Literature DB >> 26514811

The effect of dual-task difficulty on the inhibition of the motor cortex.

Daniel T Corp1, Mark A Rogers2, George J Youssef2, Alan J Pearce3.   

Abstract

Dual-tasking is intrinsic to many daily activities, including walking and driving. However, the activity of the primary motor cortex (M1) in response to dual-tasks (DT) is still not well characterised. A recent meta-analysis (Corp in Neurosci Biobehav Rev 43:74-87, 2014) demonstrated a reduction in M1 inhibition during dual-tasking, yet responses were not consistent between studies. It was suggested that DT difficulty might account for some of this between-study variability. The aim of this study was to investigate whether corticospinal excitability and M1 inhibition differed between an easier and more difficult dual-task. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to participants' abductor pollicis brevis muscle representation during a concurrent pincer grip task and stationary bike-riding. The margin of error in which to maintain pincer grip force was reduced to increase task difficulty. Compared to ST conditions, significantly increased M1 inhibition was demonstrated for the easier, but not more difficult, DT. However, there was no significant difference in M1 inhibition between easy and difficult DTs. The difference in difficulty between the two tasks may not have been wide enough to result in significant differences in M1 inhibition. Increased M1 inhibition for the easy DT condition was in opposition to the reduction in M1 inhibition found in our meta-analysis (Corp in Neurosci Biobehav Rev 43:74-87, 2014). We propose that this may be partially explained by differences in the timing of the TMS pulse between DT studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Difficulty; Dual-task; Inhibition; Motor cortex

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26514811     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4479-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  38 in total

1.  Functional reorganisation of the corticomotor projection to the hand in skilled racquet players.

Authors:  A J Pearce; G W Thickbroom; M L Byrnes; F L Mastaglia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Movement-related EEG potentials are force or end-effector dependent: evidence from a multi-finger experiment.

Authors:  S Slobounov; J Johnston; H Chiang; W Ray
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 3.  Cognitive motor interference while walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emad Al-Yahya; Helen Dawes; Lesley Smith; Andrea Dennis; Ken Howells; Janet Cockburn
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Dual-task training reduces impact of cognitive task on postural sway.

Authors:  G L Pellecchia
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Effects of remote muscle contraction on transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor evoked potentials and silent periods in humans.

Authors:  Toshiki Tazoe; Masanori Sakamoto; Tsuyoshi Nakajima; Takashi Endoh; Tomoyoshi Komiyama
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  A neurophysiological basis for the coordination between hand and foot movement.

Authors:  Andrew J K McIntyre-Robinson; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Corticospinal activity during dual tasking: a systematic review and meta-analysis of TMS literature from 1995 to 2013.

Authors:  Daniel T Corp; Jarrad A G Lum; Gregory A Tooley; Alan J Pearce
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Magnetic stimulation of the human brain: facilitation of motor responses by voluntary contraction of ipsilateral and contralateral muscles with additional observations on an amputee.

Authors:  C W Hess; K R Mills; N M Murray
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1986-11-11       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Benefits of cognitive dual-task training on balance performance in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Karen Z H Li; E Roudaia; M Lussier; L Bherer; A Leroux; P A McKinley
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 6.053

10.  Dual-task costs in aging are predicted by formal education.

Authors:  Antonino Vallesi
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.636

View more
  3 in total

1.  Reduced motor cortex inhibition and a 'cognitive-first' prioritisation strategy for older adults during dual-tasking.

Authors:  Daniel T Corp; George J Youssef; Ross A Clark; Joyce Gomes-Osman; Meryem A Yücel; Stuart J Oldham; Shatha Aldraiwiesh; Jordyn Rice; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Mark A Rogers
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 4.032

2.  Obstacle avoidance movement-related motor cortical activity with cognitive task.

Authors:  Akihiro Matsuura; Natsumi Sai; Ayaka Yamaoka; Tetsuya Karita; Futoshi Mori
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-11-14       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Neuromuscular Control Deficits and the Risk of Subsequent Injury after a Concussion: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  David R Howell; Robert C Lynall; Thomas A Buckley; Daniel C Herman
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 11.136

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.