair: Family and Surgery Variables, and Repair Outcomes.

Filippo Ghidini1, Sasa Sekulovic1, Marco Castagnetti2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Decisional regret is defined as distress after making a health care choice and can be an issue for parents electing distal hypospadias repair for their sons. We assessed the influence on decisional regret of variables related to the family, surgery and outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Charts for 372 patients undergoing primary distal hypospadias repair between 2005 and 2012 were reviewed, and validated questionnaires, including the Decisional Regret Scale, Pediatric Penile Perception Score and Dysfunctional Voiding and Incontinence Scoring System, were administered to parents.
RESULTS: Data were available for 172 of 372 families (response rate 46.2%). Of 323 parents 128 (39.6%) presented with moderately strong decisional regret, with good agreement within couples. Predictors of decisional regret included intermediate parental educational level (OR 3.19, 95% CI 1.52-6.69), patient not being the first born (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.07-3.78), family history of hypospadias (OR 4.42, 95% CI 1.96-9.97), initial desire to avoid surgery (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.04-4.12), younger age at followup (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.72-0.91), presence of lower urinary tract symptoms (OR 4.92, 95% CI 1.53-15.81) and lower Pediatric Penile Perception Score (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.99). Decisional regret was unrelated to parental desire to avoid circumcision, surgical variables, development of complications and duration of followup.
CONCLUSIONS: Decisional regret is a problem in a significant proportion of parents electing distal hypospadias repair for their sons. In our experience family variables seemed to be predictors of decisional regret, while surgical variables did not. Predictors of decisional regret included worse parental perception of penile appearance and the presence of lower urinary tract symptoms. However, the latter could be unrelated to surgery. Irrespective of the duration of followup, decisional regret seems decreased in parents of older patients.
Copyright © 2016 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision making; hypospadias; informed consent; reconstructive surgical procedures; urethra

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26518112     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  13 in total

1.  Psychological Adjustment of Parents of Children Born with Atypical Genitalia 1 Year after Genitoplasty.

Authors:  Rebecca E H Ellens; Dana M Bakula; Alexandria J Mullins; Kristy J Scott Reyes; Paul Austin; Laurence Baskin; Kerlly Bernabé; Earl Y Cheng; Allyson Fried; Dominic Frimberger; Denise Galan; Lynette Gonzalez; Saul Greenfield; Thomas Kolon; Bradley Kropp; Yegappan Lakshmanan; Sabrina Meyer; Theresa Meyer; Larry L Mullins; Natalie J Nokoff; Blake Palmer; Dix Poppas; Alethea Paradis; Elizabeth Yerkes; Amy B Wisniewski; Cortney Wolfe-Christensen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Community engagement of adolescents in the development of a patient-centered outcome tool for adolescents with a history of hypospadias repair.

Authors:  K H Chan; J Panoch; A Carroll; S Downs; M P Cain; R Frankel; B Cockrum; C Moore; S Wiehe
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 1.830

3.  Decisional regret about surgical and non-surgical issues after genitoplasty among caregivers of female infants with CAH.

Authors:  Rachel S Fisher; Hannah C Espeleta; Laurence S Baskin; Cindy L Buchanan; Yee-Ming Chan; Earl Y Cheng; Douglas E Coplen; David A Diamond; Natalie J Nokoff; Blake W Palmer; Dix P Poppas; Kristy J Scott Reyes; Amy Tishelman; Cortney Wolfe-Christensen; Larry L Mullins; Amy B Wisniewski
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 1.830

4.  Shared decision-making for pediatric elective penile surgery.

Authors:  Wyatt MacNevin; Amanda MacDonald; Paul Hong; Dawn L MacLellan; Peter A Anderson; Rodrigo L P Romao
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 2.052

Review 5.  [Hypospadias : Insights and challenges].

Authors:  I Rübben; R Stein
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Parental perspectives on decision-making about hypospadias surgery.

Authors:  K H Chan; J Panoch; A Carroll; S Wiehe; S Downs; M P Cain; R Frankel
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 1.830

7.  A shared decision-making tool for individuals living with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome.

Authors:  Erica M Weidler; Arlene Baratz; Miriam Muscarella; S Janett Hernandez; Kathleen van Leeuwen
Journal:  Semin Pediatr Surg       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  User-centered development of a hypospadias decision aid prototype.

Authors:  Katherine H Chan; Rosalia Misseri; Aaron Carroll; Richard Frankel; Courtney M Moore; Brandon Cockrum; Sarah E Wiehe
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 1.830

9.  Does Preputial Reconstruction Increase Complication Rate of Hypospadias Repair? 20-Year Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Marco Castagnetti; Michele Gnech; Lorenzo Angelini; Waifro Rigamonti; Vincenzo Bagnara; Ciro Esposito
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.418

10.  Concordance of Expert and Parental Opinion about Hypospadias Surgical Outcome Is Severity Dependent.

Authors:  Marcos Raymond Pérez-Brayfield; Juan Carlos Jorge; Luis A Avilés; Joanne Díaz; Vanessa Ortiz; Wilfredo Morales-Cosme
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.418

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.